TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is NJ still in a drought?

Fact Check: Is NJ still in a drought?

Published June 29, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
Mostly False

# Is NJ Still in a Drought? The claim in question is whether New Jersey is currently experiencing a drought. This inquiry arises from recent reports ...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Is NJ Still in a Drought?

The claim in question is whether New Jersey is currently experiencing a drought. This inquiry arises from recent reports and announcements regarding drought conditions in the state, particularly following a prolonged dry spell that has affected various regions.

What We Know

  1. Drought Conditions: According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, New Jersey has faced drought conditions in recent years, notably from 2024 to 2025. The state has experienced significant dry periods, leading to crop production losses and increased water usage concerns [1].

  2. Official Announcements: On June 11, 2025, the Murphy Administration announced the lifting of drought warnings for most of New Jersey. However, the Coastal South region was moved to a "drought watch" status, indicating that while the overall drought warning has ended, some areas still require monitoring due to ongoing dry conditions [2][4].

  3. Recent Weather Patterns: Reports indicate that New Jersey has seen an increase in rainfall recently, which has contributed to the lifting of drought warnings. However, the dry fall preceding this rainfall was significant enough to extend drought conditions into 2025 [3][8].

  4. Regional Variability: The drought status varies by region within New Jersey. While most areas have returned to normal conditions, the Coastal South region remains under observation, suggesting that localized drought conditions may still exist [2][4].

Analysis

The sources consulted provide a mixed picture of New Jersey's current drought status. The U.S. Drought Monitor is a reliable source, as it is based on data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other meteorological organizations. However, it is important to note that drought conditions can vary significantly within a state, and localized reports may not reflect statewide trends.

The Murphy Administration's announcement is a primary source of information regarding official drought status changes. Government announcements can be credible, but they may also be influenced by political considerations or public relations efforts. Therefore, while the lifting of the drought warning is an important development, the continued drought watch in the Coastal South region suggests that the situation is not uniformly resolved.

The report from Rutgers University provides context about the weather patterns leading to these drought conditions. It highlights the complexity of drought management, as weather patterns can shift rapidly, and the effects of drought can linger even after conditions improve. This source is credible, as it comes from a well-respected academic institution, but it is also important to consider that academic institutions may have their own agendas or perspectives on environmental issues.

The article from NJ.com provides timely updates on the drought situation, but as a news outlet, it may prioritize sensational aspects of the story to attract readership. This potential bias should be considered when evaluating its reliability.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that New Jersey is currently experiencing a drought is "Mostly False." While the state has lifted drought warnings for most regions, the Coastal South remains under a "drought watch," indicating that localized drought conditions still exist. This nuanced situation reflects the variability in drought conditions across different areas of the state.

The evidence from the U.S. Drought Monitor and official announcements from the Murphy Administration supports this verdict, as it highlights both the improvements in overall conditions and the ongoing concerns in specific regions. However, it is essential to recognize the limitations of the available evidence. The situation can change rapidly due to weather patterns, and localized reports may not capture the broader context.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding drought conditions and consider the complexities involved in such assessments. The status of drought can vary significantly within a state, and ongoing monitoring is necessary to understand the full picture.

Sources

  1. U.S. Drought Monitor - New Jersey. Retrieved from https://www.drought.gov/states/new-jersey
  2. Murphy Administration Lifts Drought Warning For All Of New Jersey. Retrieved from https://dep.nj.gov/newsrel/25_0031/
  3. What's the Deal with the Drought? Retrieved from https://salem.njaes.rutgers.edu/2025/06/19/whats-the-deal-with-the-drought/
  4. Drought Information | News and Announcements - NJDEP. Retrieved from https://dep.nj.gov/drought/news-and-announcements/
  5. Long drought warning in N.J. finally ends, but 8 counties placed under drought watch. Retrieved from https://www.nj.com/weather/2025/06/long-drought-warning-in-nj-finally-ends-but-8-counties-placed-under-drought-watch.html
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is kgb still active?
Mostly False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is kgb still active?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is kgb still active?

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: House Republicans just shut down half the legislative branch because they’re afraid of the Epstein files. The Senate still has no clue about a Trump judicial nominee’s involvement in the cover up. Emil Bove was in senior leadership at DOJ when the files were reviewed.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: France still has colonies
True

Fact Check: France still has colonies

Detailed fact-check analysis of: France still has colonies

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is handing out cash cards like Halloween candy to illegal immigrants — while 16,000+ wildfire victims who lost their homes and businesses are STILL waiting for help. 🔥 Only 12 rebuilding permits have been issued. TWELVE. 🔥 Entire communities reduced to ashes. 🔥 Taxpaying Americans left in a bureaucratic chokehold.
Partially True

Fact Check: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is handing out cash cards like Halloween candy to illegal immigrants — while 16,000+ wildfire victims who lost their homes and businesses are STILL waiting for help. 🔥 Only 12 rebuilding permits have been issued. TWELVE. 🔥 Entire communities reduced to ashes. 🔥 Taxpaying Americans left in a bureaucratic chokehold.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass is handing out cash cards like Halloween candy to illegal immigrants — while 16,000+ wildfire victims who lost their homes and businesses are STILL waiting for help. 🔥 Only 12 rebuilding permits have been issued. TWELVE. 🔥 Entire communities reduced to ashes. 🔥 Taxpaying Americans left in a bureaucratic chokehold.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is NJ still in a drought? | TruthOrFake Blog