TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is MJ the Musical good?

Fact Check: Is MJ the Musical good?

Published June 12, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Is MJ the Musical Good? A Detailed Examination ## Introduction The claim in question revolves around the quality and reception of "MJ: The Musical,...

Is MJ the Musical Good? A Detailed Examination

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around the quality and reception of "MJ: The Musical," a theatrical production centered on the life and career of the iconic pop star Michael Jackson. With various reviews and audience reactions circulating, the question arises: is "MJ: The Musical" genuinely a good show? This article aims to explore the available evidence and perspectives regarding the musical without reaching a final verdict.

What We Know

"MJ: The Musical" debuted on Broadway and has garnered significant attention, winning four Tony Awards, including Best Choreography. The musical is framed around the preparations for Jackson's 1992 "Dangerous" World Tour and is presented through a fictional documentary interview format, which adds a unique narrative structure to the performance [3][7].

Critics have noted the impressive choreography and the overall production quality. For instance, a review from the Arizona Daily Wildcat describes the musical as "bewitching," highlighting the emotional impact of the story and the choreography [1]. Similarly, a review from Third Coast Review emphasizes the anticipation and excitement surrounding the national tour, distinguishing it from other jukebox musicals due to Jackson's extensive catalog of music [2].

Audience reactions have also been largely positive. Reviews on platforms like TripAdvisor reflect a warm reception, with attendees praising the musical as "thoroughly entertaining" and "thought-provoking" [4]. Customer reviews on sites like New York City Theatre echo similar sentiments, with many expressing their enjoyment and surprise at the quality of the show [6].

Analysis

While the reviews and audience feedback appear overwhelmingly positive, it is essential to critically evaluate the sources and the context of these claims.

  1. Source Reliability: The reviews cited come from a mix of established media outlets, such as Chicago Sun-Times and Broadway World, as well as audience-generated content on platforms like TripAdvisor. Established media outlets typically have editorial standards and fact-checking processes, which can lend credibility to their reviews. However, audience reviews may be more subjective and influenced by personal biases.

  2. Potential Bias: Some sources may have inherent biases. For example, the official blog of "MJ: The Musical" presents a compilation of reviews that may selectively highlight only the most favorable opinions [4]. This could create a skewed perception of the musical's overall quality. Additionally, the musical's promotional materials may also emphasize positive reviews to attract more audiences.

  3. Methodology: The reviews do not always provide a detailed analysis of the musical's elements, such as the storyline, character development, or thematic depth. While many reviews praise the choreography and music, they may not adequately address potential shortcomings in narrative coherence or character arcs. A more comprehensive analysis would benefit from a deeper exploration of these aspects.

  4. Contradicting Perspectives: While the majority of reviews are positive, it would be beneficial to seek out dissenting opinions or critiques that highlight any weaknesses in the production. This could include reviews that focus on areas such as pacing, character development, or the handling of sensitive topics related to Jackson's life.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence presented indicates that "MJ: The Musical" is generally well-received, with numerous positive reviews from both critics and audiences. Key evidence supporting this verdict includes the musical's four Tony Awards, particularly for Best Choreography, and the enthusiastic audience feedback highlighting its entertainment value and emotional impact.

However, it is important to note that while the overall reception is favorable, there are limitations in the available evidence. Many reviews focus primarily on the choreography and music, with less emphasis on narrative depth and character development. Additionally, the potential for bias in both critical and audience reviews suggests that some perspectives may be overly positive.

Readers are encouraged to consider this context and the nuances of the reviews when forming their own opinions about the musical. Critical evaluation of information is essential, as individual experiences and preferences can significantly influence perceptions of theatrical productions.

Sources

  1. Arizona Daily Wildcat. "REVIEW: 'MJ: The Musical' is a bewitching watch." Link
  2. Third Coast Review. "Captivating MJ: The Musical National Tour Gives Audiences an ..." Link
  3. Show-Score. "MJ The Musical (Broadway) NYC Reviews and Tickets." Link
  4. MJ The Musical Official Blog. "Critics' Corner: What the Reviews Say About Broadway and - MJ the Musical." Link
  5. Chicago Sun-Times. "'MJ' a thriller of a tribute to Michael Jackson's music." Link
  6. New York City Theatre. "Customer Reviews for MJ The Musical." Link
  7. Broadway World. "Review: MJ: THE MUSICAL at Fox Cities Performing Arts Center." Link
  8. Broadway World. "MJ the Musical Broadway Reviews." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is MJ the Musical coming to Melbourne?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is MJ the Musical coming to Melbourne?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is MJ the Musical coming to Melbourne?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Emilia Perez a musical?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Emilia Perez a musical?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Emilia Perez a musical?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wqhd good?
True

Fact Check: Is wqhd good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wqhd good?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is vvs2 clarity good?
True

Fact Check: Is vvs2 clarity good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is vvs2 clarity good?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is vvs1 clarity good?
True

Fact Check: Is vvs1 clarity good?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is vvs1 clarity good?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks