TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is LCWRA going up in 2025?

Fact Check: Is LCWRA going up in 2025?

Published June 12, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Is LCWRA Going Up in 2025? The claim in question pertains to whether the rate of the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) component...

Is LCWRA Going Up in 2025?

The claim in question pertains to whether the rate of the Limited Capability for Work-Related Activity (LCWRA) component of Universal Credit (UC) will increase in 2025. This component is crucial for individuals who are unable to work due to health conditions or disabilities, as it provides additional financial support. Various sources have reported on potential changes to these benefits, but the specifics remain somewhat unclear.

What We Know

  1. Current Rates and Future Projections: According to the UK government's official publication on benefit and pension rates for 2025 to 2026, the LCWRA component is set to be £97 per week starting in April 2025, which will remain at that level until 2029/2030 [2]. This suggests that there will be no increase in the rate for that period, contradicting the notion of a "going up" scenario.

  2. Changes in Eligibility and Structure: The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has announced significant changes to the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) process, which will affect how individuals are assessed for LCWRA eligibility starting in 2025 [6]. This includes proposals to restrict eligibility for LCWRA and related categories, which may impact the number of claimants receiving this support.

  3. Funding Allocations: The government has indicated that there will be an additional £3.7 billion allocated for social care authorities in 2025/2026, which may indirectly affect the landscape of disability benefits and support services [3]. However, this funding does not specifically address the LCWRA rate itself.

  4. Potential Confusion in Reporting: Some sources have reported conflicting information regarding the future of the LCWRA rate. For instance, a recent article suggests that the LCWRA payment will be reduced for new claimants starting in April 2026 [7]. This raises questions about the accuracy of claims regarding increases in 2025.

Analysis

The reliability of the sources varies significantly:

  • Government Publications: Sources such as the official UK government websites [1][2][3] are generally considered credible due to their authoritative nature. However, they may also reflect governmental agendas, particularly in how they present changes to benefits.

  • Advocacy Groups: Articles from organizations like Disability Rights UK [6] provide valuable insights into the implications of policy changes but may carry a bias towards advocating for claimants' rights. Their interpretation of the changes could be influenced by their mission to support individuals with disabilities.

  • Media Reports: Some media outlets have reported on potential changes to LCWRA payments, but the accuracy of these reports can vary. For example, the Birmingham Mail article [8] discusses specific dates and changes but does not provide detailed sourcing for its claims, which raises questions about its reliability.

Methodological Concerns

The methodology behind the predictions and claims regarding LCWRA rates is not always transparent. For instance, while government documents provide official rates, they do not always clarify the rationale behind proposed changes or the criteria for eligibility adjustments. Additionally, the lack of detailed breakdowns in some reports makes it difficult to assess the validity of claims regarding future increases or decreases.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that the LCWRA component of Universal Credit will increase in 2025 is false. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes the UK government's official publication indicating that the LCWRA rate will remain at £97 per week from April 2025 until 2029/2030, with no projected increase during this period. Furthermore, proposed changes to the Work Capability Assessment may restrict eligibility, potentially reducing the number of claimants rather than increasing financial support.

It is important to note that while there are significant changes proposed in the assessment process, these do not translate into an increase in the LCWRA rate itself. Additionally, some reports have introduced confusion regarding future changes, but the official government sources provide a clearer picture of the current situation.

However, limitations exist in the available evidence, particularly regarding the interpretation of policy changes and their implications for future claimants. The landscape of disability benefits can be complex and subject to political shifts, which may not be fully captured in current reports.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the nuances of policy changes, especially in the context of benefits that affect vulnerable populations.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Don't ever forget every news media outlet was telling you if you was unvaccinated in 2021 to go ahead pick your barrier plot get you a good ass casket and set your suit up. Cuz you going todie. Not going to you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. His drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its vaccine trial for adolescents. It says its coronavirus shot was 1 00 percent effective at preventing infection and sickness among 12 to 15 year 00:30 olds. That's what the fucking message was in twenty twenty-1. Never forget that shit. Now in 2025 they say COVID vaccine heart risk warning. Update issues by FDA. I guess it's time to stop listening to these stupid motherfuckers. They obviously don't know what the fuck they talking about.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Don't ever forget every news media outlet was telling you if you was unvaccinated in 2021 to go ahead pick your barrier plot get you a good ass casket and set your suit up. Cuz you going todie. Not going to you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. His drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its vaccine trial for adolescents. It says its coronavirus shot was 1 00 percent effective at preventing infection and sickness among 12 to 15 year 00:30 olds. That's what the fucking message was in twenty twenty-1. Never forget that shit. Now in 2025 they say COVID vaccine heart risk warning. Update issues by FDA. I guess it's time to stop listening to these stupid motherfuckers. They obviously don't know what the fuck they talking about.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Don't ever forget every news media outlet was telling you if you was unvaccinated in 2021 to go ahead pick your barrier plot get you a good ass casket and set your suit up. Cuz you going todie. Not going to you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. His drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its vaccine trial for adolescents. It says its coronavirus shot was 1 00 percent effective at preventing infection and sickness among 12 to 15 year 00:30 olds. That's what the fucking message was in twenty twenty-1. Never forget that shit. Now in 2025 they say COVID vaccine heart risk warning. Update issues by FDA. I guess it's time to stop listening to these stupid motherfuckers. They obviously don't know what the fuck they talking about.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: National guard in D.C. going after children
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: National guard in D.C. going after children

Detailed fact-check analysis of: National guard in D.C. going after children

Aug 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRM THAT ICE IS NOW GOING FROM PARK TO PARK IN LOS ANGELES, ARRESTING CAREGIVERS... SOME WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS, AND SEPARATING THEM FROM THE AMERICAN CHILDREN THEY'RE CARING FOR. KIDS ARE BEING THROWN INTO THE BACK OF VAN UNTIL THEIR PARENTS ARE LOCATED.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRM THAT ICE IS NOW GOING FROM PARK TO PARK IN LOS ANGELES, ARRESTING CAREGIVERS... SOME WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS, AND SEPARATING THEM FROM THE AMERICAN CHILDREN THEY'RE CARING FOR. KIDS ARE BEING THROWN INTO THE BACK OF VAN UNTIL THEIR PARENTS ARE LOCATED.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: MULTIPLE SOURCES CONFIRM THAT ICE IS NOW GOING FROM PARK TO PARK IN LOS ANGELES, ARRESTING CAREGIVERS... SOME WHO ARE LEGAL RESIDENTS, AND SEPARATING THEM FROM THE AMERICAN CHILDREN THEY'RE CARING FOR. KIDS ARE BEING THROWN INTO THE BACK OF VAN UNTIL THEIR PARENTS ARE LOCATED.

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False

Fact Check: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is LCWRA going up in 2025? | TruthOrFake Blog