TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Justice Thomas calls for even more limits on civil rights lawsuits.

Fact Check: Justice Thomas calls for even more limits on civil rights lawsuits.

Published June 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: Justice Thomas Calls for Even More Limits on Civil Rights Lawsuits ## What We Know The claim that Justice Clarence Thomas has called fo...

Fact Check: Justice Thomas Calls for Even More Limits on Civil Rights Lawsuits

What We Know

The claim that Justice Clarence Thomas has called for more limits on civil rights lawsuits stems from his ongoing criticism of civil rights laws and their interpretations. In a recent opinion, Thomas has expressed a desire to "reexamine" the implications of civil rights legislation that has been in place for over 150 years. This suggests a potential inclination towards limiting the scope of civil rights protections, particularly regarding how they are enforced in the courts.

In the context of the Supreme Court's recent decisions, there has been a noticeable trend towards restricting the power of federal courts in civil rights cases. For instance, the Court has recently limited the use of universal injunctions, which have been a tool for civil rights advocates to challenge federal policies that they believe violate civil rights protections (NPR). This trend aligns with Thomas's judicial philosophy, which often favors a more constrained interpretation of civil rights laws.

Analysis

The reliability of the sources discussing Justice Thomas's views varies. The Newsweek article provides a direct quote from Thomas, indicating his intent to revisit longstanding civil rights laws, which adds credibility to the claim that he is advocating for limits on civil rights lawsuits. However, the interpretation of his statements can be subjective, and the implications of his views are often debated among legal scholars and commentators.

Additionally, the broader context of Supreme Court decisions, such as those reported by the Washington Post and New York Times, indicates a shift in judicial attitudes that could support Thomas's perspective. However, these articles do not directly attribute a call for more limits on civil rights lawsuits specifically to Thomas, which complicates the claim's validity.

The potential bias in reporting should also be considered. Publications like Newsweek may have a particular editorial stance that influences how Thomas's opinions are framed. Therefore, while there is evidence of Thomas's critical stance towards civil rights laws, the extent to which he is actively calling for "even more limits" remains somewhat ambiguous and open to interpretation.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that Justice Thomas is calling for more limits on civil rights lawsuits is supported by his expressed desire to reexamine civil rights laws, but the implications of this stance are complex and require further investigation. The context of recent Supreme Court rulings suggests a trend that aligns with his views, yet the direct connection to a call for more limits is not definitively established in the available sources. More comprehensive analysis and additional sources would be necessary to fully assess the validity of this claim.

