Fact Check: it says jews can steal from gentiles in the talmud

Fact Check: it says jews can steal from gentiles in the talmud

Published May 14, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Claim Analysis: "It says Jews can steal from Gentiles in the Talmud" ## 1. Introduction The claim that "it says Jews can steal from Gentiles in the...

Claim Analysis: "It says Jews can steal from Gentiles in the Talmud"

1. Introduction

The claim that "it says Jews can steal from Gentiles in the Talmud" has circulated in various forms, often used to support antisemitic narratives. This assertion suggests that Jewish texts condone or permit theft from non-Jews, which raises significant ethical and theological questions. The Talmud, a central text in Rabbinic Judaism, is complex and often misinterpreted. This article will explore the available sources to assess the validity of this claim without reaching a definitive conclusion.

2. What We Know

The Talmud is a compilation of rabbinic discussions pertaining to Jewish law, ethics, customs, and history. It consists of the Mishnah and the Gemara, and is considered a foundational text in Judaism.

  1. Talmudic Texts: Some sources reference Talmudic passages that discuss the treatment of Gentiles. For example, one source claims that the Talmud states, "Gentiles may not rob each other. The Gentile may not rob the Jews. But the Jews may at any time rob the Gentiles" 1. However, this interpretation is highly contested and lacks context.

  2. Prohibitions Against Theft: Other sources clarify that Jewish law explicitly forbids stealing from Gentiles. For instance, a source notes that "it is forbidden from the Torah to steal, and one may not even steal from a non-Jew" 8. This aligns with the broader ethical teachings found in Jewish law, which emphasize the importance of honesty and integrity.

  3. Halachic Interpretations: Some texts discuss the nuances of Jewish law regarding theft from non-Jews. For example, it is mentioned that stealing from a Gentile is considered a greater sin than stealing from a Jew due to the potential for desecration of God's name 10. This suggests that the moral implications of theft are taken seriously within Jewish law.

  4. Contextual Misinterpretations: A source addressing antisemitism notes that claims about the Talmud permitting theft from Gentiles often lack context and are based on selective quotations 5. This highlights the need for careful interpretation of religious texts.

3. Analysis

The claim that the Talmud permits Jews to steal from Gentiles is rooted in specific interpretations of Talmudic texts, but these interpretations are not universally accepted.

  • Source Reliability: The sources that support the claim, such as 1 and 2, may lack scholarly rigor and are often cited in contexts that promote antisemitic views. For example, the first source is part of a collection that has been criticized for its selective presentation of Talmudic material. In contrast, sources like 7 and 10 provide a more nuanced view of Jewish law, emphasizing the prohibition against theft regardless of the victim's identity.

  • Bias and Agenda: Some sources, particularly those that propagate antisemitic narratives, may have inherent biases that affect their interpretations. The Online Hate Prevention Institute's analysis 5 indicates that many claims about the Talmud are rooted in historical prejudice rather than accurate representations of Jewish law.

  • Methodological Concerns: The methodology behind claims that Jews can steal from Gentiles often involves quoting Talmudic passages without providing the necessary context or understanding of Jewish legal principles. This selective quoting can lead to misinterpretations that serve specific agendas.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that the Talmud permits Jews to steal from Gentiles is false. Key evidence against this assertion includes the explicit prohibitions against theft found in Jewish law, which apply universally, regardless of the victim's identity. Various sources clarify that Jewish teachings emphasize integrity and honesty, and stealing from a Gentile is viewed as a serious transgression.

However, it is important to acknowledge that interpretations of Talmudic texts can vary, and some may misrepresent these texts to support antisemitic narratives. The complexity of the Talmud and the potential for selective quoting necessitate careful analysis and context when discussing its teachings.

While the evidence presented here strongly supports the conclusion that the claim is false, it is essential to recognize the limitations of available evidence. The interpretations of religious texts can be influenced by cultural and historical contexts, and further scholarly examination may provide additional insights.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the broader context when encountering claims about religious texts, particularly those that may perpetuate stereotypes or biases.

5. Sources

  1. What is the Talmud? - Calvin University: https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/story5.htm
  2. Theft From Gentiles - FreeServers: http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/theft.html
  3. The Laws of Stealing from Non-Jews - Daily Halacha: https://halachayomit.co.il/en/default.aspx?HalachaID=3359
  4. Unequal Justice? - YCT: https://library.yctorah.org/2016/07/unequal-justice-does-halakha-tolerate-unethical-behavior-towards-the-other-part-2-acts-against-property/
  5. Antisemitism based on "The Talmud" - Online Hate Prevention Institute: https://ohpi.org.au/antisemitism-based-on-the-talmud/
  6. Talmudic Attitudes to Gentiles - Yeshivat Har Etzion: https://www.etzion.org.il/en/philosophy/issues-jewish-thought/rabbinic-thought/talmudic-attitudes-gentiles-2
  7. The Laws of Stealing - Chabad.org: https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/383785/jewish/The-Laws-of-Stealing.htm
  8. Stealing from a non-Jew - halacha - Mi Yodeya: https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/35455/stealing-from-a-non-jew
  9. The Jewish Attitude Toward Gentiles - Yeshivat Har Etzion: https://www.etzion.org.il/en/philosophy/great-thinkers/rihal-kuzari/jewish-attitude-toward-gentiles-2
  10. Stealing from a Gentile - On Second Thought - Hadran: https://hadran.org.il/author-post/stealing-from-a-gentile-on-second-thought/

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) says the death toll from Trump's policies is now “estimated to be in the multiple millions
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) says the death toll from Trump's policies is now “estimated to be in the multiple millions

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Democrat Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) says the death toll from Trump's policies is now “estimated to be in the multiple millions

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Psychotic antisemite Tucker Qatarlon says Jeffrey Epstein Mossad agent. Truth is Taqatar is probably Qatari agent?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Psychotic antisemite Tucker Qatarlon says Jeffrey Epstein Mossad agent. Truth is Taqatar is probably Qatari agent?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Psychotic antisemite Tucker Qatarlon says Jeffrey Epstein Mossad agent. Truth is Taqatar is probably Qatari agent?

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Musk’s actual statement says Starlink will launch paid services in selected African countries in the next two years
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Musk’s actual statement says Starlink will launch paid services in selected African countries in the next two years

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Musk’s actual statement says Starlink will launch paid services in selected African countries in the next two years

Aug 13, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: trump says greenhouse bases are of no danger to humans.  is he wrong or just not telling the truth?
True

Fact Check: trump says greenhouse bases are of no danger to humans. is he wrong or just not telling the truth?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: trump says greenhouse bases are of no danger to humans. is he wrong or just not telling the truth?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Josh Hawley says the legislation he's proposing will send $600 tariff rebate checks to Americans, but not to "Biden voters": "This is going to the Trump blue-collar voters"
True

Fact Check: Josh Hawley says the legislation he's proposing will send $600 tariff rebate checks to Americans, but not to "Biden voters": "This is going to the Trump blue-collar voters"

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Josh Hawley says the legislation he's proposing will send $600 tariff rebate checks to Americans, but not to "Biden voters": "This is going to the Trump blue-collar voters"

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →