Fact Check: Is QGIS safe?

Fact Check: Is QGIS safe?

Published June 30, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Is QGIS Safe? ## Introduction The claim in question revolves around the safety of the Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), a popular open-...

Is QGIS Safe?

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around the safety of the Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), a popular open-source geographic information system (GIS) used for mapping and spatial analysis. Users are concerned about potential vulnerabilities and the overall security of the software, especially when handling sensitive data. This article will explore the available evidence regarding QGIS's safety, focusing on reported vulnerabilities, security measures, and user guidance.

What We Know

  1. Vulnerabilities: QGIS, like many software applications, can be susceptible to vulnerabilities. A recent vulnerability summary from CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) indicates that software vulnerabilities are categorized based on their severity, with high-risk vulnerabilities scoring between 7.0 and 10.0 on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) [2]. However, specific vulnerabilities related to QGIS have not been detailed in this source.

  2. Security Measures: The official QGIS website includes a dedicated section on security, stating that the QGIS project is aware of its deployment in sensitive environments and outlines how it responds to vulnerabilities [4]. This suggests that the QGIS team is proactive in addressing security concerns.

  3. User Guidance: According to a resource from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, users of QGIS must ensure that sensitive data is protected in compliance with VA regulations. This implies that while QGIS can be used safely, it is the user's responsibility to implement appropriate security measures [1].

  4. Specific Vulnerabilities: A discussion on a Google Group for Australian QGIS users highlighted a security issue related to Postgres, a database management system often used with QGIS. This vulnerability was identified as CVE-2025-1094, indicating that users need to be aware of the security of the underlying database systems they utilize alongside QGIS [8].

Analysis

The safety of QGIS can be assessed through various lenses, including the software's inherent vulnerabilities, the responsiveness of its development team, and user practices.

  • Source Reliability: The official QGIS website [4] is a primary source of information and is likely to be reliable as it comes directly from the developers. However, it is essential to consider that any software project may downplay vulnerabilities to maintain user trust. The CISA report [2] is also credible as it is a government agency focused on cybersecurity, but it does not specifically address QGIS vulnerabilities.

  • User Responsibility: The guidance provided by the VA [1] emphasizes the importance of user diligence in protecting sensitive data. This raises questions about how much of the software's safety relies on user practices versus the software's built-in security features.

  • Vulnerability Context: The mention of a specific vulnerability related to Postgres [8] indicates that while QGIS itself may be secure, the components it interacts with can introduce risks. This highlights the need for users to maintain awareness of all software in their tech stack.

  • Potential Bias: The sources from Zhihu [3], [5], and [7] are user-generated content and may reflect personal opinions rather than objective assessments. These sources should be treated with caution, as they may not provide a comprehensive view of QGIS's safety.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding the safety of QGIS is deemed "Partially True" based on the evidence reviewed. While the QGIS development team appears proactive in addressing vulnerabilities and providing security guidance, the software is not immune to risks, particularly those associated with external components like Postgres. The reliance on user practices for data protection further complicates the assessment of QGIS's overall safety.

It is important to note that while there are no specific high-risk vulnerabilities reported for QGIS itself, the lack of detailed vulnerability information means that users must remain vigilant. The evidence suggests that QGIS can be used safely, but this safety is contingent upon user diligence and awareness of the broader software environment.

Readers should be aware of the limitations in the available evidence, particularly the absence of comprehensive vulnerability disclosures specific to QGIS. As such, it is crucial for users to critically evaluate the information and implement appropriate security measures when using QGIS, especially in sensitive contexts.

Sources

  1. Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS) - U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Link
  2. Vulnerability Summary for the Week of May 26, 2025 - CISA. Link
  3. QGIS 和 ArcGIS 的区别和优缺点有哪些呢? - Zhihu. Link
  4. Security - QGIS Web Site. Link
  5. 有哪些相见恨晚的QGIS学习资源? - Zhihu. Link
  6. Security Project for QGIS. Link
  7. 有哪些 qgis 使用教程值得推荐? - Zhihu. Link
  8. Postgres security issue in QGIS - Google Groups. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is QGIS easy to learn?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is QGIS easy to learn?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is QGIS easy to learn?

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is zip extractor safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is xylitol safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wowroms safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →