Fact Check: Monogamy is no longer reasonable

Fact Check: "Monogamy is no longer reasonable"

What We Know

The claim that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" reflects a growing discourse around relationship structures, particularly in the context of evolving societal norms. Recent discussions highlight both the benefits and criticisms of monogamous relationships. For instance, Kyle York, a PhD student at the University of Colorado Boulder, argues in his paper that while some philosophers criticize monogamy as "immoral" due to perceived restrictions on partners, he defends it by emphasizing its practical benefits, such as simplicity in planning life together and fostering intimacy (source-1).

Conversely, there is evidence suggesting a resurgence of interest in monogamy, particularly within queer communities. An article from Autostraddle notes that many individuals who previously identified with polyamory are now opting for monogamous relationships, citing comfort and familiarity as significant factors (source-3). This shift indicates that while non-monogamy has gained visibility, monogamy remains a viable and attractive option for many.

Analysis

The assertion that monogamy is "no longer reasonable" can be seen as a reflection of changing attitudes rather than an absolute truth. On one hand, York's defense of monogamy highlights its practical advantages, such as increased intimacy and reduced logistical complications when compared to non-monogamous arrangements (source-1). This suggests that for some, monogamy is not only reasonable but also preferable.

On the other hand, the rise of polyamory and non-monogamous relationships has challenged traditional views on love and commitment. The article from Autostraddle illustrates that many individuals are now gravitating towards monogamy after experiencing the complexities of polyamorous relationships. This indicates a nuanced understanding of relationship dynamics, where monogamy is being reconsidered as a legitimate and even desirable choice in certain contexts (source-3).

The reliability of sources discussing these topics varies. Academic discussions, such as those by York, are grounded in philosophical inquiry and provide a structured argument for monogamy, while personal narratives from platforms like Autostraddle offer anecdotal evidence that reflects broader social trends. Both types of sources contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the evolving landscape of romantic relationships.

Conclusion

The claim that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" is Partially True. While there is a growing discourse that critiques monogamy and promotes non-monogamous relationships, there is also a significant resurgence of interest in monogamy, particularly among those who find it aligns better with their personal values and relationship goals. This duality suggests that monogamy remains a reasonable choice for many, even as societal norms continue to evolve.