Fact Check: Is Ozempic bad for you?

Fact Check: Is Ozempic bad for you?

Published June 29, 2025
by TruthOrFake
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Is Ozempic Bad for You? The claim regarding the safety of Ozempic (semaglutide) raises significant questions about its potential health risks and b...

Is Ozempic Bad for You?

The claim regarding the safety of Ozempic (semaglutide) raises significant questions about its potential health risks and benefits. As a medication primarily used for managing type 2 diabetes and aiding weight loss, Ozempic has garnered attention for both its effectiveness and its side effects. This article explores the available evidence surrounding the safety of Ozempic, examining various studies and expert opinions to provide a comprehensive overview without reaching a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

  1. Mechanism and Usage: Ozempic is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist that helps regulate blood sugar levels and promotes weight loss. It is typically prescribed for individuals with type 2 diabetes and has gained popularity for its off-label use in weight management.

  2. Common Side Effects: According to a systematic review, the most frequently reported side effects of semaglutide include mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal disturbances, such as nausea and vomiting, which are generally transient [1][2].

  3. Serious Health Risks: Some studies have indicated more severe risks associated with Ozempic. For instance, a review highlighted an increased risk of gallbladder-related disorders, including gallstones, affecting approximately 34% of users [3]. Additionally, other research has pointed to potential risks of kidney issues, pancreatitis, and gastrointestinal problems [4][6].

  4. Long-term Effects: A comprehensive analysis indicated that while Ozempic may reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications, there are concerns about its long-term safety profile, particularly regarding the development of conditions such as arthritis and other serious health issues [6][8].

  5. Expert Opinions: Health organizations and experts generally acknowledge the effectiveness of Ozempic but caution about its side effects. The Harvard Health Blog notes that while GLP-1 drugs are effective, they are not without risks, including cosmetic changes like "Ozempic face," which refers to facial changes due to weight loss [5].

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the safety of Ozempic presents a mixed picture.

  • Reliability of Sources: The clinical review report from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1] is a reputable source, as it compiles data from multiple studies. However, the findings are based on a limited number of trials, which may not fully capture the broader population's experiences. Similarly, the PubMed article [2] is peer-reviewed and widely cited, lending credibility to its conclusions about mild-to-moderate side effects.

  • Potential Bias: Some sources, such as the article from Harvard Health [5], may have a slight bias towards highlighting the positive aspects of Ozempic due to its affiliation with a prestigious health institution. However, it also acknowledges the side effects, which adds a layer of balance. The article from Nature [6], while informative, may also be influenced by the ongoing debates in the medical community about the safety of weight-loss drugs, potentially leading to sensationalized claims.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many studies cited rely on self-reported data from patients, which can introduce bias and inaccuracies. For example, anecdotal reports from forums like the Diabetes UK Forum [7] may not provide a representative sample of the population using Ozempic, as they often reflect individual experiences rather than systematic data.

  • Need for Further Research: While the existing studies provide valuable insights, additional long-term studies are necessary to fully understand the implications of prolonged Ozempic use. Research focusing on diverse populations and larger sample sizes would help clarify the risks and benefits associated with this medication.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that Ozempic may pose health risks is partially true, as the evidence indicates both potential benefits and significant side effects. While Ozempic is effective for managing type 2 diabetes and aiding weight loss, it is associated with common side effects like gastrointestinal disturbances and more serious risks such as gallbladder disorders and potential kidney issues.

However, the evidence is not definitive, as many studies are limited in scope and may not fully represent the broader population's experiences. Additionally, the reliance on self-reported data introduces potential biases, and there is a need for further research to better understand the long-term safety profile of Ozempic.

Readers should approach this information critically and consider consulting healthcare professionals for personalized advice regarding Ozempic or any other medication. It is essential to weigh the benefits against the risks and to stay informed about ongoing research in this area.

Sources

  1. Results - Clinical Review Report: Semaglutide (Ozempic) NIH
  2. Safety of Semaglutide PubMed
  3. Considering taking a weight-loss drug like Ozempic? Here are ... University of Queensland
  4. Study identifies benefits, risks linked to popular weight-loss ... Washington University
  5. GLP-1 diabetes and weight-loss drug side effects Harvard Health
  6. Obesity drugs: huge study identifies new health risks Nature
  7. Ozempic | Diabetes UK Forum Diabetes UK
  8. The Long-term Safety of Ozempic: What You Need to Know Lindus Health

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is OGX shampoo bad for your hair?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is OGX shampoo bad for your hair?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is OGX shampoo bad for your hair?

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: EU leaders now fear a bad trade deal with Trump.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: EU leaders now fear a bad trade deal with Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: EU leaders now fear a bad trade deal with Trump.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ai is bad
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: ai is bad

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ai is bad

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's legal rationales for military action are rooted in 'staggering bad faith.'
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump's legal rationales for military action are rooted in 'staggering bad faith.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's legal rationales for military action are rooted in 'staggering bad faith.'

Jun 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Grok 3 refuses to generate fictional violence, drug content, etc, in roleplays because its policies are left-leaning and puritan, and could very easily implement a nsfw filter toggle, but refuses to, similar to Chat GPT/Character AI, thus lobotomizing the  AI models and making them worse in a bad attempt to keep them "family friendly/appropriate for all ages" when in actually it is being advertised primarily to children.
Partially True

Fact Check: Grok 3 refuses to generate fictional violence, drug content, etc, in roleplays because its policies are left-leaning and puritan, and could very easily implement a nsfw filter toggle, but refuses to, similar to Chat GPT/Character AI, thus lobotomizing the AI models and making them worse in a bad attempt to keep them "family friendly/appropriate for all ages" when in actually it is being advertised primarily to children.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Grok 3 refuses to generate fictional violence, drug content, etc, in roleplays because its policies are left-leaning and puritan, and could very easily implement a nsfw filter toggle, but refuses to, similar to Chat GPT/Character AI, thus lobotomizing the AI models and making them worse in a bad attempt to keep them "family friendly/appropriate for all ages" when in actually it is being advertised primarily to children.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are ozempic and wegovy the same?
Partially True

Fact Check: Are ozempic and wegovy the same?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are ozempic and wegovy the same?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Ozempic bad for you? | TruthOrFake Blog