Fact Check: Is Qelbree a controlled substance?

Fact Check: Is Qelbree a controlled substance?

Published June 30, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Is Qelbree a Controlled Substance? ## Introduction The claim in question is whether Qelbree, a medication used for treating Attention-Deficit/Hyper...

Is Qelbree a Controlled Substance?

Introduction

The claim in question is whether Qelbree, a medication used for treating Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), is classified as a controlled substance. This classification is significant because it affects how the drug is prescribed, dispensed, and monitored.

What We Know

  1. Qelbree Overview: Qelbree (viloxazine hydrochloride) is a non-stimulant medication approved by the FDA for the treatment of ADHD in pediatric patients aged 6 and older, as well as in adults. It acts primarily as a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has been noted for its potential to induce mania in patients with bipolar disorder [1].

  2. Controlled Substance Status: According to multiple sources, including the official Qelbree website and the FDA, Qelbree is not classified as a controlled substance. It is stated that there is no known misuse liability associated with this medication [4][6]. The FDA's official documentation also supports this assertion, indicating that Qelbree does not fall under the Controlled Substances Act [1].

  3. Evidence of Abuse: Clinical studies and reports suggest that Qelbree has not shown evidence of abuse or misuse, which is a critical factor in determining a drug's controlled status [2][4][6].

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim that Qelbree is not a controlled substance comes from several credible sources:

  • FDA Documentation: The FDA is a primary regulatory body for pharmaceuticals in the United States, and its documentation is considered highly reliable. The FDA's label for Qelbree explicitly states that it is not a controlled substance [1]. However, it is important to note that while the FDA provides authoritative information, it does not always encompass all potential adverse effects or long-term implications of a drug.

  • Manufacturer's Information: The official Qelbree website also asserts that the medication is not a controlled substance and emphasizes the lack of evidence for abuse [4][6]. While this information is relevant, it is essential to consider that the manufacturer may have a vested interest in presenting their product in a favorable light, which could introduce bias.

  • Wikipedia and General Medical Sources: The Wikipedia entry for viloxazine confirms that it is a non-stimulant medication with no known misuse liability [2]. While Wikipedia can be a useful starting point for information, it is important to verify claims through primary sources, as the content can be edited by anyone and may not always reflect the most current or accurate information.

Conflicts of Interest

The information provided by the manufacturer (Qelbree's website) may be subject to bias, as the company has a financial interest in promoting the drug. Therefore, while the data presented is likely accurate, it should be corroborated by independent sources.

Methodology and Evidence

The sources cited primarily rely on clinical studies and regulatory assessments that evaluate the drug's safety and efficacy. However, additional independent research, particularly long-term studies on the drug's potential for misuse in various populations, would be beneficial to fully understand its implications.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that Qelbree is a controlled substance is false. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes the FDA's official documentation, which categorically states that Qelbree is not classified as a controlled substance and lacks known misuse liability. Additionally, the information from the manufacturer and various medical sources corroborates this classification.

However, it is important to acknowledge that while the FDA's assessment is authoritative, it may not encompass all potential long-term effects or implications of the drug. Furthermore, the manufacturer's vested interest in promoting Qelbree could introduce bias in the information provided.

The current evidence does not indicate any misuse or abuse of Qelbree, but the absence of such evidence does not eliminate the need for ongoing research into the drug's long-term effects and potential for misuse in diverse populations.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider consulting multiple sources when assessing claims related to pharmaceuticals.

Sources

  1. FDA Label for Qelbree: FDA
  2. Viloxazine Wikipedia Entry: Wikipedia
  3. Qelbree Official Website - Pediatrics: Qelbree
  4. Qelbree Official Website - Adults: Qelbree
  5. Drugs.com Qelbree Overview: Drugs.com

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Controlled substance convictions always make individuals inadmissible to the United States.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Controlled substance convictions always make individuals inadmissible to the United States.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Controlled substance convictions always make individuals inadmissible to the United States.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is qsymia a controlled substance?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is qsymia a controlled substance?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is qsymia a controlled substance?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Xanax a controlled substance?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Xanax a controlled substance?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Xanax a controlled substance?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: is media and banking controlled by jews?
False

Fact Check: is media and banking controlled by jews?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is media and banking controlled by jews?

Aug 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: building 7 was a controlled demolition
False

Fact Check: building 7 was a controlled demolition

Detailed fact-check analysis of: building 7 was a controlled demolition

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →