TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is Lady Gaga two days older than Ariana Grande?

Fact Check: Is Lady Gaga two days older than Ariana Grande?

Published June 12, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Is Lady Gaga Two Days Older than Ariana Grande? The claim that "Lady Gaga is two days older than Ariana Grande" has circulated in various forms, of...

Is Lady Gaga Two Days Older than Ariana Grande?

The claim that "Lady Gaga is two days older than Ariana Grande" has circulated in various forms, often in discussions about the ages of celebrities. To evaluate this assertion, we will delve into the birth dates of both artists and assess the credibility of the sources that discuss this claim.

What We Know

  1. Lady Gaga's Birth Date: According to multiple sources, Lady Gaga, whose real name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, was born on March 28, 1986 [1][3].

  2. Ariana Grande's Birth Date: Ariana Grande-Butera was born on June 26, 1993, as confirmed by her Wikipedia page and other reliable sources [2][4].

  3. Age Difference: The difference in their birth dates indicates that Lady Gaga is approximately 7 years and 3 months older than Ariana Grande, not just two days [1][2][4].

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  • Wikipedia: Both Lady Gaga's and Ariana Grande's Wikipedia pages are generally reliable as they are frequently updated and sourced from credible references. However, Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, which means that while the information is often accurate, it should be cross-verified with primary sources [1][2].

  • Fandom Wiki: The Ariana Grande Fandom Wiki provides similar information regarding Lady Gaga's birth date, but it is less authoritative than Wikipedia, as it may not be as rigorously fact-checked [3].

  • Social Media and Blogs: The claim that Lady Gaga is two days older than Ariana Grande appears on social media platforms and blogs, such as a post on Threads [4]. These sources often lack rigorous editorial oversight and can propagate misinformation, making them less reliable.

  • AI and Automated Responses: An automated response from Google's AI also claims that Lady Gaga is two days older than Ariana Grande [6]. While AI can provide quick answers, it is crucial to verify such claims against established facts, as AI can sometimes generate incorrect information.

  • Distractify: This source discusses the ages of various celebrities but does not specifically address the age difference between Lady Gaga and Ariana Grande in a factual manner [5].

Methodological Concerns

The assertion that Lady Gaga is two days older than Ariana Grande is fundamentally flawed based on the confirmed birth dates. The claim seems to stem from a misunderstanding or miscommunication regarding their ages. The sources that support the claim do not provide any evidence or methodology for how they arrived at the two-day difference, which raises questions about their reliability.

Conflicting Information

The overwhelming evidence supports that Lady Gaga is significantly older than Ariana Grande, contradicting the claim of a mere two-day difference. The lack of credible sources supporting the two-day assertion further undermines its validity.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that Lady Gaga is two days older than Ariana Grande is false. Evidence from multiple reliable sources confirms that Lady Gaga was born on March 28, 1986, while Ariana Grande was born on June 26, 1993. This establishes that Lady Gaga is approximately 7 years and 3 months older than Ariana Grande, not just two days.

It is important to note that the misinformation appears to stem from a misunderstanding or miscommunication regarding their ages, as the sources supporting the two-day claim lack credible evidence. Additionally, while social media and AI-generated responses can sometimes provide quick information, they are not always reliable and should be approached with skepticism.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and verify claims against established facts, especially when it comes to widely circulated assertions about public figures.

Sources

  1. Lady Gaga - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Gaga
  2. Ariana Grande - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariana_Grande
  3. Lady Gaga | Ariana Grande Wiki | Fandom. https://arianagrande.fandom.com/wiki/Lady_Gaga
  4. Yes, Lady Gaga is indeed two days older than Ariana Grande. https://www.threads.com/@just_call_me_oche/post/DHD1njtMN5d/yes-lady-gaga-is-indeed-two-days-older-than-ariana-grande-as-lady-gaga-was-born-?hl=en
  5. It's Shocking These Celebrities Are the Same Age - Distractify. https://www.distractify.com/entertainment/2018/09/19/Z22uUCi/celebrities-age
  6. Google's AI confidently declaring Lady Gaga (born 1986) is... https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pran-dataxlr8_just-spotted-this-gem-googles-ai-confidently-activity-7304946651935256576-s5Lr
  7. Ariana Grande Says Lady Gaga 'Changed My Life' in Birthday Tribute. https://people.com/music/ariana-grande-lady-gaga-birthday-tribute/
  8. Is ChatGPT Answering Questions Better Than Your... https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/chatgpt-answering-questions-better-than-your-favorite-jess-glynn-ylr5e

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is Lady Gaga married?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Lady Gaga married?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Lady Gaga married?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: REvil ransomware gang was linked to high-profile targets like Lady Gaga and Trump.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: REvil ransomware gang was linked to high-profile targets like Lady Gaga and Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: REvil ransomware gang was linked to high-profile targets like Lady Gaga and Trump.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle

Detailed fact-check analysis of: the President confirmed that First Lady Melania Trump is facing a critical and deeply private health battle

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Obama became president illegally because he was born in Kenya. The Bush family is involved in the New World Order (NWO). Hillary Clinton was passed over by the Vatican for the presidency because people care more about race than character. The Vatican is described as "Satan's earthly HQ" and supposedly orchestrates various political events. Trump was anti-Illuminati, fought a stolen election, and was targeted by a coup and various conspiracies. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is framed as part of a satanic/globalist plan (NWO). Jesus gave Trump two terms because of what the Vatican did on 9/11.
False

Fact Check: Obama became president illegally because he was born in Kenya. The Bush family is involved in the New World Order (NWO). Hillary Clinton was passed over by the Vatican for the presidency because people care more about race than character. The Vatican is described as "Satan's earthly HQ" and supposedly orchestrates various political events. Trump was anti-Illuminati, fought a stolen election, and was targeted by a coup and various conspiracies. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is framed as part of a satanic/globalist plan (NWO). Jesus gave Trump two terms because of what the Vatican did on 9/11.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Obama became president illegally because he was born in Kenya. The Bush family is involved in the New World Order (NWO). Hillary Clinton was passed over by the Vatican for the presidency because people care more about race than character. The Vatican is described as "Satan's earthly HQ" and supposedly orchestrates various political events. Trump was anti-Illuminati, fought a stolen election, and was targeted by a coup and various conspiracies. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is framed as part of a satanic/globalist plan (NWO). Jesus gave Trump two terms because of what the Vatican did on 9/11.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t
False

Fact Check: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Elon Musk and the U.S. President in Heated Clash After Controversial Encounter With First Lady In a shocking development t

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is Lady Gaga two days older than Ariana Grande? | TruthOrFake Blog