Fact Check: Jury deliberated for at least 22 hours before reaching a verdict.

Fact Check: Jury deliberated for at least 22 hours before reaching a verdict.

Published June 19, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Jury deliberated for at least 22 hours before reaching a verdict." ## What We Know The claim that the jury deliberated for at least 22...

Fact Check: "Jury deliberated for at least 22 hours before reaching a verdict."

What We Know

The claim that the jury deliberated for at least 22 hours before reaching a verdict pertains to the retrial of Karen Read, who faced serious charges including second-degree murder. According to reports, the jury began its deliberations on June 13, 2025, and ultimately took a total of about 22 hours over the course of four days to reach a verdict, which was announced on June 18, 2025 (MassLive, MyFox8). This duration of deliberation is consistent with the variability observed in jury deliberations, which can range widely depending on the complexity of the case (LegalKnowledgeBase).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, as multiple credible sources confirm that the jury in the Karen Read retrial deliberated for approximately 22 hours. The reports from MassLive and MyFox8 explicitly state the duration of the jury's deliberation, corroborating the claim.

Additionally, the variability in jury deliberation times is well-documented. Legal analysts note that deliberation periods can range from mere minutes to several days or even weeks, depending on the case's complexity (LegalKnowledgeBase). This context helps to understand that a 22-hour deliberation is not unusual, especially in a case involving serious charges like murder.

The sources cited are reliable and come from established news outlets and legal knowledge platforms, which enhances the credibility of the information provided. There is no indication of bias in the reporting, as the facts are presented straightforwardly without sensationalism.

Conclusion

The claim that the jury deliberated for at least 22 hours before reaching a verdict is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms the duration of the jury's deliberation in the Karen Read retrial, aligning with the reported timeline and legal context.

Sources

  1. Verdict reached in Karen Read retrial
  2. How long do juries usually deliberate? - LegalKnowledgeBase.com
  3. Karen Read retrial: Jury finds Read not guilty of second ...
  4. Deliberations in the Jury Room

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder after intense jury deliberation.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder after intense jury deliberation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Karen Read found not guilty of second-degree murder after intense jury deliberation.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mike Lindell stated during the trial that he would appeal the jury's financial award to Eric Coomer and would continue to speak out against electronic voting machines.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Mike Lindell stated during the trial that he would appeal the jury's financial award to Eric Coomer and would continue to speak out against electronic voting machines.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mike Lindell stated during the trial that he would appeal the jury's financial award to Eric Coomer and would continue to speak out against electronic voting machines.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, a former security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting Systems, and ordered Lindell to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages on June 5, 2025.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, a former security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting Systems, and ordered Lindell to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages on June 5, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, a former security and product strategy director at Dominion Voting Systems, and ordered Lindell to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages on June 5, 2025.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems, and ordered Lindell to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages on June 5, 2025.
True

Fact Check: A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems, and ordered Lindell to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages on June 5, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A federal jury in Colorado found that Mike Lindell defamed Eric Coomer, a former employee of Dominion Voting Systems, and ordered Lindell to pay Coomer $2.3 million in damages on June 5, 2025.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Steven Kramer, a political operative from New Orleans, was acquitted on all charges by a Belknap County Superior Court jury for orchestrating robocalls that used an AI-generated voice mimicking President Biden.
True

Fact Check: Steven Kramer, a political operative from New Orleans, was acquitted on all charges by a Belknap County Superior Court jury for orchestrating robocalls that used an AI-generated voice mimicking President Biden.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Steven Kramer, a political operative from New Orleans, was acquitted on all charges by a Belknap County Superior Court jury for orchestrating robocalls that used an AI-generated voice mimicking President Biden.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The jury deadlocked on six counts against Michael Madigan, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.
True

Fact Check: The jury deadlocked on six counts against Michael Madigan, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The jury deadlocked on six counts against Michael Madigan, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →