Fact Check: "It's unclear if Pitt was specifically targeted by the burglars."
What We Know
On June 26, 2025, reports emerged about a burglary at a home in Los Angeles that is reportedly owned by actor Brad Pitt. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed that three suspects broke into the residence, ransacked it, and fled with various items. Officer Drake Madison, who provided details about the incident, stated that he could not confirm the identity of the homeowner or the specifics of what was stolen from the property (AP News).
While the police have confirmed the break-in, they have not provided any evidence to suggest that the burglars specifically targeted Pitt. The report indicates that Pitt was not at home during the incident, as he was on a promotional tour for his movie "F1" (NBC News).
Analysis
The claim that it is unclear if Pitt was specifically targeted by the burglars is supported by the available evidence. The police have not indicated any motives or connections that would suggest the burglars had a specific interest in Pitt or his property. Officer Madison's statement reflects a lack of information regarding the homeowner's identity and the nature of the burglary, which further complicates any assumptions about targeting (NBC News).
Moreover, the media coverage surrounding the incident has focused primarily on the fact that the home was owned by Pitt, rather than any specific targeting. This could suggest that the attention on Pitt may stem more from his celebrity status than from any concrete evidence of targeted criminal activity (Hollywood Reporter).
In evaluating the reliability of the sources, both the AP News and NBC News are established news organizations known for their journalistic standards. However, the lack of detailed information from law enforcement means that the narrative is largely speculative at this stage.
Conclusion
The verdict on the claim is "Partially True." While it is accurate to say that it is unclear if Pitt was specifically targeted by the burglars, this uncertainty arises from the lack of evidence rather than a definitive conclusion. The police have not confirmed any targeting, and the circumstances of the burglary do not provide enough information to support the idea that Pitt was a specific target.