Fact Check: Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged since its inception in 2015.

Fact Check: Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged since its inception in 2015.

Published June 15, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
ยฑ
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged ...

Fact Check: "Operation Lytton, an investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale, has resulted in 37 individuals being charged since its inception in 2015."

What We Know

Operation Lytton is part of a series of investigations into non-recent child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Rochdale, Greater Manchester. A recent review published on January 15, 2024, detailed the findings of an independent assurance review into historic CSE in Rochdale, which highlighted the failures of statutory agencies to respond to allegations of exploitation from 2004 to 2012 (source-1).

The review noted that since the inception of Operation Lytton, a total of 30 men were convicted across multiple operations, including Lytton, Routh, and Doublet, but it did not specify that 37 individuals were charged under Operation Lytton specifically (source-2).

Analysis

The claim that "37 individuals have been charged" under Operation Lytton appears to be an overstatement. The independent review indicates that while there have been significant convictions resulting from investigations into CSE in Rochdale, the specific number of individuals charged under Operation Lytton alone does not match the claim. The review states that 30 men were convicted in total from the three major operations, which include Lytton, but does not provide a breakdown that supports the figure of 37 charges specifically attributed to Lytton (source-1, source-2).

Furthermore, the credibility of the sources used in this analysis is high, as they stem from official reports and statements from Greater Manchester Police and independent reviews conducted by experts in child protection (source-1, source-3). However, the lack of specificity regarding the number of charges directly linked to Operation Lytton raises questions about the accuracy of the claim.

Conclusion

The claim that "Operation Lytton has resulted in 37 individuals being charged since its inception in 2015" is Partially True. While it is true that significant investigations into child sexual exploitation have taken place, and many individuals have been convicted, the specific figure of 37 charges attributed to Operation Lytton is not supported by the available evidence. The total number of convictions across related operations is 30, indicating a discrepancy in the claim.

Sources

  1. Review published into Operation Span and non-recent child sexual ...
  2. PDF Outcomes of investigations into non-recent multi-victim multi-offender ...
  3. Statement from the Deputy Mayor on the convictions ...
  4. operation-span-report-january-2024-v3.pdf
  5. Grooming gang guilty of raping and abusing girls
  6. Rochdale child sex abuse ring
  7. Five men convicted of non-recent child sexual exploitation in Rochdale ...
  8. Seven men convicted of sexual exploitation of two teenage ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

๐Ÿ’ก Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
โœ“100% Free
โœ“No Registration
โœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
If you thought the Epstein
files were bad, wait until you
hear this. 21 children were
just rescued from a
four-million-dollar mansion in
California. Not from a cartel,
not overseas but right here in
the sunny California. The
couple behind it, Sylvia Zang
and Guhan Shang. They were
running what looks like a
surrogate agency but is now
being investigated as a
potential child trafficking
operation. One surrogate, Kayla
Elliott said, I was told that
they already had a child and
they just wanted one more. I
didn't know that they had owned
the agency.
Partially True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 If you thought the Epstein files were bad, wait until you hear this. 21 children were just rescued from a four-million-dollar mansion in California. Not from a cartel, not overseas but right here in the sunny California. The couple behind it, Sylvia Zang and Guhan Shang. They were running what looks like a surrogate agency but is now being investigated as a potential child trafficking operation. One surrogate, Kayla Elliott said, I was told that they already had a child and they just wanted one more. I didn't know that they had owned the agency.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: โ€œICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. ๐—ช๐—ฒโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€.
It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.โ€๐Ÿงต
Partially True
๐ŸŽฏ Similar

Fact Check: โ€œICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. ๐—ช๐—ฒโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.โ€๐Ÿงต

Detailed fact-check analysis of: โ€œICE agents are raiding L.A. in masks without badges, names, or accountability. They ignore city and state leaders. They answer only to Trump, Stephen Miller, and Kristi Noem.So the Save America Movement is launching Liberty Vans: ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜€, ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€. ๐—ช๐—ฒโ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—œ๐—–๐—˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—บ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜โ€™๐˜€ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€. It'll cost $500,000 to launch this operation in L.A. and expand nationwide.โ€๐Ÿงต

Jul 20, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: Tom Homan will run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen.
Partially True

Fact Check: Tom Homan will run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Tom Homan will run the biggest deportation operation this country has ever seen.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more โ†’
๐Ÿ”
Partially True

Fact Check: ICE is conducting the largest mass deportation operation in history.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ICE is conducting the largest mass deportation operation in history.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more โ†’
Fact Check: 15 Democrats were indicted for a massive vote harvesting operation in Texas.
Partially True

Fact Check: 15 Democrats were indicted for a massive vote harvesting operation in Texas.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 15 Democrats were indicted for a massive vote harvesting operation in Texas.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more โ†’