TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Kellogg would be highest-ranking US official to visit Belarus in years

Fact Check: Kellogg would be highest-ranking US official to visit Belarus in years

Published June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Kellogg would be highest-ranking US official to visit Belarus in years" ## What We Know The claim that Keith Kellogg would be the high...

Fact Check: "Kellogg would be highest-ranking US official to visit Belarus in years"

What We Know

The claim that Keith Kellogg would be the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit Belarus in years is supported by multiple sources. According to a report from Reuters, if Kellogg meets with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, it would mark the highest-level visit by a U.S. official since Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited in February 2020. This assertion is echoed by TASS, which confirms Kellogg's planned visit and reiterates that it would be significant in the context of U.S.-Belarus relations.

Historically, U.S. diplomatic engagement with Belarus has been limited, particularly following the controversial presidential elections in 2020 and the subsequent crackdown on protests. The U.S. Embassy in Minsk has been operating with reduced staff since 2008, and the relationship has been strained due to various geopolitical tensions, including Belarus's support for Russia during the Ukraine conflict (U.S.-Belarus Relations).

Analysis

The sources supporting this claim are credible and provide a consistent narrative. The information from Reuters and TASS is particularly relevant, as they are established news agencies known for reporting on international relations. The context of the visit is also significant; it comes at a time when Belarus is attempting to thaw its relations with the West, as evidenced by recent prisoner releases and diplomatic overtures (New York Times).

The reliability of the sources is bolstered by their track record in covering U.S. foreign policy and Belarusian affairs. However, it is important to note that while the claim is substantiated by these reports, the actual impact of Kellogg's visit on U.S.-Belarus relations remains to be seen, especially given the complex political landscape.

Conclusion

The claim that Kellogg would be the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit Belarus in years is True. The evidence from multiple reputable sources confirms that if the visit occurs, it will indeed represent a significant diplomatic engagement after a long period of limited interaction between the two nations.

Sources

  1. U.S.- Belarus Relations - U.S. Embassy in Belarus
  2. Visits By Foreign Leaders of Belarus - Office of the Historian
  3. Trump's Ukraine envoy to meet Belarus' Lukashenko
  4. Belarus Frees an American and 2 Others as It Tries to Thaw Relations
  5. US presidential envoy plans to meet with Belarusian president soon
  6. Koti | Kellogg's
  7. Kellogg to meet Lukashenko in highest-ranking US visit to Belarus in years
  8. Historiamme - Kellogg's

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly facilitated the release of these prisoners.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly facilitated the release of these prisoners.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly facilitated the release of these prisoners.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly led to the release of prisoners.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly led to the release of prisoners.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly led to the release of prisoners.

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kellogg plans explosive trip to Belarus for peace talks with Lukashenko
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kellogg plans explosive trip to Belarus for peace talks with Lukashenko

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kellogg plans explosive trip to Belarus for peace talks with Lukashenko

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly led to the release of political prisoners.
Partially True

Fact Check: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly led to the release of political prisoners.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kellogg's visit to Minsk directly led to the release of political prisoners.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kellogg's trip could be cancelled at short notice due to delicate negotiations
True

Fact Check: Kellogg's trip could be cancelled at short notice due to delicate negotiations

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kellogg's trip could be cancelled at short notice due to delicate negotiations

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Kellogg would be highest-ranking US official to visit Belarus in years | TruthOrFake Blog