Fact Check: Official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019.

Fact Check: Official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019.

Published June 27, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019." ## What We Know Official diplomatic discussions between North K...

Fact Check: "Official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019."

What We Know

Official diplomatic discussions between North Korea and South Korea have indeed been stalled since 2019. This cessation of talks coincided with the breakdown of U.S.-led diplomacy aimed at denuclearizing North Korea. Reports indicate that following the failure of negotiations, both sides have not engaged in formal discussions, and attempts to revive talks have not yielded results (Los Angeles Times, Jamaica Gleaner).

Analysis

The claim that official talks have stalled since 2019 is supported by multiple credible sources. The Los Angeles Times and Jamaica Gleaner both report that the diplomatic efforts have not resumed since the breakdown of negotiations related to North Korea's nuclear program.

The reliability of these sources is high, as they are established news organizations with a history of covering international relations and North Korean affairs. The information is corroborated by the consistent narrative across various reports, indicating a lack of formal dialogue between the two Koreas since 2019.

Furthermore, the context surrounding this claim includes recent political developments in South Korea, where the new government under President Lee Jae Myung has expressed intentions to restart talks. However, the effectiveness of these intentions remains uncertain, especially given North Korea's previous statements about severing relations with the South (Jamaica Gleaner).

Conclusion

The claim that official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019 is True. The evidence from multiple reputable sources confirms that there have been no significant diplomatic engagements since the breakdown of U.S.-led negotiations on North Korea's denuclearization.

Sources

  1. Los Angeles Times - Six Americans detained in South Korea for trying to send rice and Bibles ...
  2. Jamaica Gleaner - Six Americans detained in South Korea for trying to send rice and ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: America doesn't even have an official language
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: America doesn't even have an official language

Detailed fact-check analysis of: America doesn't even have an official language

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Using digital signatures for official correspondence is common practice for both Republicans and Democrats.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Using digital signatures for official correspondence is common practice for both Republicans and Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Using digital signatures for official correspondence is common practice for both Republicans and Democrats.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: English is the official language of the United States.
True

Fact Check: English is the official language of the United States.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: English is the official language of the United States.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mali drop the French language in official languages in favour of national languages
True

Fact Check: Mali drop the French language in official languages in favour of national languages

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mali drop the French language in official languages in favour of national languages

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….
Unverified

Fact Check: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Official talks between North and South Korea have stalled since 2019. | TruthOrFake Blog