Fact Check: Justice Barrett has become the Republican-appointed justice most likely to be in the majority in decisions that reach a liberal outcome, according to a 2023 analysis.

Fact Check: Justice Barrett has become the Republican-appointed justice most likely to be in the majority in decisions that reach a liberal outcome, according to a 2023 analysis.

Published June 15, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Justice Barrett has become the Republican-appointed justice most likely to be in the majority in decisions that reach a liberal outcome...

Fact Check: "Justice Barrett has become the Republican-appointed justice most likely to be in the majority in decisions that reach a liberal outcome, according to a 2023 analysis."

What We Know

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, appointed by former President Donald Trump, has recently been analyzed as the Republican-appointed justice most frequently aligning with liberal outcomes in Supreme Court decisions. According to a report from The New York Times, Barrett's voting patterns show a significant increase in her alignment with the liberal justices, particularly noted in her joining Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan in nonunanimous decisions 82% of the time during the 2023 term, a marked increase from 39% in her first term. This trend has led to criticism from some conservative circles, with figures close to Trump expressing disappointment over her perceived "leftward drift" (source-3).

Barrett's voting record indicates that while she generally supports conservative outcomes, her willingness to side with liberal justices has positioned her as a pivotal figure within the court. The analysis conducted for The New York Times suggests that her influence is on the rise, as she often finds herself in the majority on decisions that yield liberal outcomes (source-1).

Analysis

The claim that Justice Barrett has become the Republican-appointed justice most likely to be in the majority in decisions that reach a liberal outcome is supported by multiple sources. The New York Times report highlights Barrett's increasing frequency of siding with liberal justices, which has raised eyebrows among her conservative supporters (source-1). This shift is further corroborated by a report from Raw Story, which notes that her voting patterns have led to frustration among Trump's allies, who expected a more consistently conservative stance.

However, it is important to consider the context of these findings. While Barrett's alignment with liberal outcomes has increased, her overall voting record still reflects a conservative ideology. For instance, she has been noted as the fourth most conservative justice according to a separate analysis (source-6). This suggests that while she may be more frequently siding with liberal justices than expected, it does not necessarily indicate a complete ideological shift.

The reliability of the sources is generally high, with The New York Times being a reputable publication known for its thorough reporting. The analysis referenced is based on empirical data from Supreme Court decisions, which adds credibility to the findings. However, it is essential to recognize the potential for bias in interpretations of Barrett's decisions, as both conservative and liberal commentators have expressed strong opinions about her judicial philosophy (source-3, source-7).

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The claim that Justice Barrett has become the Republican-appointed justice most likely to be in the majority in decisions that reach a liberal outcome is substantiated by credible analyses of her voting patterns. While her overall record remains conservative, the significant increase in her alignment with liberal justices, particularly in the 2023 term, supports the assertion. This trend has elicited mixed reactions from both conservative and liberal factions, highlighting the complexities of her role on the Supreme Court.

Sources

  1. How Amy Coney Barrett Is Confounding the Right and the Left
  2. US Supreme Court's Barrett asserts conservative power, but favors narrower approach
  3. 'We had too much hope for her': Justice Coney Barrett has Trump allies fuming
  4. In Barrett's first term, conservative majority is dominant but divided
  5. PDF Supreme Court Stat Review - Empirical SCOTUS
  6. Amy Coney Barrett
  7. The last best hope for Supreme Court liberals: Amy Coney Barrett
  8. 6 to 3: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Conservative Super-Majority

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein.

wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ.

how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ.

so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times.

The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump.

oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work?

does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you.

we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’

you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls.

it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is.

let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time:

‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Epstein client list never existed according to the US Department of Justice.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Epstein client list never existed according to the US Department of Justice.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Epstein client list never existed according to the US Department of Justice.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein's client list does not exist according to the Justice Department.
True

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein's client list does not exist according to the Justice Department.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein's client list does not exist according to the Justice Department.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing
Partially True

Fact Check: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the United States, approximately 13.6% of police officers are Black. This translates to roughly 12% of local police officers being Black, a figure that has remained consistent since 1997, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data from 2020 indicates that 16% of officers in large departments serving one million or more people were Black, while nationally, the percentage is closer to 12%, according to The Sentencing

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Education in the West has become a propaganda machine for Marxist social justice.
Partially True

Fact Check: Education in the West has become a propaganda machine for Marxist social justice.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Education in the West has become a propaganda machine for Marxist social justice.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →