TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged so far, with five more trials scheduled to take place from September 2023 onwards.

Fact Check: Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged so far, with five more trials scheduled to take place from September 2023 onwards.

Published June 16, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged ...

Fact Check: "Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged so far, with five more trials scheduled to take place from September 2023 onwards."

What We Know

The claim refers to Operation Lytton, which is part of ongoing investigations into historical child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, England. Recently, seven men were convicted for their roles in the systematic abuse of two girls between 2001 and 2006. These convictions were reported by multiple sources, including the Crown Prosecution Service and the BBC. The men were found guilty of multiple charges, including rape and indecency with a child, following a trial at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court.

As of now, there is no verified information confirming that 37 individuals have been charged under Operation Lytton, nor is there any mention of five additional trials scheduled from September 2023 onwards. The reports primarily focus on the recent convictions of the seven men and do not provide details on the total number of individuals charged or upcoming trials related to this specific operation.

Analysis

The claim about 37 individuals being charged and five trials scheduled lacks supporting evidence from credible sources. The recent convictions of the seven men are well-documented, but the broader context of Operation Lytton remains unclear. The Crown Prosecution Service and Greater Manchester Police have not released any statements indicating that 37 individuals have been charged as part of this operation.

The sources that do discuss the recent convictions focus on the specific case and do not mention a larger number of charges or future trials. For instance, the BBC and The Guardian emphasize the successful prosecution of the seven men but do not provide any information about additional individuals or upcoming trials.

Given the lack of corroborating evidence for the claim, it appears to be an exaggeration or misinterpretation of the current situation regarding child sexual exploitation cases in Rochdale.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim regarding Operation Lytton resulting in 37 individuals being charged and five upcoming trials is not supported by the available evidence. The recent convictions of seven men are confirmed, but there is no reliable information to substantiate the broader claims about the number of charges or future trials. Further investigation and verification from credible sources are necessary to clarify the status of Operation Lytton and any associated legal proceedings.

Sources

  1. Seven men convicted for sexually exploiting children in ...
  2. operation-span-report-january-2024-v3.pdf
  3. Grooming gang guilty of raping and abusing girls
  4. Rochdale child sex abuse ring
  5. Seven men who groomed vulnerable girls in Rochdale ...
  6. Men who groomed girls for sex in Rochdale brought to justice
  7. Seven men convicted of sexual exploitation of two teenage ...
  8. Rochdale gang convicted for raping and exploiting ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

๐Ÿ’ก Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
โœ“100% Free
โœ“No Registration
โœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.
Partially True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Operation Take Back America aims to eliminate cartels and transnational criminal organizations.
Unverified
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Operation Take Back America aims to eliminate cartels and transnational criminal organizations.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Operation Take Back America aims to eliminate cartels and transnational criminal organizations.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.
False

Fact Check: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.

Aug 10, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.
Unverified

Fact Check: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Former Georgia Democratic House candidate Carl Sprayberry, who publicly called for the assassination of President Donald Trump in a social media post, has been arrested as part of a sweeping, multi-agency childtrafficking operation.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: โ€œICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. ๐—ช๐—ฒโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.โ€๐Ÿงต
Partially True

Fact Check: โ€œICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. ๐—ช๐—ฒโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.โ€๐Ÿงต

Detailed fact-check analysis of: โ€œICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. ๐—ช๐—ฒโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.โ€๐Ÿงต

Jul 20, 2025
Read more โ†’
Explore All Fact Checks