Fact Check: Millions protested against Trump, marking some of the largest demonstrations in U.S. history.

Fact Check: Millions protested against Trump, marking some of the largest demonstrations in U.S. history.

Published June 19, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Millions protested against Trump, marking some of the largest demonstrations in U.S. history." ## What We Know Protests against Donald...

Fact Check: "Millions protested against Trump, marking some of the largest demonstrations in U.S. history."

What We Know

Protests against Donald Trump have been a significant aspect of his presidency, with numerous demonstrations occurring both during his campaign and throughout his time in office. The most notable protests include the Women's March on January 21, 2017, which is reported to have drawn between 2 to 4 million participants across the United States, making it one of the largest single-day protests in U.S. history (Wikipedia). Additionally, various protests have been organized in response to Trump's policies, including immigration reforms and the travel ban, with some events reportedly involving hundreds of thousands of participants (BBC, NPR).

The "No Kings" protests, which occurred recently, also saw participation from millions across all 50 states, indicating a sustained level of opposition to Trump's presidency (NPR).

Analysis

The claim that "millions protested against Trump" is substantiated by several large-scale protests, particularly the Women's March, which is widely recognized as a historic event in terms of participation. The estimates of 2 to 4 million participants are supported by multiple sources, including major news outlets and academic analyses (Wikipedia, BBC).

However, while the Women's March and other significant protests indicate a high level of engagement, the term "some of the largest demonstrations in U.S. history" can be somewhat subjective. For instance, while the Women's March is indeed one of the largest, other protests, such as those against the Vietnam War or civil rights marches in the 1960s, also drew millions and are often cited in discussions of historical protest sizes.

Moreover, the reliability of sources reporting on these protests varies. Wikipedia is a collaborative platform that can be edited by anyone, which raises questions about the accuracy of its data, although it often cites credible sources. In contrast, established news organizations like the BBC and NPR provide vetted information and are generally considered reliable (BBC, NPR).

Conclusion

The claim that "millions protested against Trump, marking some of the largest demonstrations in U.S. history" is Partially True. While there is substantial evidence to support the occurrence of large protests, particularly the Women's March, the context of "largest demonstrations" can be debated. The protests against Trump were indeed significant in scale and impact, but they are part of a broader historical narrative of protest in the United States.

Sources

  1. Protests against Donald Trump - Wikipedia
  2. Mass protests against Trump across US as president holds ...
  3. People across the 50 states gather in 'No Kings' protests ...
  4. List of protests and demonstrations in the United States by ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump is false
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump is false

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump is false

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump is true
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump is true

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump is true

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump fasle
Partially True

Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump fasle

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump fasle

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate

he did make a
fortune from China. 4 million in
income in 2017 and 2. 2 million
in income in twenty eighteen.
Most of which came from Chinese
or Ukrainian interests. But and
this directly goes against what
Joe Biden said in the debate in
2020 with Donald Trump
True

Fact Check: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate he did make a fortune from China. 4 million in income in 2017 and 2. 2 million in income in twenty eighteen. Most of which came from Chinese or Ukrainian interests. But and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hunter DID make millions from Even after Biden China & Ukraine denied it in the debate he did make a fortune from China. 4 million in income in 2017 and 2. 2 million in income in twenty eighteen. Most of which came from Chinese or Ukrainian interests. But and this directly goes against what Joe Biden said in the debate in 2020 with Donald Trump

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: MILLIONS of liberals are now planning for a 'Blackout Day' to protest Trump.. They will be skipping work and not spending money, in an attempt to crash the economy.
Partially True

Fact Check: MILLIONS of liberals are now planning for a 'Blackout Day' to protest Trump.. They will be skipping work and not spending money, in an attempt to crash the economy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: MILLIONS of liberals are now planning for a 'Blackout Day' to protest Trump.. They will be skipping work and not spending money, in an attempt to crash the economy.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →