TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is there evidence of Donald Trump molesting a 13-year-old?

Fact Check: Is there evidence of Donald Trump molesting a 13-year-old?

Published July 14, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: Is there evidence of Donald Trump molesting a 13-year-old? ## What We Know The claim that Donald Trump molested a 13-year-old girl prim...

Fact Check: Is there evidence of Donald Trump molesting a 13-year-old?

What We Know

The claim that Donald Trump molested a 13-year-old girl primarily stems from a lawsuit filed in 2016 by an anonymous plaintiff known as "Katie Johnson." This lawsuit alleged that Trump raped her at a party in 1994 when she was a minor. However, the case was dismissed, and the plaintiff later withdrew her allegations, stating that she felt pressured and intimidated. The circumstances surrounding this lawsuit have been described as "bizarre" and politically motivated, with Trump's attorney asserting that the allegations were "unequivocally false" (Vox, Law & Crime).

In contrast, a separate case involving E. Jean Carroll, who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a department store in the mid-1990s, resulted in a jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse in May 2023. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million, but they did not find sufficient evidence to support the claim that she was raped (AP News, New York Times). This case involved corroborative testimony from other women who alleged similar experiences with Trump, which helped establish a pattern of behavior (EVIDENCE, ADVOCACY, AND CARROLL V. TRUMP).

Analysis

The allegations regarding Trump molesting a 13-year-old are largely based on the now-dismissed lawsuit by "Katie Johnson." This case lacked substantive evidence and was characterized by the plaintiff's withdrawal under pressure, raising questions about its credibility. The legal community has largely viewed this lawsuit as politically motivated and lacking in merit (Law & Crime, Vox).

On the other hand, the E. Jean Carroll case involved a jury trial where the evidence presented included corroborative testimonies and Trump's own statements, which contributed to the jury's verdict of liability for sexual abuse. The jury's decision was based on a civil standard of proof, which is lower than that required in criminal cases (AP News, New York Times). The credibility of the witnesses and the corroborative nature of their testimonies provided a stronger foundation for the jury's decision compared to the allegations made in the Johnson case.

The sources discussing the Carroll case, including legal analyses, provide a more reliable account of Trump's behavior and the legal outcomes associated with it. In contrast, the allegations of molestation involving the 13-year-old girl have been dismissed and lack credible evidence (Reuters, Wikipedia).

Conclusion

The claim that there is evidence of Donald Trump molesting a 13-year-old is False. The allegations stem from a dismissed lawsuit that lacked credible evidence and was withdrawn by the plaintiff. In contrast, the E. Jean Carroll case, which resulted in a jury finding Trump liable for sexual abuse, does not support the claim of molestation of a minor. The two cases are distinct, and the evidence surrounding the Carroll case is significantly more robust and credible than that of the Johnson case.

Sources

  1. EVIDENCE, ADVOCACY, AND CARROLL V. TRUMP
  2. Fact Check: False posts say AP reported on Trump 'child molestation' charges
  3. Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards E. Jean Carroll $5 million
  4. E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump
  5. Jury Finds Trump Liable for Sexual Abuse and Defamation
  6. About the National Sexual Assault Telephone Hotline
  7. Yes, Donald Trump Was Accused of Raping a 13 Year Old, But ...
  8. The lawsuit accusing Trump of raping a 13-year-old girl, explained

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is there evidence that Trump won the 2020 election
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: is there evidence that Trump won the 2020 election

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is there evidence that Trump won the 2020 election

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 This whole saga with Epstein having any impact on Trump's approval rating overall when it comes to the Grand Old Party? Yeah I mean look I think this one surprised me a bit because of all these complaints online going after Trump and the Epstein Fasio might think his approval ratings were going down with Republicans if anything they're going up Republicans who approve of Trump look at our CNN poll the prior 186 percent the one out this week 88% were Republicans how about Quinipiac the prior poll 87% approval of Republicans week out, 90% with Republicans. If anything, 00:33 Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started. He is at the apex or close there too in terms of his popularity with Republican voters. Epstein files complaints or not. You just prove that not everything online is real. Yes. In real world. Who knew? Who knew? Amazing. Twitter and X are not reality.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 This whole saga with Epstein having any impact on Trump's approval rating overall when it comes to the Grand Old Party? Yeah I mean look I think this one surprised me a bit because of all these complaints online going after Trump and the Epstein Fasio might think his approval ratings were going down with Republicans if anything they're going up Republicans who approve of Trump look at our CNN poll the prior 186 percent the one out this week 88% were Republicans how about Quinipiac the prior poll 87% approval of Republicans week out, 90% with Republicans. If anything, 00:33 Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started. He is at the apex or close there too in terms of his popularity with Republican voters. Epstein files complaints or not. You just prove that not everything online is real. Yes. In real world. Who knew? Who knew? Amazing. Twitter and X are not reality.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 This whole saga with Epstein having any impact on Trump's approval rating overall when it comes to the Grand Old Party? Yeah I mean look I think this one surprised me a bit because of all these complaints online going after Trump and the Epstein Fasio might think his approval ratings were going down with Republicans if anything they're going up Republicans who approve of Trump look at our CNN poll the prior 186 percent the one out this week 88% were Republicans how about Quinipiac the prior poll 87% approval of Republicans week out, 90% with Republicans. If anything, 00:33 Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started. He is at the apex or close there too in terms of his popularity with Republican voters. Epstein files complaints or not. You just prove that not everything online is real. Yes. In real world. Who knew? Who knew? Amazing. Twitter and X are not reality.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump cares more about the United States image than the people who live there

Aug 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.
Partially True

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is there evidence of Donald Trump molesting a 13-year-old? | TruthOrFake Blog