Fact Check: Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles.

Fact Check: Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles.

June 15, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles." ## What We Know On June 14, 2025, signif...

Fact Check: "Law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles."

What We Know

On June 14, 2025, significant protests occurred in Los Angeles, particularly outside the downtown Federal Building. Law enforcement officers employed various crowd control measures, including the use of tear gas, to disperse demonstrators. Reports indicate that police began by deploying flash-bangs and rubber bullets before resorting to tear gas as tensions escalated during the protest, which was part of a larger series of demonstrations against immigration policies and the Trump administration's actions (Washington Post, New York Times).

The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) confirmed that they issued a dispersal order, which was met with resistance from protesters, leading to the use of tear gas and other less-lethal munitions (New York Times, The Hill). Eyewitness accounts and video footage corroborate these claims, showing officers on horseback and foot deploying tear gas against the crowd (DNyuz, KTLA).

Analysis

The claim that law enforcement officers used tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles is substantiated by multiple credible sources. The Washington Post and New York Times both provide detailed accounts of the events, including the sequence of police actions leading to the deployment of tear gas. The reports describe the chaotic atmosphere, where police faced a large crowd that had been protesting for over a week, and the escalation of violence prompted the use of tear gas as a crowd control measure.

The reliability of these sources is high; both the Washington Post and New York Times are established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. They provide thorough coverage with eyewitness accounts and official statements from law enforcement. Additionally, other outlets such as The Hill and KTLA corroborate the use of tear gas, further validating the claim.

However, it is important to note that while the protests were largely peaceful, the police response, including the use of tear gas, has been criticized by some observers as excessive, suggesting a complex dynamic between law enforcement and protesters (New York Times). This context is crucial for understanding the broader implications of the events.

Conclusion

Verdict: True. The evidence clearly indicates that law enforcement officers did use tear gas during the protests on June 14, 2025, in Los Angeles. Multiple credible news sources confirm this fact, detailing the police's actions and the circumstances surrounding the protests. The use of tear gas was part of a broader strategy to manage a large and escalating protest situation.

Sources

  1. Police deploy flash-bangs, rubber bullets, tear gas on L.A. ... Washington Post
  2. L.A. Protests Maps: How Immigration Raids and Federal Response Unfolded ... New York Times
  3. June 2025 Los Angeles protests - Wikipedia Wikipedia
  4. Police Clash With Protesters After Anti-Trump Rally in ... New York Times
  5. Officers deploy tear gas, rubber bullets to clear protesters in ... The Hill
  6. Officers deploy tear gas, rubber bullets to clear protesters in ... - DNyuz DNyuz
  7. Officers deploy tear gas, rubber bullets to clear protesters ... KTLA
  8. 'No Kings' protest live updates: Tensions rise in LA as crowd hurls ... ABC7

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Authorities are searching for 57-year-old Vance Boelter, who is suspected of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers on June 14, 2025.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Authorities are searching for 57-year-old Vance Boelter, who is suspected of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers on June 14, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Authorities are searching for 57-year-old Vance Boelter, who is suspected of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers on June 14, 2025.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The suspect in the shooting, identified as 57-year-old Vance Boelter, is believed to have shot and wounded a second lawmaker, Senator John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, on June 14, 2025.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The suspect in the shooting, identified as 57-year-old Vance Boelter, is believed to have shot and wounded a second lawmaker, Senator John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, on June 14, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The suspect in the shooting, identified as 57-year-old Vance Boelter, is believed to have shot and wounded a second lawmaker, Senator John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, on June 14, 2025.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was unlawful, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling two hours later.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was unlawful, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling two hours later.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was unlawful, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked this ruling two hours later.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz described the shooting of two lawmakers as 'targeted political violence' and called it a 'politically motivated assassination' on June 14, 2025.
Partially True

Fact Check: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz described the shooting of two lawmakers as 'targeted political violence' and called it a 'politically motivated assassination' on June 14, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz described the shooting of two lawmakers as 'targeted political violence' and called it a 'politically motivated assassination' on June 14, 2025.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others.
True

Fact Check: On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On June 12, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that courts cannot apply a higher standard to block lawsuits for damages in some disability discrimination claims compared to others.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Republican health care legislation, referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill, is projected to increase deficits enough to trigger automatic spending reductions that would include cuts to Medicare, according to a 2010 law.
True

Fact Check: The Republican health care legislation, referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill, is projected to increase deficits enough to trigger automatic spending reductions that would include cuts to Medicare, according to a 2010 law.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Republican health care legislation, referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill, is projected to increase deficits enough to trigger automatic spending reductions that would include cuts to Medicare, according to a 2010 law.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →