Fact Check: Judge bars demolition of mobile home park amid pending lawsuits.

Fact Check: Judge bars demolition of mobile home park amid pending lawsuits.

Published June 28, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: Judge bars demolition of mobile home park amid pending lawsuits ## What We Know A recent ruling from a Grays Harbor County Superior Cou...

Fact Check: Judge bars demolition of mobile home park amid pending lawsuits

What We Know

A recent ruling from a Grays Harbor County Superior Court judge has ordered the owners of an Ilwaco mobile home park to pay significant penalties for unlawful eviction and utility shut-off notices issued to residents. The judge's decision included a total penalty of $926,500, reflecting the severity of the violations against the residents, which included protected classes such as the elderly and low-income individuals (Attorney General's Office).

In a separate case, a Michigan mobile home park was also subject to a court order that barred any demolition while pending lawsuits were active against the park (MLive). This indicates a trend where courts are taking steps to protect residents from potential harm during ongoing legal disputes.

Analysis

The claim that a judge has barred the demolition of a mobile home park amid pending lawsuits is partially true. The ruling from the Grays Harbor County Superior Court specifically addresses unlawful actions taken by the park owners, leading to significant penalties. However, it does not explicitly mention a bar on demolition in the context of the Ilwaco mobile home park case.

The ruling reflects a broader judicial trend of protecting tenants during litigation, as seen in the Michigan case where a judge issued a temporary restraining order against demolition while lawsuits are pending. This suggests that courts are increasingly cautious about allowing actions that could further harm vulnerable tenants during legal disputes (MLive).

The source from the Attorney General's Office is credible and provides detailed information about the penalties and the context of the violations, indicating a serious legal situation for the park owners (Attorney General's Office). In contrast, the Michigan case serves as an example of judicial caution but does not directly relate to the Ilwaco situation.

Conclusion

The verdict is Partially True. While there are instances of judges barring demolition in cases involving mobile home parks amid pending lawsuits, the specific claim regarding the Ilwaco mobile home park does not explicitly state such a bar on demolition. Instead, it focuses on penalties for unlawful actions by the park owners. The trend of judicial protection for tenants during litigation is evident, but the details of each case vary.

Sources

  1. PDF PUBLISHED - United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  2. Judge orders $926K in penalties against Ilwaco mobile home park owners ...
  3. 2 months after shutoff, court orders Michigan mobile home park to ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Judge bars demolition of mobile home park amid pending lawsuits. | TruthOrFake Blog