Fact Check: Is honey telling the truth

Fact Check: Is honey telling the truth

Published April 9, 2025
βœ—
VERDICT
Mostly False

# Is Honey Telling the Truth? The claim under scrutiny revolves around the integrity of the Honey browser extension and its associated marketing prac...

Is Honey Telling the Truth?

The claim under scrutiny revolves around the integrity of the Honey browser extension and its associated marketing practices. Allegations have surfaced suggesting that Honey, which is marketed as a tool for finding the best online discounts, may not be delivering on its promises and could be misleading both consumers and influencers. This article will analyze the available information regarding these claims, focusing on the authenticity of Honey's operations and the implications for consumers and content creators.

What We Know

  1. Honey's Functionality: Honey is a browser extension that claims to help users find and apply coupon codes automatically during online shopping. It has been marketed as a tool that saves users money by locating the best available discounts 7.

  2. Allegations of Misleading Practices: Recent reports indicate that Honey may not always provide the best discounts available. Some sources suggest that partner stores control which coupons are displayed, potentially withholding better discounts that are not approved by the retailer 8.

  3. Influencer Lawsuits: Influencers have filed lawsuits against Honey, alleging that the extension has engaged in deceptive practices that have resulted in financial losses for content creators who promote it. The lawsuits claim that Honey's methods are "deceitful and clandestine," and they seek compensation for damages 510.

  4. Honey's Response: PayPal, which owns Honey, has defended the extension, stating that it continues to be a valuable tool for consumers. The company has made updates to address some of the concerns raised by users and influencers 3.

  5. Honey's Reputation: The extension has faced scrutiny not only for its business practices but also for the broader implications of its marketing strategies. Some influencers have reported backlash from their audiences after promoting Honey, leading to a questioning of the authenticity of their endorsements 47.

Analysis

Credibility of Sources

  • Academic and Professional Sources: Articles from established academic journals, such as the one published in Nature, provide a rigorous examination of honey authenticity in a broader context, discussing analytical techniques for verifying honey quality 2. However, this source does not directly address the Honey browser extension, making it less relevant to the claim at hand.

  • News Outlets: Articles from reputable news sources like Tom's Guide and Coupons in the News report on the lawsuits and allegations against Honey, providing details on the claims made by influencers 57. These sources are generally reliable, but they may have a sensationalist angle, especially when discussing scams, which could influence their presentation of the facts.

  • User-Generated Content: Videos and articles from platforms like YouTube and personal blogs may provide anecdotal evidence and personal experiences regarding Honey's effectiveness. However, these sources can be biased and should be approached with caution due to potential conflicts of interest, particularly if the creators have a financial stake in promoting or discrediting the extension 48.

Methodology and Evidence

The claims against Honey primarily stem from anecdotal evidence and lawsuits filed by influencers. While these lawsuits highlight significant concerns, they do not provide comprehensive evidence of widespread deceptive practices affecting all users. The methodology behind these claims, such as how influencers quantify their losses or the specifics of Honey's alleged practices, remains unclear and would benefit from further investigation.

Context and Additional Information

Understanding the broader context of online couponing and discount extensions is essential. Honey operates in a competitive market where similar services exist, and consumer skepticism is growing regarding the authenticity of online discounts. Additional information that would be helpful includes:

  • Detailed consumer testimonials regarding their experiences with Honey.
  • Independent audits or studies evaluating the effectiveness of Honey compared to its competitors.
  • Insights from industry experts on the ethical implications of affiliate marketing practices in the couponing space.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that Honey consistently delivers the best discounts and operates transparently is mostly false. Evidence suggests that Honey may not always provide the best available discounts due to potential restrictions imposed by partner retailers. Additionally, lawsuits from influencers alleging deceptive practices raise significant concerns about the extension's marketing and operational integrity. However, the extent of these practices and their impact on all users remains unclear, as the evidence primarily stems from anecdotal reports and specific lawsuits rather than comprehensive data.

It is important to note that while there are valid concerns regarding Honey's practices, the lack of widespread evidence of deception affecting all users introduces a degree of uncertainty. The claims against Honey highlight the need for further investigation into its operations and the broader implications for consumers and influencers alike.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when assessing the credibility of claims related to online tools and services.

Sources

  1. Phony Honey A Sweet Deal For Counterfeiters, Bad For Consumers, Says Prof. (https://today.tamu.edu/2013/07/25/phony-honey-a-sweet-deal-for-counterfeiters-bad-for-consumers-says-prof/)
  2. Honey authenticity: the opacity of analytical reportsβ€”part 2. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-022-00127-5)
  3. How the Honey Extension Was Revealed to Be a Long-Running Scam. (https://www.scam-detector.com/how-the-honey-extension-was-revealed-to-be-a-long-running-scam/)
  4. Exposing the Honey Influencer Scam. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc4yL3YTwWk)
  5. Internet Influencers Sue Over Honey Coupon "Scam Of The Century". (https://couponsinthenews.com/2025/01/06/internet-influencers-sue-over-honey-coupon-scam-of-the-century/)
  6. Snopes.com | The definitive fact-checking site and reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation. (https://www.snopes.com/)
  7. Honey extension accused of scamming millions and content creators. (https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/software/honey-scandal-explained)
  8. How Honey is Scamming Influencers and Consumers: The Truth Behind the. (https://nzouat.com/how-honey-is-scamming-influencers-and-consumers/)
  9. 5 Ways To Tell If Honey Is Fake. (https://www.thedailymeal.com/1795484/honey-real-vs-fake/)
  10. Honey Browser Extension False Advertising under Investigation by Levi Korsinsky LLP. (https://www.abc4.com/business/press-releases/accesswire/1008500/honey-browser-extension-false-advertising-under-investigation-by-levi-korsinsky-llp)

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

πŸ’‘ Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
βœ“100% Free
βœ“No Registration
βœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
Are Trump's approval ratings in
the tank? Let's check it out. I
mean every politician would
like this number here
especially to see it go up. How
about compared to other
presidents who are Republicans?
Yeah. It's history making. It's
history making. What are we
talking about here? So why
don't we look back? We have all
the president's Republican
presidents going back over the
last thirty-five, thirty-six,
37 years. What are we talking
about? GOP who strongly
approved 5 months in. Look at
this. George, HW Bush, Bush
forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three,
fifty you see Trump the first
00:31
term 53, but look at this 63%
he beats all the other
Republicans on the board here
and I was looking even back
since Reagan and get this
Donald Trump beats Ronald
Reagan when it comes to the
strongly approved five months
and of course Reagan was coming
off that high after that
assassination attempt so the
bottom line is Donald Trump is
making history with the
Republican base he is more
beloved by this Republican base
than any Republican base loved
any GOP president 5 months in.
It is history making. Even CNN
01:03
is telling the truth. Feels
like hell might be freezing
over.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Are Trump's approval ratings in the tank? Let's check it out. I mean every politician would like this number here especially to see it go up. How about compared to other presidents who are Republicans? Yeah. It's history making. It's history making. What are we talking about here? So why don't we look back? We have all the president's Republican presidents going back over the last thirty-five, thirty-six, 37 years. What are we talking about? GOP who strongly approved 5 months in. Look at this. George, HW Bush, Bush forty1, 46%. Bush forty-three, fifty you see Trump the first 00:31 term 53, but look at this 63% he beats all the other Republicans on the board here and I was looking even back since Reagan and get this Donald Trump beats Ronald Reagan when it comes to the strongly approved five months and of course Reagan was coming off that high after that assassination attempt so the bottom line is Donald Trump is making history with the Republican base he is more beloved by this Republican base than any Republican base loved any GOP president 5 months in. It is history making. Even CNN 01:03 is telling the truth. Feels like hell might be freezing over.

Aug 4, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: trump says greenhouse bases are of no danger to humans.  is he wrong or just not telling the truth?
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: trump says greenhouse bases are of no danger to humans. is he wrong or just not telling the truth?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: trump says greenhouse bases are of no danger to humans. is he wrong or just not telling the truth?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more β†’
πŸ”
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: 
Is Fox News telling the truth about protesters in California?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is Fox News telling the truth about protesters in California?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Fox News telling the truth about protesters in California?

Jun 12, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Is telling kids not to have girlfriends until university bad
Unverified

Fact Check: Is telling kids not to have girlfriends until university bad

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is telling kids not to have girlfriends until university bad

Jul 23, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Honey bee colonies can recover from one or two tough years.
Partially True

Fact Check: Honey bee colonies can recover from one or two tough years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Honey bee colonies can recover from one or two tough years.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more β†’
Fact Check: Is honey telling the truth | TruthOrFake Blog