TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is "Only" a song?

Fact Check: Is "Only" a song?

Published May 9, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Is "Only" a Song? The claim under examination is a simple yet intriguing question: "Is 'Only' a song?" This inquiry could refer to multiple songs t...

Is "Only" a Song?

The claim under examination is a simple yet intriguing question: "Is 'Only' a song?" This inquiry could refer to multiple songs titled "Only" by different artists, as well as songs with similar titles. This article will explore the various songs that include "Only" in their titles, their significance, and the context surrounding them, while critically evaluating the sources of information available.

What We Know

  1. Nicki Minaj's "Only": Released in 2014, "Only" is a hip-hop song featuring artists Drake, Lil Wayne, and Chris Brown. The song was produced by Dr. Luke and others and is characterized by its "icy" production and metaphorical lyrics 1.

  2. Nine Inch Nails' "Only": This song is from the band's 2005 album With Teeth. It achieved notable success, reaching number one on the Billboard Modern Rock chart for seven weeks 3.

  3. Other Songs with "Only": There are several other songs with "Only" in their titles, including "Only One" by Kanye West featuring Paul McCartney 5, and "Only a Song" by Van Morrison 10. Additionally, "Only a Northern Song" is a track by The Beatles, which has been covered by various artists 2.

  4. Historical Context: The term "only" has been used in various song titles across genres and decades, indicating its broad appeal and versatility in songwriting.

Analysis

The claim "Is 'Only' a song?" can be interpreted in multiple ways, as it could refer to any song with "Only" in the title or the concept of a song being defined by its title.

Source Evaluation

  • Wikipedia Articles: The Wikipedia entries for the songs provide a foundational understanding of each track, including their release dates, artists, and critical reception. However, Wikipedia is a user-edited platform, which means that while it can be a good starting point, the information may not always be fully reliable or up-to-date. Cross-referencing with primary sources or official artist statements would enhance credibility.

  • Washington Post Article: While not directly related to the claim, the article discussing why catchy songs get stuck in our heads 7 provides insight into the psychological aspects of music, which could be relevant when considering the impact of songs with common titles like "Only." However, it does not specifically address the claim.

  • YouTube and Lyrics Sites: The official music video for Van Morrison's "Only a Song" 8 and the lyrics provided on Genius 10 offer direct access to the content of the songs. These sources are useful for understanding the artistic intent and reception but should be viewed with caution regarding potential biases, as they may promote the artist's work.

Conflicting Information

While there is a consensus that "Only" is indeed a title used by multiple songs, the interpretation of the claim could vary. For instance, if someone is asking whether "Only" refers to a singular, definitive song, the answer would be more complex. Each song titled "Only" serves different artistic purposes and belongs to different genres, which complicates the claim.

Methodological Considerations

To fully assess the claim, it would be beneficial to gather more information on:

  • The number of songs with "Only" in their titles across various genres.
  • The cultural significance of these songs and how they are perceived by audiences.
  • Any statistical data on the popularity or chart performance of these songs.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The claim that "Only" is a song is substantiated by the existence of multiple songs with "Only" in their titles, including notable tracks by artists such as Nicki Minaj and Nine Inch Nails. The evidence indicates that "Only" is not just a singular song but a common title used across various genres and decades, reflecting its broad appeal in music.

However, it is important to note that the interpretation of the claim can vary. If the question implies whether "Only" refers to a specific, singular song, the answer becomes more nuanced, as there are numerous songs with that title, each serving different artistic purposes.

Moreover, while the sources consulted provide a solid foundation for understanding the songs titled "Only," they also have limitations, particularly regarding the reliability of user-edited platforms like Wikipedia and potential biases in promotional content from artists.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information themselves and consider the context and nuances surrounding claims related to music and song titles.

Sources

  1. Only (Nicki Minaj song) - Wikipedia. Link
  2. Only a Northern Song - Wikipedia. Link
  3. Only (Nine Inch Nails song) - Wikipedia. Link
  4. It's Only a Paper Moon - Wikipedia. Link
  5. Only One (Kanye West song) - Wikipedia. Link
  6. God Only Knows - Wikipedia. Link
  7. Why catchy songs get stuck in your head (and how to stop it) - Washington Post. Link
  8. Van Morrison - Only A Song (Official Video) - YouTube. Link
  9. Song Finder (By Lyrics) - Quick, Easy, Fun - Zing Instruments. Link
  10. Van Morrison - Only a Song Lyrics - Genius. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: When Hitler invaded Poland, so did Russia. But “Allies” only declared war on Germany
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: When Hitler invaded Poland, so did Russia. But “Allies” only declared war on Germany

Detailed fact-check analysis of: When Hitler invaded Poland, so did Russia. But “Allies” only declared war on Germany

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is YMCA a gay song?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is YMCA a gay song?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is YMCA a gay song?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is "On the Way" a song?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is "On the Way" a song?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is "On the Way" a song?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is "On Fire" a song?
True

Fact Check: Is "On Fire" a song?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is "On Fire" a song?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is "Erika" a Nazi song?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is "Erika" a Nazi song?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is "Erika" a Nazi song?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is "Only" a song? | TruthOrFake Blog