Fact Check: Is LKM road tax?

Fact Check: Is LKM road tax?

June 12, 2025by TruthOrFake
VERDICT
True

# Is LKM Road Tax? The claim in question revolves around the term "LKM" and whether it refers to road tax in Malaysia. LKM, or "Lesen Kenderaan Motor...

Is LKM Road Tax?

The claim in question revolves around the term "LKM" and whether it refers to road tax in Malaysia. LKM, or "Lesen Kenderaan Motor," translates to Motor Vehicle License in English and is often associated with vehicle registration and road tax in the context of Malaysian transportation regulations. This article will explore the details surrounding LKM and its relationship to road tax, drawing from various sources to provide a comprehensive overview.

What We Know

  1. Definition of LKM: The LKM is a license required for motor vehicles in Malaysia, which includes the payment of road tax. According to the Malaysian Ministry of Transport, road tax is a fee that must be paid for the use of motor vehicles on public roads, and it is calculated based on various factors including vehicle type and engine capacity [1].

  2. Road Tax Regulations: The Malaysian Road Transport Department (JPJ) outlines that the LKM is integral to vehicle registration and that road tax must be paid annually. The rates and calculations for road tax can vary significantly depending on the vehicle's specifications [1][2].

  3. Exemption Procedures: There are specific procedures for applying for exemptions from the LKM fees, indicating that while LKM is generally a requirement, there are circumstances under which it can be waived [2].

  4. Refund Procedures: The JPJ has established processes for the cancellation and refund of the LKM, which further emphasizes its role as a mandatory fee associated with vehicle ownership [3].

  5. Digital Transition: In recent developments, the JPJ has announced a shift towards digital road tax options, although physical LKM documents will still be available for those who prefer them [7][8].

Analysis

The evidence presented indicates that LKM is indeed related to road tax in Malaysia, functioning as a motor vehicle license that incorporates the payment of road tax. However, the sources must be critically evaluated for their reliability and potential biases.

  • Government Sources: The Ministry of Transport and JPJ are primary sources of information regarding vehicle licensing and road tax in Malaysia. These sources are generally reliable as they provide official guidelines and regulations. However, they may have a vested interest in promoting compliance with vehicle registration laws, which could influence the presentation of information.

  • Wikipedia: The Wikipedia entry on road tax provides a general overview of the concept of road tax globally but lacks specific details about the Malaysian context. While it can serve as a starting point for understanding road tax, it should not be solely relied upon for authoritative information [6].

  • News Articles: The articles from iMotorbike and Paultan provide insights into recent changes in the road tax system in Malaysia, including the transition to digital formats. These sources are useful for understanding current trends but may reflect the authors' interpretations or biases regarding the effectiveness of these changes [7][8].

  • Legal Definitions: The definitions provided in the Virginia and D.C. codes are not relevant to the Malaysian context and do not contribute to understanding the claim about LKM [4][5].

Overall, while the sources confirm that LKM is associated with road tax in Malaysia, the nuances of its application and the implications of recent changes in the system warrant further investigation.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence supports the claim that LKM, or "Lesen Kenderaan Motor," is indeed related to road tax in Malaysia. Key evidence includes the definition of LKM as a motor vehicle license that requires the payment of road tax, as outlined by the Malaysian Ministry of Transport and the Road Transport Department (JPJ). Additionally, the regulations regarding exemptions and refunds further reinforce the connection between LKM and road tax.

However, it is important to note that while the relationship is clear, the specific details regarding rates, exemptions, and the transition to digital formats may vary and evolve over time. Thus, while the claim is substantiated, the context surrounding LKM and road tax is subject to change and may require ongoing scrutiny.

Readers should also be aware of the limitations in the available evidence, particularly regarding potential biases in government sources and the general nature of information from secondary sources like news articles and Wikipedia. As such, it is advisable for readers to critically evaluate information themselves and seek out multiple sources when researching topics related to vehicle licensing and taxation.

Sources

  1. Road Taxes - Ministry of Transport. Available at: https://www.mot.gov.my/en/land/operators/road-taxes
  2. LKM Exemption Application Procedures - Vehicle. Available at: https://www.jpj.gov.my/en/web/main-site/kenderaan1-en/-/knowledge_base/vehicle/lkm-exemption-application-procedures
  3. Procedure for Cancellation and Refund of Motor Vehicle License Fee (LKM). Available at: https://www.jpj.gov.my/en/procedure-for-cancellation-and-refund-of-motor-vehicle-license-fee-lkm/
  4. Chapter 27. Road Tax on Motor Carriers. Available at: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacodefull/title58.1/chapter27/
  5. 50–401. Definitions. Available at: https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/50-401
  6. Road tax. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_tax
  7. Digital and Paper Road Tax Options: What You Need to Know. Available at: https://news.imotorbike.com/en/2024/02/road-tax-malaysia-renew-lkm/
  8. New road tax for cars and bikes in Malaysia - not required to be ... Available at: https://paultan.org/2024/02/09/jpj-physical-road-tax-renewal-faq/

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is GST tax?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is GST tax?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is GST tax?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is FSA pre tax?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is FSA pre tax?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is FSA pre tax?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Apr 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is "impuesto directo" a type of tax?
True

Fact Check: Is "impuesto directo" a type of tax?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is "impuesto directo" a type of tax?

May 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are hsa contributions pre tax?
True

Fact Check: Are hsa contributions pre tax?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are hsa contributions pre tax?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are fsa contributions pre tax?
True

Fact Check: Are fsa contributions pre tax?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are fsa contributions pre tax?

May 8, 2025
Read more →