Fact Check: Monogamy is no longer reasonable

Fact Check: Monogamy is no longer reasonable

Published March 16, 2025Updated June 18, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Monogamy is no longer reasonable" ## What We Know The claim that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" reflects a growing discourse aroun...

Fact Check: "Monogamy is no longer reasonable"

What We Know

The claim that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" reflects a growing discourse around relationship structures, particularly in the context of evolving societal norms. Recent discussions highlight both the benefits and criticisms of monogamous relationships. For instance, Kyle York, a PhD student at the University of Colorado Boulder, argues in his paper that while some philosophers criticize monogamy as "immoral" due to perceived restrictions on partners, he defends it by emphasizing its practical benefits, such as simplicity in planning life together and fostering intimacy (source-1).

Conversely, there is evidence suggesting a resurgence of interest in monogamy, particularly within queer communities. An article from Autostraddle notes that many individuals who previously identified with polyamory are now opting for monogamous relationships, citing comfort and familiarity as significant factors (source-3). This shift indicates that while non-monogamy has gained visibility, monogamy remains a viable and attractive option for many.

Analysis

The assertion that monogamy is "no longer reasonable" can be seen as a reflection of changing attitudes rather than an absolute truth. On one hand, York's defense of monogamy highlights its practical advantages, such as increased intimacy and reduced logistical complications when compared to non-monogamous arrangements (source-1). This suggests that for some, monogamy is not only reasonable but also preferable.

On the other hand, the rise of polyamory and non-monogamous relationships has challenged traditional views on love and commitment. The article from Autostraddle illustrates that many individuals are now gravitating towards monogamy after experiencing the complexities of polyamorous relationships. This indicates a nuanced understanding of relationship dynamics, where monogamy is being reconsidered as a legitimate and even desirable choice in certain contexts (source-3).

The reliability of sources discussing these topics varies. Academic discussions, such as those by York, are grounded in philosophical inquiry and provide a structured argument for monogamy, while personal narratives from platforms like Autostraddle offer anecdotal evidence that reflects broader social trends. Both types of sources contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the evolving landscape of romantic relationships.

Conclusion

The claim that "monogamy is no longer reasonable" is Partially True. While there is a growing discourse that critiques monogamy and promotes non-monogamous relationships, there is also a significant resurgence of interest in monogamy, particularly among those who find it aligns better with their personal values and relationship goals. This duality suggests that monogamy remains a reasonable choice for many, even as societal norms continue to evolve.

Sources

  1. Budding philosopher makes a (qualified) defense of monogamy
  2. Monogamy: Weighing the Pros and Cons of this Naturalized Convention
  3. Is Monogamy Cool Again?
  4. Is Monogamy Part of 'Who We Are'? Romantic Norms, Defensiveness, and Collective Identity
  5. What is 'modern monogamy'? Why it's a fit for some couples.
  6. Monogamy: The Classic Love Blueprint (Or Is It?)
  7. Monogamy as a Force of Social Progress and Women's Empowerment
  8. 2023's subversive relationship trend: monogamy

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Coffee helps you live longer
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Coffee helps you live longer

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Coffee helps you live longer

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Coffee helps you live longer
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Coffee helps you live longer

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Coffee helps you live longer

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The United States no longer has a balance of powers.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The United States no longer has a balance of powers.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The United States no longer has a balance of powers.

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms.
Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead.
This could include:
Border shutdowns
Lockdowns
Mass vaccination efforts
Digital health ID systems
All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo
General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill
Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b
Partially True

Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The sentence for abortion is longer than for rape
Partially True

Fact Check: The sentence for abortion is longer than for rape

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The sentence for abortion is longer than for rape

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: After the phase of the Trump presidency, where he's no longer answering questions, he's reacting to the sound of them. Now, I want you to watch this very carefully. Peter Doocy, Fox News reporter, of all people, tosses Trump a softball question. Do you think there's a threat of a left-wing militia targeting ICE? You know, a simple yes or no, or let me talk about Antrifa, would have probably done the trick. But instead, Trump just starts saying random words. I do not believe that Trump has the cognitive capacity to parse, understand, and meaningfully respond to most questions.
Partially True

Fact Check: After the phase of the Trump presidency, where he's no longer answering questions, he's reacting to the sound of them. Now, I want you to watch this very carefully. Peter Doocy, Fox News reporter, of all people, tosses Trump a softball question. Do you think there's a threat of a left-wing militia targeting ICE? You know, a simple yes or no, or let me talk about Antrifa, would have probably done the trick. But instead, Trump just starts saying random words. I do not believe that Trump has the cognitive capacity to parse, understand, and meaningfully respond to most questions.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: After the phase of the Trump presidency, where he's no longer answering questions, he's reacting to the sound of them. Now, I want you to watch this very carefully. Peter Doocy, Fox News reporter, of all people, tosses Trump a softball question. Do you think there's a threat of a left-wing militia targeting ICE? You know, a simple yes or no, or let me talk about Antrifa, would have probably done the trick. But instead, Trump just starts saying random words. I do not believe that Trump has the cognitive capacity to parse, understand, and meaningfully respond to most questions.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →