Fact Check: Natural News is a reliable pro-science source.

Fact Check: Natural News is a reliable pro-science source.

Published March 25, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Natural News: A Claim of Reliability in Science Reporting ## Introduction The claim that "Natural News is a reliable pro-science source" presents a...

Natural News: A Claim of Reliability in Science Reporting

Introduction

The claim that "Natural News is a reliable pro-science source" presents a contentious assertion about a website known for its controversial stance on various health and scientific issues. This article will explore the credibility of Natural News, examining its history, the nature of its content, and the evaluations provided by various fact-checking organizations and media analysts.

What We Know

Natural News, founded by Mike Adams in 2008, has been characterized as a source that promotes alternative medicine and conspiracy theories, particularly regarding vaccines and other health-related topics. According to its Wikipedia entry, it is labeled as a "far-right, anti-vaccination conspiracy theory and fake news website" 2. The site has been noted for disseminating information that often contradicts established scientific consensus, particularly in the fields of health and medicine.

Several fact-checking organizations have assessed Natural News and found it to be lacking in reliability. Media Bias/Fact Check rates it as a "Questionable source," citing its promotion of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as its extreme right-wing bias 5. Furthermore, the site has failed numerous fact checks, indicating a pattern of disseminating misinformation 56.

Analysis

The reliability of Natural News as a pro-science source can be critically evaluated through various lenses:

  1. Source Credibility: Natural News has been repeatedly classified as a purveyor of misinformation and pseudoscience. The Wikipedia entry notes its promotion of disinformation, while Media Bias/Fact Check highlights its extreme bias and failure in fact-checking 25. This raises significant questions about the site's credibility as a source of scientific information.

  2. Bias and Objectivity: The characterization of Natural News as a far-right platform suggests a potential bias in its reporting. This bias can influence the presentation of scientific information, leading to a skewed interpretation that may not align with established scientific consensus. The site’s founder, Mike Adams, has been associated with various controversial views, further complicating the objectivity of the content produced 29.

  3. Methodology and Evidence: The claims made by Natural News often lack rigorous scientific backing. The site has been criticized for promoting "quackery-level pseudoscience," which indicates a failure to adhere to the standards of evidence-based science 5. The absence of peer-reviewed sources and reliance on anecdotal evidence further undermine the reliability of its claims.

  4. Conflicts of Interest: The financial and ideological motivations behind Natural News may also play a role in its content. The promotion of alternative medicine can be lucrative, and the site may have vested interests in promoting certain products or ideologies that align with its anti-establishment narrative 9.

  5. Contradicting Sources: In contrast to Natural News, reputable sources such as Science News have been consistently rated as pro-science, emphasizing the importance of sourcing information from credible outlets and peer-reviewed journals 8. This highlights the stark difference in reliability between Natural News and established scientific publications.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To further evaluate the claim regarding Natural News, additional information would be beneficial, including:

  • A comprehensive analysis of specific articles published by Natural News to assess their claims against peer-reviewed scientific literature.
  • Insights from experts in health and science communication regarding the impact of misinformation on public health.
  • A comparative study of audience reception and belief in information from Natural News versus established scientific sources.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "Natural News is a reliable pro-science source" is assessed as false based on a thorough examination of the site's content, credibility, and the evaluations from various fact-checking organizations. Key evidence includes the consistent classification of Natural News as a source of misinformation and pseudoscience, as well as its documented failure to adhere to standards of evidence-based reporting. The site's extreme bias and promotion of conspiracy theories further undermine its reliability as a scientific source.

It is important to note that while this verdict is based on available evidence, the landscape of information can be complex and fluid. The potential for bias in reporting and the influence of financial motivations on content creation are significant factors that should be considered when evaluating any source. Additionally, the evidence available is primarily derived from assessments by fact-checking organizations and expert analyses, which may not encompass every aspect of the site's output.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information from all sources, including Natural News, and to seek out peer-reviewed scientific literature and reputable outlets for reliable information on health and science topics.

Sources

  1. Fakery and science - PMC
  2. Natural News - Wikipedia
  3. Fake News: How to Spot It: Resources - Research Guides
  4. List of fake news websites
  5. Natural News - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
  6. NaturalNewsBlogs - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
  7. Fact-checks | PolitiFact
  8. Science News - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
  9. Anatomy of a Disinformation Empire: Investigating NaturalNews
  10. Fact check: How to spot fabricated news reports - DW

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Natural gas is a green energy source that competes with solar and wind.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Natural gas is a green energy source that competes with solar and wind.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Natural gas is a green energy source that competes with solar and wind.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Natural gas is a significant energy source for many countries.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Natural gas is a significant energy source for many countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Natural gas is a significant energy source for many countries.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The natural enemy of the bat is the clown
False

Fact Check: The natural enemy of the bat is the clown

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The natural enemy of the bat is the clown

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Epstein died of natural causes.
False

Fact Check: Epstein died of natural causes.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Epstein died of natural causes.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself.

That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began.

John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.
Partially True

Fact Check: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Natural News is a reliable pro-science source. | TruthOrFake Blog