TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is MLB The Show 25 on PC?

Fact Check: Is MLB The Show 25 on PC?

Published June 12, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Is MLB The Show 25 on PC? The claim in question is whether "MLB The Show 25" will be available on PC. This inquiry arises from the game's history o...

Is MLB The Show 25 on PC?

The claim in question is whether "MLB The Show 25" will be available on PC. This inquiry arises from the game's history of exclusivity and its recent expansions to other platforms. The anticipation surrounding the game has led to confusion among potential players regarding its availability on PC.

What We Know

  1. Release Date and Platforms: "MLB The Show 25" is set to launch on March 18, 2025, with pre-orders starting on February 4, 2025. The game will be available on various gaming consoles, including PlayStation and Xbox, but there is no official confirmation regarding a PC release [2][5].

  2. Historical Context: Historically, the MLB The Show franchise was exclusive to PlayStation consoles until 2021, when it was made available on Xbox platforms as well. This marked a significant shift in the game's distribution strategy [1][4].

  3. Current Status: According to multiple sources, including a recent report from New Baseball Media, "MLB The Show 25" will not be available on PC. This aligns with Sony's previous decisions regarding the franchise, as they have not released any of the MLB The Show games on PC to date [4][6].

  4. Official Sources: The official MLB The Show website and PlayStation support pages provide information about the game but do not mention any plans for a PC version [3][5].

Analysis

The claim regarding the availability of "MLB The Show 25" on PC has been addressed by several sources, each providing varying degrees of reliability and bias.

  • Operation Sports is a reputable site focused on sports gaming, known for its community-driven content. However, it does not provide definitive answers regarding the PC version, instead suggesting that confusion exists among players [1]. This source is credible but lacks a clear stance on the claim.

  • Sportskeeda discusses how to play the game on PC but does not confirm its availability, which may mislead readers into thinking that there are ways to access it on that platform [2]. The site has a mixed reputation, often publishing content that ranges from informative to speculative.

  • New Baseball Media provides a straightforward answer, stating that "MLB The Show 25" will not be available on PC, citing Sony's historical approach to the franchise [4]. This source appears to be reliable, as it directly addresses the claim without ambiguity.

  • Destructoid also confirms the unavailability of the game on PC, but it is essential to consider that this site may have a bias towards console gaming, which could influence its reporting [6].

  • The official MLB The Show website and PlayStation support pages are the most authoritative sources, as they come directly from the game's publisher. However, they do not explicitly mention the absence of a PC version, which leaves some ambiguity [3][5].

Overall, while there is a consensus among several sources that "MLB The Show 25" will not be available on PC, the lack of an official announcement from Sony leaves some room for speculation. The sources vary in reliability, with official channels being the most trustworthy.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "MLB The Show 25" will be available on PC is false. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes multiple reliable sources, such as New Baseball Media and Destructoid, which confirm that the game will not be released on PC. Additionally, the official MLB The Show website and PlayStation support pages do not indicate any plans for a PC version, aligning with Sony's historical trend of keeping the franchise exclusive to console platforms.

It is important to note that while the consensus among sources strongly suggests that the game will not be available on PC, the absence of an explicit statement from Sony leaves a slight possibility for future announcements. This uncertainty highlights the need for ongoing monitoring of official communications from the publisher.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and remain aware of the evolving nature of gaming announcements, as details may change closer to the release date.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is MLB The Show 25 on PS4?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is MLB The Show 25 on PS4?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is MLB The Show 25 on PS4?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is MLB The Show 25 on Game Pass?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is MLB The Show 25 on Game Pass?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is MLB The Show 25 on Game Pass?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are MLB The Show servers down?
Mostly True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are MLB The Show servers down?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are MLB The Show servers down?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Just Like Mom" was a Canadian game show hosted by a pedophile who kept trying to kiss little girls, sometimes even without their permission.
False

Fact Check: "Just Like Mom" was a Canadian game show hosted by a pedophile who kept trying to kiss little girls, sometimes even without their permission.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Just Like Mom" was a Canadian game show hosted by a pedophile who kept trying to kiss little girls, sometimes even without their permission.

Aug 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is MLB on ESPN?
False

Fact Check: Is MLB on ESPN?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is MLB on ESPN?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks