Fact Check: Is Substack free?

Fact Check: Is Substack free?

Published June 30, 2025
VERDICT
Mostly True

# Is Substack Free? Substack, a platform for writers to publish newsletters and monetize their content, has garnered attention for its straightforwar...

Is Substack Free?

Substack, a platform for writers to publish newsletters and monetize their content, has garnered attention for its straightforward pricing model. The claim in question is whether Substack is free to use for both writers and readers. This article will explore the available information regarding Substack's pricing structure, the implications of its business model, and the nuances that come with the term "free."

What We Know

  1. Free to Publish: According to Substack's official support page, publishing on Substack is free for writers, regardless of the number of subscribers they have. Writers can create and distribute newsletters without any upfront costs [2].

  2. Transaction Fees: While publishing is free, Substack does charge a fee on paid subscriptions. Specifically, Substack takes a 10% cut from the subscription revenue generated by writers [5]. Additionally, there are credit card processing fees of 2.9% plus $0.30 per transaction, which writers must account for when pricing their subscriptions [2].

  3. Reader Access: Readers can subscribe to newsletters for free or choose to pay for premium content. Many writers offer a mix of free and paid content, allowing readers to access some articles without charge [5].

  4. Business Model: Substack's business model relies on a percentage of the revenue from paid subscriptions. This model incentivizes writers to grow their subscriber base, as their earnings are directly tied to the number of paying subscribers they attract [4].

  5. Funding and Growth: Substack has raised significant capital, totaling $82.4 million across several funding rounds, which may influence its operational strategies and pricing structure [1].

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  • Official Substack Support Page: This source is highly reliable as it comes directly from Substack, providing clear and accurate information about its pricing model. However, it is essential to recognize that this source may present a biased view, as it is intended to promote the platform [2].

  • SMB Guide Review: This review corroborates the information from Substack's support page, emphasizing that the platform is free for both writers and readers. However, as a review site, it may have a vested interest in promoting Substack as a viable option for writers [5].

  • Medium Article: This source discusses pricing strategies for Substack newsletters but does not provide definitive information about the platform's overall cost structure. It reflects the experiences of individual writers, which may vary widely and could introduce anecdotal bias [7].

  • Personal Blog Post: The blog post discussing thoughts on Substack's subscription model provides insights into the operational aspects of the platform but may reflect the author's personal opinions rather than objective facts [8].

Methodology and Evidence

The claim that Substack is free is supported by multiple sources, primarily from Substack itself and reviews that align with its messaging. However, the nuances of what "free" entails—specifically the fees associated with paid subscriptions—are critical to understanding the platform's financial implications for writers.

While the platform allows free publishing, the transaction fees and the 10% cut from subscription revenue mean that writers must consider these costs when determining their pricing strategies. This complexity may lead to misunderstandings about the overall cost of using Substack.

Additional Information Needed

To further clarify the claim, additional information would be helpful, such as:

  • Detailed case studies from a diverse range of writers using Substack, particularly those who have transitioned from free to paid models.
  • Comparative analysis of Substack's pricing structure against other newsletter platforms to understand its competitive positioning.
  • User testimonials regarding the financial impact of using Substack, including any hidden costs or unexpected fees.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The assertion that Substack is free to use is mostly accurate, as writers can publish newsletters without upfront costs, and readers can access a variety of content for free. However, the platform's business model includes transaction fees and a percentage cut from paid subscriptions, which complicates the notion of "free." This means that while the initial use of Substack may not incur direct costs, writers must navigate additional financial considerations when monetizing their content.

It is important to recognize that the term "free" in this context is nuanced. While the platform allows for free publishing and access to some content, the associated fees for paid subscriptions can impact writers' earnings and overall experience.

The evidence supporting this conclusion is derived from reliable sources, but it is essential to acknowledge that individual experiences may vary, and further data could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the platform's financial implications. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider their own needs and circumstances when assessing the use of Substack or similar platforms.

Sources

  1. Substack、Revue、Hedwig、知园这几款 Newsletter 发布工具优 ... (https://www.zhihu.com/question/463915587)
  2. How much does Substack cost? (https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/articles/360037607131-How-much-does-Substack-cost)
  3. Substack - 知乎 (https://www.zhihu.com/topic/25077209)
  4. Start a paid newsletter on Substack (https://substack.com/going-paid)
  5. Substack Review: Features, Pricing, & Alternatives [2025] (https://www.smbguide.com/review/substack/)
  6. Sliding Scale: Pay What You Can on My Substack (https://createmefree.substack.com/p/launching-pay-what-you-can-on-my)
  7. How to Price Your Substack Newsletter | by Captain Obvious (https://medium.com/fuck-niches/how-to-price-your-substack-newsletter-60c9ed6ddb05)
  8. Thoughts on Substack's Subscription Model (https://jamierubin.net/2022/01/27/thoughts-on-substacks-subscription-model/)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wordpress free?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is wordpress free?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wordpress free?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is vscode free?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is vscode free?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is vscode free?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is tzatziki gluten free?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Is tzatziki gluten free?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is tzatziki gluten free?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is snickers gluten free?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Is snickers gluten free?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is snickers gluten free?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is qrfy free?
Mostly True

Fact Check: Is qrfy free?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is qrfy free?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →