TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Milei's administration abstained from a key UN vote, breaking with previous support for Ukraine.

Fact Check: Milei's administration abstained from a key UN vote, breaking with previous support for Ukraine.

Published June 22, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Milei's administration abstained from a key UN vote, breaking with previous support for Ukraine." ## What We Know Recently, Argentina'...

Fact Check: "Milei's administration abstained from a key UN vote, breaking with previous support for Ukraine."

What We Know

Recently, Argentina's President Javier Milei's administration abstained from a United Nations vote that condemned Russia's actions in Ukraine. This abstention is significant as it marks a departure from Argentina's previous support for Ukraine during the ongoing conflict. Historically, Argentina had aligned itself with the Global South and supported Ukraine in various international forums, including the UN. However, under Milei's leadership, there has been a noticeable shift towards a more right-wing foreign policy, aligning closer with the United States and Israel, and distancing itself from traditional allies in Latin America (AP News, Buenos Aires Herald).

The UN resolution in question was part of a series of votes where Argentina's stance has drawn criticism. For instance, Milei's government was the only one among the Group of 20 nations to vote against a resolution promoting gender equality, further emphasizing a trend of isolation from the international community (AP News). This shift in foreign policy has sparked significant backlash within Argentina, with various political factions expressing concern over the implications of such a drastic change (AP News).

Analysis

The claim that Milei's administration abstained from a key UN vote and broke with previous support for Ukraine is partially true. While it is accurate that Argentina abstained from a vote condemning Russia, it is essential to contextualize this within the broader changes in Milei's foreign policy. The abstention reflects a significant pivot from Argentina's earlier position, which had been more supportive of Ukraine, particularly during the previous administration (Buenos Aires Herald, IntelliNews).

The sources used to substantiate this claim are reliable, with the AP News article providing a comprehensive overview of the situation and the reactions it has provoked. The Buenos Aires Herald and other local news outlets also corroborate the shift in policy and the political ramifications, indicating a consensus among credible news organizations regarding the change in Argentina's international stance (AP News, Buenos Aires Herald, Batimes).

However, it is crucial to note that while the abstention is a clear indicator of a shift, it does not represent a complete abandonment of support for Ukraine, as the situation is still evolving. Milei's administration has made several controversial decisions that suggest a broader ideological realignment, which may continue to affect Argentina's foreign policy in the future (IntelliNews, Batimes).

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim that "Milei's administration abstained from a key UN vote, breaking with previous support for Ukraine" is Partially True. While the abstention from the UN vote is a factual occurrence and indicates a significant shift in foreign policy, it is part of a larger trend of Milei's government distancing itself from traditional alliances and adopting a more right-wing stance. The implications of this shift are still unfolding, and it remains to be seen how it will affect Argentina's international relationships moving forward.

Sources

  1. In Milei's latest drastic move, Argentina is sole UN holdout ...
  2. Presidency of Javier Milei
  3. Argentina abstains from UN vote condemning Russia
  4. Zelenskyy left in the cold as Milei takes Trumpian twist
  5. Argentina breaks with Ukraine support at UN, echoing ...
  6. Argentina shifts stance on Ukraine in United Nations vote

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Public documents and statements list alignment with Trump administration ideology (e.g. opposition to DEI or transgender policies) as the reason for the freeze—not to benefit Trump-owned businesses.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Public documents and statements list alignment with Trump administration ideology (e.g. opposition to DEI or transgender policies) as the reason for the freeze—not to benefit Trump-owned businesses.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Public documents and statements list alignment with Trump administration ideology (e.g. opposition to DEI or transgender policies) as the reason for the freeze—not to benefit Trump-owned businesses.

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Peter Thiel was publicly confronted and questioned for helping establish a “police state” under the Trump administration via his association with Palantir and influence.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Peter Thiel was publicly confronted and questioned for helping establish a “police state” under the Trump administration via his association with Palantir and influence.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Peter Thiel was publicly confronted and questioned for helping establish a “police state” under the Trump administration via his association with Palantir and influence.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 He changed his tune and he's now and he's previously called for Guillane Maxwell to be pardoned he said over here it's not the Trump administration he goes there is no list right here you know there's no client list watch what he has to say here play this clip is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggest that Jeffrey Epstein 00:31 made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. There are several of them from accusers that accuse Jeffrey that accused various people of having improper sex and and that has been redacted. The names of the people accu
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 He changed his tune and he's now and he's previously called for Guillane Maxwell to be pardoned he said over here it's not the Trump administration he goes there is no list right here you know there's no client list watch what he has to say here play this clip is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggest that Jeffrey Epstein 00:31 made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. There are several of them from accusers that accuse Jeffrey that accused various people of having improper sex and and that has been redacted. The names of the people accu

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 He changed his tune and he's now and he's previously called for Guillane Maxwell to be pardoned he said over here it's not the Trump administration he goes there is no list right here you know there's no client list watch what he has to say here play this clip is the government hiding a client list or anything that the Trump administration could release tonight No, there is no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggest that Jeffrey Epstein 00:31 made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers. There are several of them from accusers that accuse Jeffrey that accused various people of having improper sex and and that has been redacted. The names of the people accu

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".
Partially True

Fact Check: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So if Biden’s administration destroyed the files, what the fuck was this "The image shows conservative commentators, including Kash Patel (left, holding a binder), exiting the West Wing of the White House, carrying binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1".

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks