Fact Check: Is DNS AdGuard safe?

Fact Check: Is DNS AdGuard safe?

Published May 10, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Is DNS AdGuard Safe? ## Introduction The claim under examination is whether AdGuard DNS is a safe option for users seeking to enhance their online ...

Is DNS AdGuard Safe?

Introduction

The claim under examination is whether AdGuard DNS is a safe option for users seeking to enhance their online privacy and ad-blocking capabilities. AdGuard DNS is a service that provides domain name resolution while also blocking ads and trackers at the network level. As digital privacy concerns grow, many users are turning to third-party DNS providers like AdGuard, prompting questions about their safety and reliability.

What We Know

  1. AdGuard DNS Overview: AdGuard DNS was relaunched in July 2022, offering features such as ad-blocking, tracker blocking, and protection against malicious domains. It supports various protocols including DNS over HTTPS (DoH) and DNS over TLS (DoT) 36.

  2. User Experience: Anecdotal evidence from users suggests that AdGuard DNS effectively reduces the number of ads encountered during browsing. One user reported significant satisfaction with the service, indicating a decrease in ads when using AdGuard DNS 2.

  3. Performance Metrics: According to AdGuard, their DNS service handles over 216 billion queries per day from more than 100 million users, which suggests a robust infrastructure 4.

  4. Comparative Analysis: Various articles compare AdGuard DNS with other DNS providers, noting its effectiveness in blocking ads and trackers. Some reviews highlight its performance in ad-blocking tests, often giving it high marks 79.

  5. Privacy and Security Features: AdGuard DNS claims to offer features that enhance user privacy, such as blocking known trackers and malicious domains. However, the specifics of how user data is handled and stored are less clear, which raises questions about privacy 68.

Analysis

Source Reliability

  • AdGuard's Official Blog and Reports: The information from AdGuard’s own blog and reports 14 is likely to be biased as it promotes their services. While it provides useful insights into the features and usage statistics, it may lack objectivity.

  • User Testimonials: User experiences shared on forums 2 can provide valuable anecdotal evidence but are not scientifically rigorous. They may not represent the broader user base and can be influenced by individual circumstances.

  • Comparative Reviews: Articles from websites like Avoid The Hack 3 and Simeon on Security 7 offer comparative analyses of DNS providers. These sources can be more reliable if they are independent and not affiliated with any particular service. However, their conclusions can still be influenced by the authors' biases or the methodologies used in their evaluations.

Methodology and Evidence

  • The claims about AdGuard DNS's effectiveness are primarily based on user experiences and performance metrics provided by the company itself. While high query volumes and user satisfaction are promising, they do not independently verify the safety of the service.

  • The lack of detailed information regarding data handling practices raises concerns. For a comprehensive assessment of safety, it would be beneficial to have third-party audits or transparency reports that detail how user data is managed and protected.

Conflicts of Interest

  • Many of the sources discussing AdGuard DNS, particularly those that are promotional or review-based, may have conflicts of interest. For example, if a review site receives compensation for promoting AdGuard, this could skew their evaluation of the service.

What We Don't Know

  • There is limited information on how AdGuard DNS manages user data and whether it logs user queries. More transparency regarding data retention policies and security measures would be beneficial for users concerned about privacy.

  • Independent studies or audits assessing the security and privacy practices of AdGuard DNS would provide a clearer picture of its safety.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that AdGuard DNS is a safe option for enhancing online privacy and ad-blocking capabilities is partially true. Evidence suggests that AdGuard DNS effectively blocks ads and trackers, as indicated by user testimonials and performance metrics. However, the lack of transparency regarding data handling practices and potential conflicts of interest in the sources reviewed raise concerns about its overall safety.

While user satisfaction and high query volumes are promising indicators, they do not provide a comprehensive assessment of safety. The absence of independent audits or detailed transparency reports limits our understanding of how user data is managed, which is crucial for evaluating privacy claims.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the limitations of the evidence presented. It is important to remain cautious and informed when choosing services that impact online privacy and security.

Sources

  1. AdGuard year recap: the best moments of 2023 - AdGuard DNS Blog. Link
  2. Using AdGuard as the default DNS server, is it safe to disable my ... - SNB Forums. Link
  3. Avoid The Hack: 8 Best DNS Providers for Privacy (and adblocking). Link
  4. Ads and trackers in 2023: how do they affect your browsing? - AdGuard. Link
  5. AdGuard Review & Cost 2025: Scam, Safe or Legit? - Cookies. Link
  6. Is Adguard DNS Safe? Everything You Need To Know - Yoodley. Link
  7. Next DNS vs AdGuard DNS vs Quad9 vs Cloudflare DNS ... - Simeon on Security. Link
  8. AdGuard Review 2025: Can This App Block It All? - All About Cookies. Link
  9. AdGuard Review 2025: How Good Is It? - Cybernews. Link
  10. Leaving for Adguard - Discussions. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Anadius safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Anadius safe?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is zip extractor safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is zip extractor safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is xylitol safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is xylitol safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wowroms safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wowroms safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is wcoforever safe?
Partially True

Fact Check: Is wcoforever safe?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is wcoforever safe?

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →