Fact Check: Medical experts determined Brineura no longer benefits Charleigh Pollock.

Fact Check: Medical experts determined Brineura no longer benefits Charleigh Pollock.

Published June 20, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Medical experts determined Brineura no longer benefits Charleigh Pollock." ## What We Know Charleigh Pollock, a 9-year-old girl from B...

Fact Check: "Medical experts determined Brineura no longer benefits Charleigh Pollock."

What We Know

Charleigh Pollock, a 9-year-old girl from British Columbia, suffers from CLN2, a rare and terminal neurological disorder known as Batten disease. She has been receiving Brineura (cerliponase alpha), the only drug approved for her condition, since 2019. Recently, the provincial health ministry announced that funding for her treatment would be discontinued, citing clinical evidence that indicates Brineura is no longer beneficial once a patient's motor and language functions begin to decline significantly (Capital Daily).

Health Minister Josie Osborne stated that a review by Canada’s Drug Agency (CDA) found no evidence to support ongoing funding for Brineura given Charleigh's advanced condition. The CDA's findings align with the clinical criteria used to assess the efficacy of the drug, which suggests that it does not provide life-saving benefits and primarily slows the progression of the disease (Langley Advance Times).

Analysis

The claim that "medical experts determined Brineura no longer benefits Charleigh Pollock" is supported by the statements made by health officials and the findings from the CDA review. The health ministry emphasized that the decision to discontinue funding was based on rigorous, evidence-based assessments conducted by independent medical experts (CBC News).

Charleigh's mother, Jori Fales, has expressed her belief that the clinical criteria for discontinuation are outdated and that her daughter has benefited from the treatment, reducing her seizures significantly (Langley Advance Times). However, the health ministry's position is that the evidence does not support the continuation of treatment at this stage of Charleigh's disease progression.

The sources cited are credible, with the Capital Daily and CBC News being reputable news outlets that report on health and local issues. The health ministry's statements are backed by clinical evidence and expert reviews, which adds to the reliability of the claim.

Conclusion

The verdict is True. Medical experts, through the CDA review and the provincial health ministry's assessment, have determined that Brineura no longer benefits Charleigh Pollock due to the advanced stage of her condition. The decision to discontinue funding aligns with established clinical criteria and evidence-based practices in the treatment of Batten disease.

Sources

  1. YouTube
  2. Province ends treatment funding for terminally ill Langford girl
  3. YouTube
  4. B.C. pulls funding for terminal Island girl's 'life-sustaining ...
  5. YouTube Japan 公式チャンネル
  6. Drug coverage to be discontinued for Langford girl
  7. YouTube
  8. B.C. pulls funding on $1M drug for 9-year-old Vancouver ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just repealed this policy, and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said it plain: Medical decisions should be based on the wellbeing of the patient — not government payouts
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just repealed this policy, and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said it plain: Medical decisions should be based on the wellbeing of the patient — not government payouts

Detailed fact-check analysis of: HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just repealed this policy, and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz said it plain: Medical decisions should be based on the wellbeing of the patient — not government payouts

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump claims he aced an IQ test at Walter Reed Medical Center.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump claims he aced an IQ test at Walter Reed Medical Center.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump claims he aced an IQ test at Walter Reed Medical Center.

Jul 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Turkey ban non medical cesarean birth
True

Fact Check: Turkey ban non medical cesarean birth

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Turkey ban non medical cesarean birth

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide, not murder, according to the medical examiner.
True

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide, not murder, according to the medical examiner.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide, not murder, according to the medical examiner.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Charging small copayments can lead low-income individuals to forgo necessary medical care.
True

Fact Check: Charging small copayments can lead low-income individuals to forgo necessary medical care.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Charging small copayments can lead low-income individuals to forgo necessary medical care.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →