Fact Check: Justice Sotomayor's dissent lasted nearly 20 minutes, a rare occurrence.

Fact Check: Justice Sotomayor's dissent lasted nearly 20 minutes, a rare occurrence.

Published June 29, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Justice Sotomayor's dissent lasted nearly 20 minutes, a rare occurrence." ## What We Know Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently delivered a...

Fact Check: "Justice Sotomayor's dissent lasted nearly 20 minutes, a rare occurrence."

What We Know

Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently delivered a dissenting opinion that lasted nearly 20 minutes, which has been noted as a significant duration for a dissent in the Supreme Court. This event occurred during a ruling related to former President Donald Trump's immunity from prosecution, where Sotomayor criticized the majority opinion, stating it allowed a president to act as a "king above the law" (AP News). The dissent was characterized by its weighty delivery, with Sotomayor emphasizing her points through pauses and pronounced articulation (Politico).

Analysis

The claim that Sotomayor's dissent lasted nearly 20 minutes is supported by multiple sources, including reports from AP News and Politico. Both sources confirm the duration of the dissent and highlight its rarity, as reading a dissent aloud from the bench is not a common practice among justices.

While the exact frequency of lengthy dissents is not detailed in the sources, the context suggests that Sotomayor's nearly 20-minute reading is indeed notable. The Supreme Court typically operates under a system where justices may not read their dissents aloud, making this instance particularly remarkable.

However, the sources do not provide comprehensive historical data on the length of past dissents or the frequency of justices reading them aloud, which would be necessary to fully assess the rarity of this occurrence. Therefore, while the claim is substantiated by credible reports, a broader historical perspective is needed to definitively categorize it as "rare."

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the claim that Justice Sotomayor's dissent lasted nearly 20 minutes is accurate and supported by reliable sources, the assertion that this is a "rare occurrence" lacks sufficient historical context. More research is needed to compare this dissent's length and the practice of reading dissents aloud against historical norms within the Supreme Court.

Sources

  1. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
  2. Sotomayor's dissent: A president should not be a 'king above the law
  3. Justice Sotomayor dissents on birthright ruling
  4. Sotomayor reads her dissent again - Live Updates
  5. Last name 和 First name 到底哪个是名哪个是姓? - 知乎
  6. 「有期徒刑一年,缓刑两年」是什么意思? - 知乎
  7. Sotomayor still reading dissent - Live Updates
  8. 知乎知学堂 - 知乎

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The International Justice Tribunal wants to eat the Letter F
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The International Justice Tribunal wants to eat the Letter F

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The International Justice Tribunal wants to eat the Letter F

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Ukraine's President
Zalinski has just banned yet
another political opposition
party. One that questioned his
legitimacy as president and
used Ukraine's Department of
Justice to mandate the seizure
of this party's members assets.
He began banning
major political opposition
parties in twenty twenty-two.
He also started banning TV
channels that were associated
00:33
with his political opponents
and he took over total control
of Ukraine's largest television
networks. Now controlled by
their government. Zelinski's
presidential term ended on May
20th. He cancelled elections in
the name of martial law
suspending Ukraine's
constitution.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Ukraine's President Zalinski has just banned yet another political opposition party. One that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members assets. He began banning major political opposition parties in twenty twenty-two. He also started banning TV channels that were associated 00:33 with his political opponents and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks. Now controlled by their government. Zelinski's presidential term ended on May 20th. He cancelled elections in the name of martial law suspending Ukraine's constitution.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: . WWE legend The The Undertaker: "Israel is a bastard state built on blood and lies. No justice, no peace for for killers of children." 슈
True

Fact Check: . WWE legend The The Undertaker: "Israel is a bastard state built on blood and lies. No justice, no peace for for killers of children." 슈

Detailed fact-check analysis of: . WWE legend The The Undertaker: "Israel is a bastard state built on blood and lies. No justice, no peace for for killers of children." 슈

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jared Fogle appeared in a Justice League comic
True

Fact Check: Jared Fogle appeared in a Justice League comic

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jared Fogle appeared in a Justice League comic

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Justice For Illinois Detention Victims
If you were incarcerated at an Illinois Juvenile Detention Center, then you need to watch this video. I know it’s a hard subject to talk about, but over <redacted_us_address>, then you might be eligible for compensation even if the abuse happened decades ago.
Click below to see if you qualify to file a free claim.
Unverified

Fact Check: Justice For Illinois Detention Victims If you were incarcerated at an Illinois Juvenile Detention Center, then you need to watch this video. I know it’s a hard subject to talk about, but over <redacted_us_address>, then you might be eligible for compensation even if the abuse happened decades ago. Click below to see if you qualify to file a free claim.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Justice For Illinois Detention Victims If you were incarcerated at an Illinois Juvenile Detention Center, then you need to watch this video. I know it’s a hard subject to talk about, but over <redacted_us_address>, then you might be eligible for compensation even if the abuse happened decades ago. Click below to see if you qualify to file a free claim.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →