TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles.

Fact Check: Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles.

Published June 15, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles." ## What We Know On June 14, 2025, signif...

Fact Check: "Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles."

What We Know

On June 14, 2025, significant protests occurred in Los Angeles, particularly outside the downtown Federal Building. Law enforcement officers employed various crowd control measures, including the use of tear gas, to disperse demonstrators. Reports indicate that police began by deploying flash-bangs and rubber bullets before resorting to tear gas as tensions escalated during the protest, which was part of a larger series of demonstrations against immigration policies and the Trump administration's actions (Washington Post, New York Times).

The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) confirmed that they issued a dispersal order, which was met with resistance from protesters, leading to the use of tear gas and other less-lethal munitions (New York Times, The Hill). Eyewitness accounts and video footage corroborate these claims, showing officers on horseback and foot deploying tear gas against the crowd (DNyuz, KTLA).

Analysis

The claim that law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles is substantiated by multiple credible sources. The Washington Post and New York Times both provide detailed accounts of the events, including the sequence of police actions leading to the deployment of tear gas. The reports describe the chaotic atmosphere, where police faced a large crowd that had been protesting for over a week, and the escalation of violence prompted the use of tear gas as a crowd control measure.

The reliability of these sources is high; both the Washington Post and New York Times are established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. They provide thorough coverage with eyewitness accounts and official statements from law enforcement. Additionally, other outlets such as The Hill and KTLA corroborate the use of tear gas, further validating the claim.

However, it is important to note that while the protests were largely peaceful, the police response, including the use of tear gas, has been criticized by some observers as excessive, suggesting a complex dynamic between law enforcement and protesters (New York Times). This context is crucial for understanding the broader implications of the events.

Conclusion

Verdict: True. The evidence clearly indicates that law enforcement officers did use tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. Multiple credible news sources confirm this fact, detailing the police's actions and the circumstances surrounding the protests. The use of tear gas was part of a broader strategy to manage a large and escalating protest situation.

Sources

  1. Police deploy flash-bangs, rubber bullets, tear gas on L.A. ... Washington Post
  2. L.A. Protests Maps: How Immigration Raids and Federal Response Unfolded ... New York Times
  3. June 2025 Los Angeles protests - Wikipedia Wikipedia
  4. Police Clash With Protesters After Anti-Trump Rally in ... New York Times
  5. Officers deploy tear gas, rubber bullets to clear protesters in ... The Hill
  6. Officers deploy tear gas, rubber bullets to clear protesters in ... - DNyuz DNyuz
  7. Officers deploy tear gas, rubber bullets to clear protesters ... KTLA
  8. 'No Kings' protest live updates: Tensions rise in LA as crowd hurls ... ABC7

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: the post asserts that the “violent protests in LA” were misreported and that all the violence came from unprovoked law enforcement, implying protesters were entirely peaceful and media was lying.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the post asserts that the “violent protests in LA” were misreported and that all the violence came from unprovoked law enforcement, implying protesters were entirely peaceful and media was lying.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the post asserts that the “violent protests in LA” were misreported and that all the violence came from unprovoked law enforcement, implying protesters were entirely peaceful and media was lying.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask

Detailed fact-check analysis of: michigan law calls for ice officers to be jailed for wearing mask

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.
False

Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is law-enforcement really arresting people in the US just for showing visuals of anime or is this technically mostly false because most individuals have fair copyright use of gifs
Partially True

Fact Check: is law-enforcement really arresting people in the US just for showing visuals of anime or is this technically mostly false because most individuals have fair copyright use of gifs

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is law-enforcement really arresting people in the US just for showing visuals of anime or is this technically mostly false because most individuals have fair copyright use of gifs

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks