TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Is JGoot book legit?

Fact Check: Is JGoot book legit?

Published May 25, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Is JGoot Book Legit? ## Introduction The claim in question revolves around the legitimacy of JGoot, a travel education company that promotes method...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Is JGoot Book Legit?

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around the legitimacy of JGoot, a travel education company that promotes methods for travelers to save significantly on flights and hotels. The inquiry primarily focuses on whether the JGoot book and its associated services are credible and trustworthy. This analysis will explore various sources to assess the reliability of JGoot and its offerings.

What We Know

  1. Company Overview: JGoot, which stands for "Just Get Out Of Town," claims to educate travelers on how to save between 70% to 98% on travel costs by utilizing their own research rather than relying on travel agents or discount ticket brokers 2. They offer a book and additional services, including free livestreams and a premium subscription for more detailed alerts on travel deals.

  2. Customer Reviews: Reviews on platforms like Trustpilot indicate a mix of opinions. Some users have rated JGoot positively, citing helpful information and savings 6. However, there are also concerns about the lack of independent reviews outside of the company's own promotional materials, leading to skepticism regarding the authenticity of the positive feedback 5.

  3. Scam Allegations: Some sources raise red flags about the legitimacy of JGoot. For instance, a review on Scam Detector questions whether the site is a scam or a legitimate service, emphasizing the need for caution 1. Additionally, discussions on travel forums suggest that many users have not encountered reviews from independent sources, which raises questions about the credibility of the testimonials presented by the company 35.

  4. Service Model: JGoot operates on a free and premium model, where users can sign up for free alerts or pay for a premium service that offers more detailed notifications 4. This dual model is common in the travel industry, but it can also lead to skepticism about the value of the paid service compared to the free options.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding JGoot's legitimacy is mixed and requires careful consideration of the sources involved:

  • Credibility of Reviews: The reviews on Trustpilot and similar platforms are user-generated, which can be both a strength and a weakness. While they provide firsthand accounts, the potential for bias is significant, especially if the majority of reviews are from users who have been incentivized to share positive experiences or are affiliated with the company 26.

  • Concerns About Transparency: The lack of independent reviews is a notable concern. Many users on travel forums express frustration over the difficulty in finding unbiased opinions about JGoot, which could indicate a lack of transparency or a marketing strategy that relies heavily on self-promotion 35.

  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: The company's promotional materials and user testimonials may not fully disclose any affiliations or incentives that could influence the reviews. This lack of transparency can lead to skepticism about the authenticity of the claims made regarding the effectiveness of their services 7.

  • Methodology of Claims: The assertion that travelers can save significant amounts of money is appealing but requires scrutiny. The methodology behind how these savings are calculated and the specific strategies recommended by JGoot are not clearly outlined in the available reviews. More detailed information on the techniques taught in the JGoot book would be beneficial to assess the validity of the savings claims.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The investigation into JGoot's legitimacy reveals a landscape of mixed evidence. While some customer reviews suggest that users have found value in the services offered, the overwhelming presence of unverified testimonials and the lack of independent reviews raise significant concerns about the authenticity of these claims. The potential for bias in user-generated reviews, coupled with allegations of the company being a scam, further complicates the assessment of JGoot's credibility.

It is important to note that the claims of substantial savings presented by JGoot are appealing but lack detailed methodological support in the available evidence. This absence of clarity contributes to the uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of their services.

Readers should be aware of the limitations in the available evidence and approach the information with a critical mindset. The mixed reviews and potential conflicts of interest suggest that further independent verification is necessary before drawing definitive conclusions about JGoot's legitimacy. As always, it is advisable for individuals to conduct their own research and evaluate information critically.

Sources

  1. Scam Detector. "jgoot.com Reviews: Is this site a scam or legit?" https://www.scam-detector.com/validator/jgoot-com-review/
  2. Trustpilot. "Jgoot Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of jgoot.com." https://www.trustpilot.com/review/jgoot.com
  3. Tripadvisor. "Just Get Out of Town (JGOOT) - Air Travel Forum." https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g1-i10702-k12703936-Just_Get_Out_of_Town_JGOOT-Air_Travel.html
  4. Scamadviser. "jgoot.com Reviews | check if the site is a scam or legit." https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/jgoot.com
  5. Tripadvisor. "JGOOT (Just Get Out Of Town) - Bargain Travel Forum." https://www.tripadvisor.co.nz/ShowTopic-g1-i12290-k12659004-JGOOT_Just_Get_Out_Of_Town-Bargain_Travel.html
  6. Trustpilot. "Jgoot Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of jgoot.com." https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/jgoot.com
  7. Just Get Out of Town. "Sorry, this just seems like a scam." https://justgetoutoftown.com/blog/sorry-this-just-seems-like-a-scam/
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is JGoot legit?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is JGoot legit?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is JGoot legit?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is JGoot book worth it?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is JGoot book worth it?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is JGoot book worth it?

May 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Onyx Storm the last book?
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Onyx Storm the last book?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Onyx Storm the last book?

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Book of Mormon has racist teachings.
Partially True

Fact Check: The Book of Mormon has racist teachings.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Book of Mormon has racist teachings.

Jul 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: was elon musk named after a sci fi book character
Partially True

Fact Check: was elon musk named after a sci fi book character

Detailed fact-check analysis of: was elon musk named after a sci fi book character

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Is JGoot book legit? | TruthOrFake Blog