Fact Check: No CNAPP tool exist that is FEDRAMP High certified.

Claim Analysis: "No CNAPP tool exists that is FEDRAMP High certified."

1. Introduction

The claim that "No CNAPP tool exists that is FEDRAMP High certified" suggests a lack of certified cloud-native application protection platforms (CNAPPs) that meet the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) High standards. This assertion raises questions about the availability of secure cloud solutions for federal agencies, particularly in light of increasing cybersecurity needs.

2. What We Know

FedRAMP is a U.S. government program that standardizes the security assessment and authorization of cloud services used by federal agencies. The program categorizes services into three impact levels: Low, Moderate, and High, with High being the most stringent in terms of security requirements 1 3.

Recent reports indicate that several CNAPPs have achieved FedRAMP High authorization:

Aqua Security announced that its CNAPP has received FedRAMP High authorization, making it available for federal use 4 7.
Palo Alto Networks claims that its Prisma Cloud is the only CNAPP to achieve FedRAMP High authorization, emphasizing its compliance with the highest security standards 5 8.
SentinelOne has also reported that its Purple AI CNAPP has achieved FedRAMP High authorization 10.

These certifications indicate that there are indeed CNAPP tools that meet the FedRAMP High standards, contradicting the claim in question.

3. Analysis

The claim that no CNAPP tools are FedRAMP High certified appears to be inaccurate based on the evidence currently available. The sources cited provide specific examples of CNAPPs that have achieved this certification.

Source Evaluation

FedRAMP.gov 1: This is the official government website for FedRAMP, making it a highly reliable source for information regarding certifications and policies. However, it does not directly list CNAPPs, focusing instead on the general framework and requirements.
FedRAMP Marketplace 2: This database is a credible resource for identifying authorized cloud services, including CNAPPs. It is maintained by the government and is regularly updated.
Aqua Security 4 7: As a company that has achieved FedRAMP High authorization, Aqua Security's announcements are credible but should be viewed with some caution due to potential bias in promoting their services.
Palo Alto Networks 5 8: Similar to Aqua, Palo Alto Networks has a vested interest in promoting its products. While their claims about being the only CNAPP with FedRAMP High authorization are significant, they should be cross-referenced with independent sources for verification.
SentinelOne 10: This source is also a company announcement, which may carry a promotional bias. However, the information aligns with other reports about FedRAMP High authorization.

Conflicts of Interest

The companies promoting their own products (Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks, and SentinelOne) may have conflicts of interest, as their statements could be influenced by their business objectives. Independent verification from unbiased sources would strengthen the reliability of their claims.

Methodology and Evidence

The methodology behind the claim that no CNAPP tools are FedRAMP High certified is unclear, as it does not cite any specific sources or evidence. The lack of detail raises questions about the validity of the assertion. It would be beneficial to know the basis for this claim, including any specific sources or data that led to this conclusion.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "No CNAPP tool exists that is FEDRAMP High certified" is false. Evidence from multiple sources indicates that several CNAPPs, including those from Aqua Security, Palo Alto Networks, and SentinelOne, have achieved FedRAMP High authorization. This contradicts the assertion made in the claim and highlights the availability of certified cloud-native application protection platforms for federal use.

It is important to note that while the evidence supporting the existence of certified CNAPPs is compelling, the claims made by the companies themselves may carry inherent biases due to their vested interests in promoting their products. Therefore, while the current data supports the conclusion that CNAPPs exist with FedRAMP High certification, further independent verification would enhance the reliability of these claims.

Additionally, the methodology behind the original claim lacks clarity, which raises questions about its validity. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and seek out multiple sources to form a well-rounded understanding of the topic.