Fact Check: "Israeli jets were poised to attack Iran until Trump intervened."
What We Know
Recent reports indicate that tensions between Israel and Iran escalated significantly, leading to a series of military exchanges. On June 24, 2025, President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between the two nations, stating that "Israel is not going to attack Iran" and that "all planes will turn around and head home" (AP News). This announcement came after a period of intense conflict, during which both sides had launched attacks against each other, including missile strikes and air raids, resulting in casualties on both sides (New York Times).
Trump's intervention was characterized by his frustration over the ongoing hostilities, particularly after he had brokered a ceasefire agreement. He expressed disappointment that both Israel and Iran had violated the ceasefire shortly after it was announced, with Israel accusing Iran of missile launches and Iran denying any violations (New York Times). The situation was further complicated by Trump's previous orders for U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, which had already escalated tensions in the region (New York Times).
Analysis
The claim that "Israeli jets were poised to attack Iran until Trump intervened" is supported by the context surrounding Trump's announcement of the ceasefire. Reports indicate that Israeli military actions were ongoing, and there was a clear intent from Israel to respond to Iranian missile attacks (AP News, New York Times). Trump's intervention appears to have been a direct response to prevent further escalation, as he publicly urged Israel to refrain from further attacks and emphasized the need for both sides to adhere to the ceasefire (AP News).
However, the reliability of the sources reporting this information is generally high, with major news outlets like the Associated Press and The New York Times providing detailed accounts of the events. These sources are known for their journalistic standards and fact-checking processes. Nevertheless, the chaotic nature of the situation, with conflicting narratives from both Israel and Iran regarding the ceasefire violations, adds a layer of complexity to the claim (New York Times).
While Trump's announcement was significant in attempting to de-escalate the situation, it is essential to note that the extent to which Israeli jets were "poised to attack" is somewhat ambiguous. The reports do not provide explicit confirmation that an attack was imminent at the time of Trump's intervention, but rather that tensions were high and military readiness was present.
Conclusion
The claim that "Israeli jets were poised to attack Iran until Trump intervened" is Partially True. There is evidence that Israeli military actions were ongoing and that Trump intervened to prevent further escalation. However, the specifics regarding the immediacy of an attack by Israeli jets remain unclear, as the situation was fluid and characterized by mutual accusations of ceasefire violations. Thus, while Trump's intervention was crucial, the claim lacks definitive confirmation that an attack was imminent.
