Fact Check: Nationwide Injunctions Against Trump’s Policies Now Severely Limited by Supreme Court
What We Know
On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that significantly curtailed the use of nationwide or universal injunctions, which had previously allowed federal judges to block executive actions across the entire country. This decision was particularly relevant to President Trump's administration, as it had faced numerous challenges through such injunctions. The ruling was a response to a case involving Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship, where multiple federal judges had issued universal injunctions against the order (source-1, source-2, source-3). The Supreme Court's conservative majority argued that universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority granted to federal courts by Congress (source-2).
Analysis
The Supreme Court's decision to limit universal injunctions is seen as a significant victory for the Trump administration, allowing for a more streamlined implementation of executive policies without the risk of nationwide blocks from individual judges. The ruling was passed with a 6-3 vote, indicating a strong consensus among the conservative justices against the broad application of universal injunctions (source-5, source-7). Critics of universal injunctions, including Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, have previously labeled them as "legally and historically dubious," suggesting that their rise in usage has been a recent phenomenon that could undermine judicial authority (source-2).
The ruling effectively ends the practice of using universal injunctions as a default option to block executive orders, which had been a common strategy employed by various groups opposing Trump's policies. This change is expected to reshape the landscape of judicial challenges to executive actions moving forward, limiting the power of individual judges to impose nationwide restrictions (source-3, source-5).
Conclusion
Verdict: True
The claim that nationwide injunctions against Trump’s policies are now severely limited by the Supreme Court is accurate. The Court's recent ruling has effectively curtailed the ability of federal judges to issue universal injunctions, which previously allowed for broad judicial intervention against executive actions. This decision represents a significant shift in the judicial landscape, particularly benefiting the Trump administration's ability to implement its policies without facing nationwide legal challenges.
