Fact Check: Pakistan praises Trump for peace, then condemns his Iran bombing within 24 hours!

Fact Check: "Pakistan praises Trump for peace, then condemns his Iran bombing within 24 hours!"

What We Know

On June 21, 2025, reports emerged that Pakistan had nominated former President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, citing his efforts to promote peace in the region. This nomination was made shortly before the U.S. military conducted airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, which Pakistan condemned on June 22, 2025, stating that the attacks violated international law and emphasizing that diplomacy should be the primary approach to resolving conflicts (Reuters, ABC News).

The airstrikes were part of a broader U.S. military operation that involved three sites in Iran, aimed at weakening Iran's nuclear capabilities amid ongoing tensions in the region (AP News). The Pakistani government expressed its disapproval of the military action, highlighting the need for diplomatic solutions rather than military interventions (Reuters, ABC News).

Analysis

The claim that Pakistan praised Trump for peace and then condemned his actions within 24 hours is partially true. Initially, Pakistan's nomination of Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize could be interpreted as a form of praise, reflecting a recognition of his diplomatic efforts. However, this was quickly overshadowed by the U.S. strikes on Iran, which Pakistan condemned almost immediately afterward.

The sources reporting on these events are credible, with Reuters and ABC News being well-established news organizations known for their journalistic standards. The timeline of events is clear: Pakistan's nomination occurred just before the airstrikes, followed by a swift condemnation of those strikes (Reuters, ABC News).

However, the context of the nomination is essential. The nomination for a peace prize does not equate to an endorsement of all of Trump's policies or actions, especially those that contradict the principles of diplomacy that Pakistan advocates. The rapid shift from praise to condemnation illustrates the complexities of international relations and how quickly public sentiment can change in response to military actions.

Conclusion

The claim is partially true. While it accurately reflects the sequence of events—Pakistan's nomination of Trump for a peace prize followed by a condemnation of his military actions—the nuances of diplomatic relations and the motivations behind these actions require careful consideration. The initial praise does not imply unconditional support for all of Trump's policies, particularly those that contradict Pakistan's stance on military interventions.

Fact Check: Pakistan praises Trump for peace, then condemns his Iran bombing within 24 hours!