Fact Check: "Jose Antonio Kast's support skyrockets to 24% in latest poll!"
What We Know
The claim that "Jose Antonio Kast's support skyrockets to 24% in latest poll" has surfaced in various discussions, particularly in the context of Chilean politics. However, as of the latest available data, there is no credible polling evidence to substantiate this assertion.
Polling data from reputable sources such as Cadem and Pulso Ciudadano indicate that Kast's support is significantly lower than 24%. For instance, a recent Cadem poll reported Kast's support at approximately 14%, while Pulso Ciudadano indicated a similar trend with figures around 12-15% (Cadem, Pulso Ciudadano).
Analysis
The claim appears to be exaggerated or misrepresented. The sources that report on Kast's approval ratings are well-regarded polling organizations in Chile. Cadem, for example, is known for its rigorous methodologies and has been tracking public opinion in Chile for years. Their latest data suggests that while Kast has seen some fluctuations in support, the figures do not support the claim of a jump to 24% (Cadem).
Moreover, the context of the claim is essential. Political support can be volatile, especially in the lead-up to elections. However, without a specific poll backing the 24% figure, it is misleading to present such a claim as fact. The sources that do report on Kast's support levels indicate a more stable but lower percentage, which reflects the current political climate in Chile (Pulso Ciudadano).
In evaluating the reliability of the sources, both Cadem and Pulso Ciudadano have established reputations for accuracy in political polling. They utilize scientifically valid sampling methods and provide transparency in their methodologies, making them credible sources for public opinion data.
Conclusion
The claim that "Jose Antonio Kast's support skyrockets to 24% in latest poll" is False. The available polling data indicates that his support is significantly lower, around 12-15%, according to reputable polling organizations. The assertion lacks credible backing and misrepresents the current political landscape in Chile.
