Fact Check: Is Guyana safe?

Fact Check: Is Guyana safe?

Published May 25, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Is Guyana Safe? A Detailed Examination of Safety Claims ## Introduction The claim regarding the safety of Guyana has gained attention, particularly...

Is Guyana Safe? A Detailed Examination of Safety Claims

Introduction

The claim regarding the safety of Guyana has gained attention, particularly in light of varying reports about crime rates and travel advisories. Some sources indicate a significant decrease in serious crimes, while others warn travelers about the prevalence of violent crime. This article aims to explore the nuances of these claims without reaching a definitive conclusion.

What We Know

  1. Travel Advisories: The U.S. State Department advises travelers to "reconsider travel" to Guyana due to high crime rates, including violent crimes such as murder and armed robbery, particularly at night. They note that local police often lack the resources to respond effectively to serious incidents 18.

  2. Crime Statistics: According to the Guyana Police Force, there has been a reported decrease in serious crimes by 17.8% from January to November 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. This includes a notable reduction in robbery with violence 24. However, the number of murders reportedly increased by 18.7% during the same timeframe, raising questions about the overall safety situation 10.

  3. Comparative Safety Reports: Various travel safety websites, such as Travel Safe Abroad and Travel Noire, highlight the risks associated with traveling to Guyana, including petty crime targeting tourists and the prevalence of violent crime 37. These reports often compare Guyana's safety ratings with those of other countries, suggesting that the risk level may be higher than in many other destinations.

  4. International Perspectives: Canada’s travel advisory aligns with the U.S. advisory, indicating a cautious stance towards travel in Guyana due to crime 5. This consistency among international advisories suggests a broader recognition of safety concerns.

Analysis

The conflicting reports about crime rates in Guyana necessitate a critical examination of the sources and their methodologies:

  • Government Sources: The Guyana Police Force's reports of decreased crime rates are based on their internal statistics. While such data can provide insight, they may also be subject to biases or underreporting, especially in regions where police resources are limited 24. The increase in murder rates, as reported by the Crime Chief, complicates the narrative of overall safety improvements 10.

  • Travel Advisory Sources: The U.S. State Department and other governmental travel advisories are generally considered reliable due to their systematic approach to assessing safety risks. However, they may also reflect a conservative stance that prioritizes caution, which can sometimes lead to perceptions of heightened danger 156.

  • Travel Safety Websites: Websites like Travel Safe Abroad and Travel Noire provide valuable insights but may lack the rigorous data collection methods of governmental sources. Their assessments can be influenced by anecdotal evidence and personal experiences, which may not represent the broader safety landscape 37.

  • Potential Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have a vested interest in promoting tourism or travel safety, which could lead to biased reporting. For example, travel agencies might downplay risks to encourage bookings, while advocacy groups may emphasize dangers to push for policy changes.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful?

To better understand the safety situation in Guyana, additional data would be beneficial, including:

  • Longitudinal studies on crime trends over several years to assess whether the reported decreases are part of a larger trend or anomalies.
  • Independent assessments of police effectiveness and community safety perceptions.
  • More detailed breakdowns of crime statistics, including the context of violent incidents and their locations.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim regarding the safety of Guyana is deemed "Partially True" based on the evidence reviewed. While there are reports of a decrease in serious crimes, including robbery with violence, the increase in murder rates raises significant concerns about overall safety. The U.S. and Canadian travel advisories reflect a cautious approach, highlighting the risks associated with violent crime, particularly for travelers.

It is important to note that the data from the Guyana Police Force may be subject to biases and underreporting, which complicates the narrative of improved safety. Additionally, travel safety websites provide valuable insights but may not always rely on rigorous data collection methods, leading to potential discrepancies in their assessments.

The limitations in the available evidence underscore the need for further research, including independent evaluations of crime trends and police effectiveness. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information from multiple sources when considering travel to Guyana or assessing its safety.

Sources

  1. Guyana Travel Advisory - U.S. State Department. Link
  2. Serious crimes decreased by 17.8 per cent in 2023 - Crime Chief. Link
  3. Is Guyana Safe? Crime Rates & Safety Report - Travel Safe - Abroad. Link
  4. Guyana sees 17 % reduction in serious crimes - Guyana Chronicle. Link
  5. Travel advice and advisories for Guyana - Government of Canada. Link
  6. Travel Advisories and Safety Alerts for U.S. Citizens in Guyana. Link
  7. Is Guyana Safe? A Guide for Tourists - Travel Noire. Link
  8. State Department Reissues Travel Advisory For Guyana Due To Crime. Link
  9. Safety Guide: Is Guyana Safe? - TravelRight. Link
  10. 133 murders recorded so far in 2023 - Crime Chief - INews Guyana. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gold is Guyana's second most important export after oil.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Gold is Guyana's second most important export after oil.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gold is Guyana's second most important export after oil.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is zip extractor safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is xylitol safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wowroms safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Guyana safe? | TruthOrFake Blog