TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Los Angeles is a testing ground for Trump's martial law plans.

Fact Check: Los Angeles is a testing ground for Trump's martial law plans.

Published June 20, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Los Angeles is a testing ground for Trump's martial law plans." ## What We Know The claim that Los Angeles is a testing ground for Tru...

Fact Check: "Los Angeles is a testing ground for Trump's martial law plans."

What We Know

The claim that Los Angeles is a testing ground for Trump's martial law plans stems from recent events surrounding the deployment of the National Guard in response to protests against immigration enforcement. Following a series of protests, President Trump ordered the deployment of approximately 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, citing the need to protect federal property and personnel during heightened tensions related to immigration raids (AP News).

California Governor Gavin Newsom opposed this deployment, arguing that it was unnecessary and would exacerbate tensions (NPR). Legal experts have described Trump's actions as a potential abuse of power, noting that the President's authority to deploy troops domestically is limited to situations of genuine emergency, such as armed rebellion or when civil agencies are unable to function (NPR).

The deployment has raised significant legal questions, with a federal judge ruling that Trump's actions were illegal, stating they violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded his statutory authority (AP News). The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling, indicating ongoing legal battles regarding the President's authority to deploy troops in this manner (Reuters).

Analysis

The assertion that Los Angeles serves as a "testing ground" for martial law plans can be interpreted in several ways. On one hand, the deployment of National Guard troops in response to civil unrest does resemble actions associated with martial law, particularly given the military's involvement in domestic law enforcement. Experts like Hina Shamsi from the ACLU have characterized this deployment as a dangerous overreach of presidential power that undermines democratic principles and risks civilian safety (NPR).

However, it is crucial to assess the context and intent behind the deployment. The Trump administration has framed the National Guard's presence as a necessary measure to protect federal agents and property amid what they described as violent protests (NPR). This framing suggests that the deployment was not explicitly intended as a precursor to martial law but rather as a response to immediate concerns regarding public safety and order.

The sources supporting the claim highlight the legal and ethical implications of deploying military forces in civilian contexts, which can be seen as a step toward militarization of law enforcement. However, the lack of explicit plans or declarations from the Trump administration indicating an intent to establish martial law in Los Angeles complicates the narrative.

The reliability of the sources varies; while news outlets like the Associated Press and NPR provide well-researched reporting, the interpretation of events as a "testing ground" for martial law may stem from opinion pieces or analyses that reflect specific political biases (The Atlantic).

Conclusion

The claim that Los Angeles is a testing ground for Trump's martial law plans is Partially True. While the deployment of National Guard troops in response to protests does evoke concerns about the militarization of law enforcement and potential overreach of presidential power, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that this action is part of a broader plan for martial law. The situation reflects a complex interplay of legal authority, public safety concerns, and political tensions rather than a straightforward implementation of martial law.

Sources

  1. What to know about the protests over Trump’s immigration crackdown in LA and other cities
  2. Trump using National Guard in LA is an 'abuse of power,' expert says - NPR
  3. Appeals court questions judges' ability to review Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
  4. Trump and LA: What laws give him authority to send federal troops - NPR
  5. The "Unwilling or Unable" Test for Sending Military to Los Angeles
  6. Trump's Ominous Military Flex in Los Angeles - The Atlantic

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Trump is angry with the BRICS group: "We will not allow the dollar to lose its value." "We received $5.1 trillion in 'investment' from the Gulf, and now $17 billion from Bahrain, and they're all eager to pour more into America!
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump is angry with the BRICS group: "We will not allow the dollar to lose its value." "We received $5.1 trillion in 'investment' from the Gulf, and now $17 billion from Bahrain, and they're all eager to pour more into America!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump is angry with the BRICS group: "We will not allow the dollar to lose its value." "We received $5.1 trillion in 'investment' from the Gulf, and now $17 billion from Bahrain, and they're all eager to pour more into America!

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: All detected text: trump posted PSAs, total BREAKING We have just IMPORTANT WIN in our Historic Lawsuit against Minutes, and Paramount. like C and George Slopadopoulos, Corporate Owners knew that they defrauded the American People, and desperate settle. Minutes have today paid and we also anticipate receiving Million Dollars more from the new Owners, similar Programming, over Million Dollars. This another long VICTORIES Fake News Media, who holding account for their widespread fraud and deceit. Wall Street Journal, The Failing New York Times, The Washington Post, MSDNC, CNN, other Mainstream Media Liars, NOTICE that the days them being allowed the American People are GREAT AGAIN!

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRM THAT ICE IS NOW GOING FROM PARK TO PARK IN LOS ANGELES, ARRESTING CAREGIVERS... SOME WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS, AND SEPARATING THEM FROM THE AMERICAN CHILDREN THEY'RE CARING FOR. KIDS ARE BEING THROWN INTO THE BACK OF VAN UNTIL THEIR PARENTS ARE LOCATED.
False

Fact Check: MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRM THAT ICE IS NOW GOING FROM PARK TO PARK IN LOS ANGELES, ARRESTING CAREGIVERS... SOME WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS, AND SEPARATING THEM FROM THE AMERICAN CHILDREN THEY'RE CARING FOR. KIDS ARE BEING THROWN INTO THE BACK OF VAN UNTIL THEIR PARENTS ARE LOCATED.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRM THAT ICE IS NOW GOING FROM PARK TO PARK IN LOS ANGELES, ARRESTING CAREGIVERS... SOME WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS, AND SEPARATING THEM FROM THE AMERICAN CHILDREN THEY'RE CARING FOR. KIDS ARE BEING THROWN INTO THE BACK OF VAN UNTIL THEIR PARENTS ARE LOCATED.

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks