Fact Check: Marjorie Taylor Greene Defends Carlson, Criticizing U.S. Military Actions Against Iran
What We Know
On June 23, 2025, U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly criticized military strikes against Iran, which were ordered by President Donald Trump. Greene's comments came in the context of a broader reaction among Georgia Republicans, where most supported the strikes, citing the prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons as a primary justification. However, Greene diverged from her party's stance, stating, "This is not our fight" and emphasizing that the U.S. should avoid foreign entanglements, which she associated with past neoconservative policies that she opposes (Georgia Recorder).
Greene's comments reflect a consistent theme in her political rhetoric, where she often positions herself as a critic of U.S. military interventions, aligning with a more isolationist viewpoint that resonates with a segment of the Republican base that is wary of foreign wars (The Hill).
Analysis
Greene's defense of Carlson and her criticism of military actions against Iran can be seen as part of her broader political strategy, which emphasizes a return to the non-interventionist principles that were prominent during Trump's presidency. Her statements suggest a rejection of the military-industrial complex, which she argues leads to unnecessary conflicts. Greene's assertion that "there would not be bombs falling on the people of Israel if Netanyahu had not dropped bombs on the people of Iran first" indicates her belief that the U.S. should not be involved in conflicts that are not directly related to American interests (Georgia Recorder).
However, Greene's position has been met with criticism from within her party, where most Georgia Republicans, including Governor Brian Kemp, supported the strikes. This division highlights the evolving dynamics within the GOP, particularly as it grapples with its identity post-Trump. Political analysts have noted that Greene's stance may alienate her from mainstream Republican leadership, which tends to favor a more aggressive foreign policy approach (The Hill).
In assessing the reliability of sources, both the Georgia Recorder and The Hill are reputable news outlets that provide coverage of political events and statements from public figures. They have established editorial standards and are known for reporting on political matters, making them credible sources for this analysis.
Conclusion
The claim that Marjorie Taylor Greene defended Carlson while criticizing U.S. military actions against Iran is True. Greene's statements reflect her consistent anti-war stance and her alignment with a faction of the Republican Party that opposes foreign military interventions. Her remarks illustrate a significant ideological divide within the GOP regarding foreign policy, particularly in the context of Trump's presidency and its aftermath.
