Fact Check: Monogamy is no longer reasonable

Is Monogamy No Longer Reasonable?

Introduction

The claim that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" suggests a significant shift in societal attitudes towards romantic relationships, particularly in the context of consensual non-monogamy (CNM). This assertion raises questions about the evolving norms surrounding relationships and whether traditional monogamous structures are becoming obsolete.

What We Know

1. Cultural Context: Monogamy has been a dominant relationship model in many Western societies, often viewed as the ideal or "norm" for romantic partnerships. This societal framework influences how individuals perceive and engage in relationships, with non-monogamous arrangements frequently facing stigma and negative evaluations 13.

2. Research on Non-Monogamy: Studies indicate that while monogamous relationships are often seen as superior, consensual non-monogamous relationships can offer comparable, if not better, outcomes in terms of satisfaction and emotional health. For instance, a review highlighted that individuals in CNM relationships often experience resilience against stigma and stress, despite societal pressures favoring monogamy 46.

3. Changing Preferences: Recent surveys suggest a growing openness to non-monogamous relationships. A YouGov poll indicated that 55% of Americans are open to some form of non-monogamy, reflecting a shift in attitudes towards relationship structures [7](https://today.yougov.com/society/articles/45271-how-many-americans-prefer-nonmonogamy-relationship#:~:text=A%20majority%20of%20Americans%20(55,something%20other%20than%20complete%20monogamy.).

4. Stigma and Health Outcomes: The stigma associated with CNM can lead to negative health outcomes, suggesting that societal perceptions of monogamy as a moral high ground may not align with the lived experiences of individuals in non-monogamous relationships 46.

Analysis

The claim that monogamy is no longer reasonable is supported by a variety of sources, yet it is essential to evaluate the credibility and potential biases of these sources:

• Academic Research: Articles from peer-reviewed journals, such as those published in Springer and Psychology Today, provide empirical evidence regarding the dynamics of monogamous and non-monogamous relationships. These sources typically undergo rigorous peer review, enhancing their reliability 346. However, the interpretation of data may still reflect the authors' perspectives, particularly in studies exploring societal norms.

• Popular Media: Sources like Beezzly and YouGov present findings that resonate with contemporary cultural shifts but may lack the depth of academic scrutiny. For example, Beezzly's article discusses societal changes but does not provide extensive empirical backing for its claims 5. Similarly, while YouGov's survey results are informative, they represent a snapshot of public opinion rather than a comprehensive analysis of relationship dynamics.

• Potential Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have inherent biases. For instance, articles discussing the benefits of non-monogamy may be influenced by advocacy for alternative relationship structures, which could color their presentation of monogamy as outdated or unreasonable 8.

• Methodological Considerations: The methodologies employed in studies examining relationship satisfaction and stigma are crucial. For example, surveys measuring preferences for monogamy versus non-monogamy must account for various demographic factors to avoid skewed results. Furthermore, the definitions of what constitutes "reasonable" in terms of relationship structures are subjective and may vary widely among different cultural or social groups.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The assertion that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" remains unverified due to the complexity of the evidence surrounding societal attitudes towards monogamous and non-monogamous relationships. While there is a growing body of research indicating a shift in preferences and acceptance of consensual non-monogamy, the evidence is not definitive enough to categorically state that monogamy is unreasonable.

Key evidence includes surveys showing increased openness to non-monogamous relationships and studies suggesting that CNM can lead to comparable or superior relationship satisfaction. However, the interpretation of these findings is nuanced, as they are influenced by cultural contexts and individual experiences. Additionally, the potential biases in popular media and the subjective nature of what constitutes "reasonable" complicate the matter further.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence. Much of the data relies on self-reported surveys, which may not capture the full spectrum of relationship dynamics or account for demographic variations. Furthermore, societal norms are continually evolving, and what may seem reasonable today could change in the future.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the broader context of relationship structures as societal attitudes continue to evolve.

Sources

1. A Narrative Review of the Dichotomy Between the Social Views of Non-Monogamy and Monogamy. Retrieved from PMC
2. Non-monogamy - Wikipedia. Retrieved from Wikipedia
3. A Narrative Review of the Dichotomy Between the Social Views of Non-Monogamy and Monogamy. Retrieved from Springer
4. "Monogamy? In this Economy?": Stigma and Resilience in Consensual Non-Monogamous Relationships. Retrieved from Springer
5. Is Monogamy Dead? The New Norm. Retrieved from Beezzly
6. Infidelity, Monogamy, and Consensual Non-Monogamy: Key Findings. Retrieved from Psychology Today
7. How many Americans prefer non-monogamy in relationships? Retrieved from [YouGov](https://today.yougov.com/society/articles/45271-how-many-americans-prefer-nonmonogamy-relationship#:~:text=A%20majority%20of%20Americans%20(55,something%20other%20than%20complete%20monogamy.)
8. Monogamy: the Renegade Choice. Retrieved from Institute for Family Studies