Fact Check: No court has ruled on the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order.

Published June 28, 2025

•By

✓

VERDICT

True

# Fact Check: "No court has ruled on the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order." ## What We Know The claim that "No court has rul...

Fact Check: "No court has ruled on the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order."

What We Know

The claim that "No court has ruled on the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order" is supported by recent developments in the legal landscape surrounding this issue. As of June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court did not directly rule on the constitutionality of President Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship. Instead, the Court limited the ability of lower courts to issue universal injunctions against executive actions, which indirectly affects the enforcement of Trump's order (NPR, Reuters).

In the case of Trump v. CASA, Inc., the Supreme Court's ruling did not address the merits of the birthright citizenship order itself, leaving the constitutionality of the order unexamined by the highest court (Supreme Court, New York Times). The executive order, issued on Trump's first day in office, asserts that the Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee citizenship to all individuals born in the U.S. (NPR).

Analysis

The evidence indicates that while lower courts had previously blocked Trump's birthright citizenship order, citing potential violations of constitutional rights, the Supreme Court's recent decision did not resolve the constitutional questions raised by the order. Instead, it focused on procedural aspects, specifically the limitations on nationwide injunctions that had previously prevented the enforcement of the order (BBC, Washington Post).

The sources consulted are credible and provide a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings. NPR, Reuters, and The New York Times are established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. The Supreme Court's own documentation is the primary source of legal information, providing direct insight into the Court's rulings and reasoning (Supreme Court).

However, it is essential to note that while the Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the order, lower courts had previously indicated that the order likely violates citizenship laws (Reuters). This suggests that while the constitutional question remains unresolved at the Supreme Court level, there is a significant legal discourse surrounding the issue.

Conclusion

The claim that "No court has ruled on the constitutionality of Trump's birthright citizenship order" is True. The Supreme Court has not addressed the constitutionality of the executive order, and while lower courts have expressed concerns about its legality, no definitive ruling has been made at the highest judicial level. The ongoing legal challenges indicate that this issue will continue to evolve in the courts.

Sources

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results