Fact Check: "Nationwide injunctions have become commonplace since Obama's presidency."
What We Know
Nationwide injunctions are court orders that prohibit the enforcement of a law or policy across the entire country, rather than just within a specific jurisdiction. The frequency of such injunctions has been a topic of discussion, particularly in relation to the presidencies of Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden.
According to a report by the Congressional Research Service, there were 19 nationwide injunctions issued during Obama's presidency, compared to 12 during George W. Bush's administration and 55 during Trump's presidency (source-1, source-3). This indicates a significant increase in the use of nationwide injunctions during the Trump administration.
A study published by the Administrative Conference of the United States noted that the use of nationwide injunctions has become more prevalent in recent years, with a notable increase in the number of such injunctions filed against the Trump administration (source-2). The report highlights that the trend of issuing nationwide injunctions has been rising, particularly since 2015, when a group of Republican state attorneys general successfully obtained a national injunction against President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative (source-4).
Analysis
The claim that "nationwide injunctions have become commonplace since Obama's presidency" is partially true. While it is accurate that there has been an increase in the issuance of nationwide injunctions, particularly during the Trump administration, the term "commonplace" may require further clarification.
-
Historical Context: The data shows that the number of nationwide injunctions issued during Obama's presidency (19) was higher than during Bush's (12), but significantly lower than during Trump's (55). This suggests a trend towards more frequent use of nationwide injunctions, especially in response to executive actions (source-1, source-3).
-
Recent Developments: The increase in nationwide injunctions has been linked to heightened political polarization and the use of the judiciary as a tool for political battles. The trend noted in 2015 with the DACA injunction marks a pivotal moment where such injunctions began to be viewed as a more common legal strategy (source-4).
-
Source Reliability: The sources cited, including reports from the Congressional Research Service and the Administrative Conference of the United States, are credible and provide a comprehensive overview of the legal landscape surrounding nationwide injunctions. However, the interpretation of "commonplace" can vary based on the context and the specific time frame being considered.
Conclusion
The claim that "nationwide injunctions have become commonplace since Obama's presidency" is partially true. While there has been a noticeable increase in the issuance of nationwide injunctions, particularly during the Trump administration, the term "commonplace" may not fully capture the historical context and the variations in frequency across different presidencies. The trend indicates a growing reliance on nationwide injunctions as a legal tool, especially in politically contentious cases.
