TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Official talks between North and South Korea stalled since 2019.

Fact Check: Official talks between North and South Korea stalled since 2019.

Published June 27, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Official talks between North and South Korea stalled since 2019." ## What We Know Official diplomatic talks between North and South Ko...

Fact Check: "Official talks between North and South Korea stalled since 2019."

What We Know

Official diplomatic talks between North and South Korea have indeed been stalled since 2019. This cessation of dialogue corresponds with the breakdown of U.S.-led negotiations aimed at denuclearizing North Korea, which significantly impacted inter-Korean relations (source-4). Following a series of summits in 2018, including the historic Panmunjom Declaration, relations between the two Koreas warmed considerably, but the momentum was lost as diplomatic efforts faltered in 2019 (source-2).

Since then, both countries have seen a deterioration in relations, particularly under the leadership of South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, who has adopted a more confrontational stance towards the North (source-2).

Analysis

The claim that official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019 is supported by multiple credible sources. The Associated Press and NBC News both report that the breakdown of U.S.-led diplomacy on North Korean denuclearization in 2019 directly led to the cessation of official talks between the two Koreas. This aligns with historical context provided in the Wikipedia article on North Korea-South Korea relations, which details the progression of diplomatic efforts and their subsequent decline (source-2).

The reliability of these sources is high; the Associated Press and NBC News are well-established news organizations known for their rigorous reporting standards. Additionally, Wikipedia, while a secondary source, compiles information from various credible references and is regularly updated to reflect current events.

However, it is important to note that while informal communications and exchanges may still occur, the formal diplomatic channels have indeed been inactive since 2019, which is the crux of the claim being evaluated.

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim that "official talks between North and South Korea stalled since 2019" is True. The evidence from multiple reliable sources confirms that the formal diplomatic discussions have not resumed since the breakdown of negotiations in 2019, primarily due to the failure of U.S.-led efforts regarding North Korea's nuclear program.

Sources

  1. Nuclear Negotiations with North Korea
  2. North Korea–South Korea relations
  3. N、S、E、W分别代表什么方位？_百度知道
  4. 6 Americans detained for trying to send rice and Bibles ...
  5. 美国各州名称及缩写 - 百度知道
  6. 6 Americans detained for trying to send rice and Bibles to ...
  7. 北卡罗莱纳州（North Carolina）在美国是怎样的存在 ...
  8. Americans detained trying to send rice, Bibles, dollar bills ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: America doesn't even have an official language
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: America doesn't even have an official language

Detailed fact-check analysis of: America doesn't even have an official language

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Using digital signatures for official correspondence is common practice for both Republicans and Democrats.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Using digital signatures for official correspondence is common practice for both Republicans and Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Using digital signatures for official correspondence is common practice for both Republicans and Democrats.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: English is the official language of the United States.
True

Fact Check: English is the official language of the United States.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: English is the official language of the United States.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mali drop the French language in official languages in favour of national languages
True

Fact Check: Mali drop the French language in official languages in favour of national languages

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mali drop the French language in official languages in favour of national languages

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….
Unverified

Fact Check: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks