Fact Check: NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map showed three red blots in the Gulf of Oman, but the authenticity of the claims regarding the ships being on fire could not be verified.

Fact Check: NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map showed three red blots in the Gulf of Oman, but the authenticity of the claims regarding the ships being on fire could not be verified.

Published June 17, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map showed three red blots in the Gulf of Oman, but the authenticity of ...

Fact Check: "NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map showed three red blots in the Gulf of Oman, but the authenticity of the claims regarding the ships being on fire could not be verified."

What We Know

Recent reports indicated that NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) map displayed three red hotspots in the Gulf of Oman, which may suggest the presence of fires in that area (source-5, source-8). These hotspots were reported in conjunction with claims circulating on social media that three ships were on fire near the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime passage (source-6). However, officials have not confirmed any incidents of ships actually being on fire, leading to uncertainty regarding the authenticity of the claims (source-5).

Analysis

The FIRMS map is a reliable tool for detecting active fires and thermal anomalies using satellite data from MODIS and VIIRS instruments (source-1, source-2). The presence of red hotspots on the map does indicate heat signatures that are consistent with fires. However, the interpretation of these data points requires caution, as they do not provide definitive evidence of the nature or cause of the heat signatures observed (source-3).

While the FIRMS data suggests the possibility of fires, the lack of official confirmation or additional corroborative data means that the claims about ships being on fire remain unverified. Reports from a British maritime security firm, Ambrey, noted an incident in the vicinity but clarified that it was not security-related, further complicating the narrative (source-6). This indicates that while there may be heat signatures, the context and implications of those signatures are still unclear.

Conclusion

The claim that NASA's FIRMS map showed three red blots in the Gulf of Oman is accurate; however, the assertion that these blots confirm ships are on fire is not substantiated by official verification. Therefore, the overall verdict is Partially True. The FIRMS data indicates potential fire activity, but without further evidence or confirmation, the situation remains ambiguous.

Sources

  1. Nasa | Lance | Firms
  2. NASA | LANCE | FIRMS - Active Fire Data
  3. FIRMS: NASA | LANCE
  4. Fire Alert Subscription - NASA | LANCE | FIRMS
  5. Gulf of Oman: Ships on fire near Strait of Hormuz amid rising Iran ...
  6. Three ships allegedly on fire near Strait of Hormuz based on satellite ...
  7. Gulf of Oman: Ships on fire near Strait of Hormuz amid ...
  8. Strait of Hormuz: Why the narrow waterway is at stake as Israel-Iran ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map indicated three heat signatures in the Gulf of Oman on October 2023.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map indicated three heat signatures in the Gulf of Oman on October 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map indicated three heat signatures in the Gulf of Oman on October 2023.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Foreign Investor Quietly Drops $65M. on Fire-Charred Malibu Lots. Real estate insiders say the buyer, not a U.S. citizen, snapped up multiple burned properties through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires. The investor’s identity and country of origin remain hidden behind layers of legal and financial secrecy.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Foreign Investor Quietly Drops $65M. on Fire-Charred Malibu Lots. Real estate insiders say the buyer, not a U.S. citizen, snapped up multiple burned properties through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires. The investor’s identity and country of origin remain hidden behind layers of legal and financial secrecy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Foreign Investor Quietly Drops $65M. on Fire-Charred Malibu Lots. Real estate insiders say the buyer, not a U.S. citizen, snapped up multiple burned properties through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires. The investor’s identity and country of origin remain hidden behind layers of legal and financial secrecy.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: la wildfires event was highly predictable and almost inevitable due to many ignorances of red flags - not a rare act of god
Partially True

Fact Check: la wildfires event was highly predictable and almost inevitable due to many ignorances of red flags - not a rare act of god

Detailed fact-check analysis of: la wildfires event was highly predictable and almost inevitable due to many ignorances of red flags - not a rare act of god

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.
Partially True

Fact Check: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is the UN, NY Times, and Hamas all happy now?  How to debunk this myth: “I'm sure Hamas is.  Their lies & propaganda destroyed cease-fire deal, tried to discredit safe and functioning GHF effort, emboldened Hamas & will result in this complete balagan!  Most sad for hostage” families-grief prolonged”
Partially True

Fact Check: Is the UN, NY Times, and Hamas all happy now? How to debunk this myth: “I'm sure Hamas is. Their lies & propaganda destroyed cease-fire deal, tried to discredit safe and functioning GHF effort, emboldened Hamas & will result in this complete balagan! Most sad for hostage” families-grief prolonged”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is the UN, NY Times, and Hamas all happy now? How to debunk this myth: “I'm sure Hamas is. Their lies & propaganda destroyed cease-fire deal, tried to discredit safe and functioning GHF effort, emboldened Hamas & will result in this complete balagan! Most sad for hostage” families-grief prolonged”

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) Map showed three red blots in the Gulf of Oman, but the authenticity of the claims regarding the ships being on fire could not be verified. | TruthOrFake Blog