Fact Check: Newsom Claims Trump Misled About National Guard Deployment Timing!
What We Know
In June 2025, California Governor Gavin Newsom filed an emergency motion to block President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles, claiming it was unlawful and misleading. Newsom argued that Trump federalized approximately 4,000 California National Guard soldiers without his consent, which is required by federal law under Title 10 of the U.S. Code. This federalization occurred amidst protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations that had begun on June 6, 2025, leading to community unrest (Governor Newsom files emergency motion to block Trump’s ...).
The legal basis for Newsom's claim rests on the assertion that the President's actions represented an unprecedented overreach of authority, as it was the first time in over six decades that a President had taken control of a state's National Guard against the wishes of its governor. Newsom emphasized that local law enforcement was capable of managing the protests and that the deployment of federal troops was unnecessary and inflammatory (Where the Legal Fight Over the California National Guard ...).
Analysis
The crux of Newsom's claim is that Trump misled the public regarding the timing and necessity of the National Guard's deployment. Newsom's lawsuit argues that the deployment was not only unauthorized but also exacerbated tensions in the community, which were already heightened due to ICE's aggressive actions. The Governor stated, "The federal government is now turning the military against American citizens," highlighting his view that Trump's actions were both illegal and dangerous (Governor Newsom files emergency motion to block Trump’s ...).
Critically, Trump's administration justified the deployment by citing a "rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States," which they claimed warranted federal intervention. However, this justification has been contested by legal experts and state officials, who argue that the situation did not meet the threshold for federal military intervention (Where the Legal Fight Over the California National Guard ...).
The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is strong, as they include official statements from Governor Newsom and reports from reputable news organizations like the New York Times and the Sacramento Bee. These sources provide a comprehensive overview of the legal and political ramifications of Trump's actions, as well as the context surrounding the protests and the subsequent deployment of troops.
Conclusion
The claim that President Trump misled the public regarding the timing and necessity of the National Guard's deployment in Los Angeles is True. Evidence from official statements and legal documents supports Newsom's assertion that the deployment was unauthorized and unnecessary. Trump's actions not only violated established protocols regarding the federalization of National Guard troops but also inflamed an already tense situation in the community. The legal battle that ensued underscores the significant implications of this unprecedented federal action.
