TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: JD Vance would make a better president than Donald Trump

Fact Check: JD Vance would make a better president than Donald Trump

Published April 12, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# JD Vance Would Make a Better President Than Donald Trump: A Fact-Check ## Introduction The claim that "JD Vance would make a better president than ...

JD Vance Would Make a Better President Than Donald Trump: A Fact-Check

Introduction

The claim that "JD Vance would make a better president than Donald Trump" has surfaced in various political discussions, particularly in the context of Vance's recent selection as Trump's vice-presidential running mate for the 2024 election. This assertion invites scrutiny of both Vance's qualifications and the comparative merits of his potential presidency versus that of Trump, who has a controversial political history.

What We Know

  1. JD Vance's Background: JD Vance is a U.S. Senator from Ohio and gained national attention with his memoir "Hillbilly Elegy," which discusses his upbringing and the socio-economic challenges faced by many in Appalachia 13.

  2. Relationship with Trump: Vance's relationship with Trump has evolved significantly. Initially, he was a vocal critic, comparing Trump to Hitler during the 2016 election cycle 24. However, he later became a staunch supporter, culminating in his selection as Trump's running mate for the 2024 election 810.

  3. Public Perception and Political Standing: Vance is considered a rising star within the Republican Party, with some party members already positioning him as a potential candidate for the 2028 presidential election 10. His supporters argue that his background and ability to connect with working-class voters make him a strong candidate for future leadership.

  4. Criticism of Qualifications: Critics have raised concerns about Vance's qualifications for the vice presidency and potential presidency, arguing that his political experience is limited and questioning his ability to lead effectively 64.

Analysis

The claim that JD Vance would make a better president than Donald Trump is subjective and heavily dependent on individual political beliefs.

  • Source Credibility: The sources discussing Vance's qualifications and political history vary in reliability. For instance, articles from established news organizations like BBC and Reuters provide factual reporting but may also reflect editorial biases based on their political leanings 12. In contrast, opinion pieces from platforms like MSNBC and Palm Beach Post may present more subjective views, which could influence the reader's perception of Vance's capabilities 56.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have inherent biases. For example, Politico, while generally reputable, often caters to a political audience that may have a vested interest in promoting certain narratives about candidates 89.

  • Methodological Concerns: The analysis of Vance's potential as president often relies on anecdotal evidence and public opinion rather than rigorous polling or comprehensive studies. This can lead to skewed interpretations of his qualifications and public support.

  • Comparative Analysis: Evaluating Vance against Trump involves examining their respective policies, leadership styles, and public reception. Trump's presidency was marked by significant controversy, while Vance's political career is still in its early stages, making direct comparisons challenging.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The assertion that JD Vance would make a better president than Donald Trump remains unverified due to the subjective nature of the claim and the lack of concrete evidence supporting either position. Key evidence includes Vance's evolving relationship with Trump, his rising status within the Republican Party, and the criticisms regarding his qualifications for higher office.

However, the evaluation of Vance's potential presidency is complicated by the fact that his political career is still in its infancy, and opinions about his capabilities are heavily influenced by individual political beliefs. Additionally, the sources consulted vary in credibility and may reflect biases that affect their portrayal of Vance's qualifications.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, as much of the analysis relies on anecdotal accounts and public sentiment rather than rigorous data. As such, readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider multiple perspectives before forming their own conclusions.

Sources

  1. A quick guide to the US vice-president JD Vance. BBC. Link
  2. JD Vance once compared Trump to Hitler. Now, he is ... Reuters. Link
  3. JD Vance: The 'hillbilly' Maga loyalist who is now vice- ... BBC. Link
  4. Fact-checking JD Vance's past statements and relationship with Trump. PBS. Link
  5. Could Trump, JD Vance or Dan Bongino pass the citizenship test? MSNBC. Link
  6. JD Vance isn't qualified for VP because he's not ... Palm Beach Post. Link
  7. J.D. Vance And Donald Trump's Complicated History Explained. Grunge. Link
  8. 55 Things to Know About JD Vance, Trump's VP Pick. Politico. Link
  9. J.D. Vance for Trump's VP? Here are the pros and cons of the 8 ... Politico. Link
  10. Republicans are getting in line behind Vance for 2028: 'I think it's ... Independent. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: jd vance once said trump is a really bad candidate , and later on he stood for trump saying he officially accept nomination to be vp of america
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: jd vance once said trump is a really bad candidate , and later on he stood for trump saying he officially accept nomination to be vp of america

Detailed fact-check analysis of: jd vance once said trump is a really bad candidate , and later on he stood for trump saying he officially accept nomination to be vp of america

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did insulting Trump or JD Vance is currently considered as a crime in United States
False

Fact Check: Did insulting Trump or JD Vance is currently considered as a crime in United States

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did insulting Trump or JD Vance is currently considered as a crime in United States

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Scammers stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency impersonating the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee.
True

Fact Check: Scammers stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency impersonating the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Scammers stole hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency impersonating the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jasmine Crockett SUES JD Vance for $100M
Unverified

Fact Check: Jasmine Crockett SUES JD Vance for $100M

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jasmine Crockett SUES JD Vance for $100M

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks