Fact Check: Journalists face criminal litigation for exposing Sodalitium's abuses
What We Know
The claim that journalists face criminal litigation for exposing the abuses of Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, a Catholic organization in Peru, is substantiated by various reports and legal cases involving investigative journalist Paola Ugaz. Ugaz has been at the forefront of reporting on allegations of sexual, physical, and psychological abuse within Sodalitium, co-authoring a book titled Mitad Monjes, Mitad Soldados which details these allegations (Media Defence). Since her reporting, she has faced multiple lawsuits, including criminal defamation charges, which are often seen as a form of judicial harassment aimed at silencing her and other journalists (American Bar Association).
In 2020, Ugaz was sued by Luciano Revoredo, the director of a Catholic news website, for statements she made regarding the coverage of her legal battles, which he claimed were defamatory. This lawsuit is part of a broader trend in Peru where powerful individuals use legal means to intimidate journalists (Media Defence). Additionally, the Peruvian Public Prosecutor’s Office has opened investigations against her based on dubious allegations, including money laundering, which have been criticized for lacking credible evidence (Media Defence).
Analysis
The evidence supporting the claim is robust, as multiple sources confirm that Paola Ugaz has faced criminal litigation as a direct consequence of her investigative work on Sodalitium. The lawsuits against her are not isolated incidents but part of a systematic pattern of judicial harassment against journalists in Peru, particularly those reporting on sensitive issues involving powerful entities (American Bar Association, Crux Now).
The credibility of the sources reporting on Ugaz's situation is generally high. Media Defence, for example, is an organization dedicated to supporting journalists facing legal challenges, and their reports are detailed and well-researched. The American Bar Association is also a reputable source, providing insights into human rights and legal issues. However, it is essential to note that while these sources are credible, they may have an advocacy angle, focusing on the protection of press freedom.
The ongoing legal battles faced by Ugaz, including the recent acquittal in one defamation case, highlight the precarious nature of press freedom in Peru. The legal framework, particularly laws regarding defamation, can be manipulated to suppress dissenting voices, which is a significant concern for journalists (Media Defence, American Bar Association).
Conclusion
The claim that journalists face criminal litigation for exposing Sodalitium's abuses is True. Paola Ugaz's experiences illustrate a broader trend of judicial harassment against journalists in Peru, particularly those investigating powerful organizations. The legal actions taken against her are indicative of attempts to intimidate and silence those who report on sensitive issues, thereby posing a significant threat to freedom of expression in the region.