Sources

  1. 23-477 United States v. Skrmetti (06/18/2025)
  2. PDF Order List (06/02/2025) - Supreme Court of the United States
  3. Civil rights groups warn that the decision involving birthright ...
  4. Supreme Court decisions expected in major cases - Washington Post
  5. The Supreme Court has limited universal injunctions. What ...
  6. Courts Will Have to Grapple With New Limits on Their Power
  7. Clarence Thomas Urges 'Reexamination' of 150-Year-Old Civil Rights ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: It's actually on TikTok. Welcome to the cookout. You see, our people are now claiming our indigenous status. Look at our brother here. Tax exemption ID. Government ID of the Chihamaru Republic. This is really happening. We got another beloved sister here who received her tribal screening back. Positive Indigenous to the Americans. And even myself, I was able to get my screening done. Positive to the Americans. Ladies and gentlemen, if you want to know how I did this, all I need you to do is share this video, repost it, like, and comment. That's all I need from you, okay? And I'll show you guys how to correct your status back to Indigenous American. I love you. This is what I got on my momma. Let's do it. All right, so we corrected your status. We're not talking about the usual runaround you get where you're paying people and they're sending you templates and you gotta mail all of it, no. All right? What we're doing is we're taking a tribal screening through the Aboriginal Ministry of Justice. These are the requirements you will need to pass that tribal screening. You must currently domicile within the United States, born within America, North, Central, or South, parents or grandparents born within America, directly or indirectly experienced genocide, which for us, slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, directly or indirectly experienced denationalization. Now, this right here is when they strip you of your nation, if you're black, Negro, Cherokee, mulatto, all type of different names, okay? So the cost of this is $75 for adults, $50 for kids.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: It's actually on TikTok. Welcome to the cookout. You see, our people are now claiming our indigenous status. Look at our brother here. Tax exemption ID. Government ID of the Chihamaru Republic. This is really happening. We got another beloved sister here who received her tribal screening back. Positive Indigenous to the Americans. And even myself, I was able to get my screening done. Positive to the Americans. Ladies and gentlemen, if you want to know how I did this, all I need you to do is share this video, repost it, like, and comment. That's all I need from you, okay? And I'll show you guys how to correct your status back to Indigenous American. I love you. This is what I got on my momma. Let's do it. All right, so we corrected your status. We're not talking about the usual runaround you get where you're paying people and they're sending you templates and you gotta mail all of it, no. All right? What we're doing is we're taking a tribal screening through the Aboriginal Ministry of Justice. These are the requirements you will need to pass that tribal screening. You must currently domicile within the United States, born within America, North, Central, or South, parents or grandparents born within America, directly or indirectly experienced genocide, which for us, slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, directly or indirectly experienced denationalization. Now, this right here is when they strip you of your nation, if you're black, Negro, Cherokee, mulatto, all type of different names, okay? So the cost of this is $75 for adults, $50 for kids.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: It's actually on TikTok. Welcome to the cookout. You see, our people are now claiming our indigenous status. Look at our brother here. Tax exemption ID. Government ID of the Chihamaru Republic. This is really happening. We got another beloved sister here who received her tribal screening back. Positive Indigenous to the Americans. And even myself, I was able to get my screening done. Positive to the Americans. Ladies and gentlemen, if you want to know how I did this, all I need you to do is share this video, repost it, like, and comment. That's all I need from you, okay? And I'll show you guys how to correct your status back to Indigenous American. I love you. This is what I got on my momma. Let's do it. All right, so we corrected your status. We're not talking about the usual runaround you get where you're paying people and they're sending you templates and you gotta mail all of it, no. All right? What we're doing is we're taking a tribal screening through the Aboriginal Ministry of Justice. These are the requirements you will need to pass that tribal screening. You must currently domicile within the United States, born within America, North, Central, or South, parents or grandparents born within America, directly or indirectly experienced genocide, which for us, slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, directly or indirectly experienced denationalization. Now, this right here is when they strip you of your nation, if you're black, Negro, Cherokee, mulatto, all type of different names, okay? So the cost of this is $75 for adults, $50 for kids.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Justice For Illinois Detention Victims If you were incarcerated at an Illinois Juvenile Detention Center, then you need to watch this video. I know it’s a hard subject to talk about, but over <redacted_us_address>, then you might be eligible for compensation even if the abuse happened decades ago. Click below to see if you qualify to file a free claim.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Justice For Illinois Detention Victims If you were incarcerated at an Illinois Juvenile Detention Center, then you need to watch this video. I know it’s a hard subject to talk about, but over <redacted_us_address>, then you might be eligible for compensation even if the abuse happened decades ago. Click below to see if you qualify to file a free claim.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice For Illinois Detention Victims If you were incarcerated at an Illinois Juvenile Detention Center, then you need to watch this video. I know it’s a hard subject to talk about, but over <redacted_us_address>, then you might be eligible for compensation even if the abuse happened decades ago. Click below to see if you qualify to file a free claim.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The International Justice Tribunal wants to eat the Letter F
False

Fact Check: The International Justice Tribunal wants to eat the Letter F

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Justice Tribunal wants to eat the Letter F

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.
Partially True

Fact Check: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Justice Thomas calls for even more limits on civil rights lawsuits. | TruthOrFake Blog