Fact Check: Is CGPA equivalent to percentage?

Fact Check: Is CGPA equivalent to percentage?

Published May 10, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Is CGPA Equivalent to Percentage? The claim that "CGPA is equivalent to percentage" raises questions about the relationship between these two acade...

Is CGPA Equivalent to Percentage?

The claim that "CGPA is equivalent to percentage" raises questions about the relationship between these two academic performance metrics. CGPA, or Cumulative Grade Point Average, is commonly used in educational institutions to summarize a student's academic performance, while percentage scores provide a more straightforward representation of marks obtained out of a total possible score. This article explores the nuances of CGPA and percentage, including conversion methods and the implications of using one system over the other.

What We Know

  1. Definitions: CGPA is a grading system that averages the grade points earned across all subjects in a semester or academic year, typically on a scale of 0 to 10 or 0 to 4, depending on the institution 9. In contrast, percentage represents the ratio of marks obtained to total marks, expressed as a fraction of 100 3.

  2. Conversion Methods: A commonly cited formula for converting CGPA to percentage is: [ \text{Percentage} = \text{CGPA} \times 9.5 ] This formula is based on the assumption that the CGPA scale is out of 10 24. However, it's important to note that different institutions may use different conversion factors, and students are advised to verify the specific method used by their institution 2.

  3. Contextual Use: Percentages are often preferred by universities and employers as they provide a clear and direct measure of academic performance. This can be particularly relevant when applying for jobs or further studies, where institutions may request percentage scores for comparison 16.

  4. Differences in Interpretation: CGPA provides a rounded average that may not reflect the exact marks obtained, while percentage scores indicate precise performance. This distinction can influence how students perceive their academic achievements and how they are evaluated by others 38.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  1. EDUCBA: This source provides a general overview of why converting CGPA to percentage is important, particularly for applications. However, it lacks detailed methodology or empirical evidence supporting the claims made 1.

  2. K-State Collegian: This article discusses a widely accepted conversion formula and emphasizes the variability in conversion factors used by different institutions. The source appears credible as it is associated with a university publication, but it does not provide specific references to studies or data backing the conversion method 2.

  3. Student Patrika: This source highlights the differences between CGPA and percentage, noting the psychological impact of each grading system. While it presents useful information, it does not cite specific studies or data, which raises questions about the robustness of its claims 3.

  4. Calculatorway: This site provides a straightforward calculator for CGPA to percentage conversion and explains the formula used. However, it lacks academic rigor and does not reference any authoritative sources 4.

  5. AbroadCube: Similar to Calculatorway, this source offers a simple conversion method but does not provide additional context or validation for the formula, which limits its reliability 5.

  6. CGPA to Percentage: This source discusses the merits and limitations of both grading systems but does not delve into empirical evidence or studies that could substantiate its claims 6.

Methodological Considerations

The conversion from CGPA to percentage is often based on a formula that assumes a specific grading scale. However, the applicability of this formula can vary significantly based on the institution's grading policies. A more comprehensive analysis would involve examining a range of institutions and their specific grading systems to determine the accuracy and reliability of the conversion methods.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources may have inherent biases, particularly those affiliated with educational institutions or organizations that benefit from promoting a specific grading system. This potential bias should be considered when evaluating the reliability of the information presented.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that CGPA is equivalent to percentage is partially true, as there are established methods for converting CGPA to percentage, such as the commonly used formula of multiplying CGPA by 9.5. However, this conversion is not universally applicable, as different institutions may employ varying scales and conversion factors. The nuances in grading systems and the psychological implications of CGPA versus percentage further complicate the equivalency.

It is important to acknowledge that while the conversion formula provides a useful guideline, it does not account for the specific grading policies of all educational institutions. The lack of empirical evidence supporting the uniformity of conversion methods also introduces uncertainty. Therefore, students should verify the conversion practices of their respective institutions and critically evaluate the information they encounter regarding CGPA and percentage.

Readers are encouraged to approach such claims with skepticism and to seek out reliable sources to inform their understanding of academic performance metrics.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Is CGPA percentage?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is CGPA percentage?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is CGPA percentage?

May 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  EM normandie and EMLV are equivalent businees school in france
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: EM normandie and EMLV are equivalent businees school in france

Detailed fact-check analysis of: EM normandie and EMLV are equivalent businees school in france

May 14, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are sgpa and cgpa same?
False

Fact Check: Are sgpa and cgpa same?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are sgpa and cgpa same?

May 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are cgpa and gpa same?
False

Fact Check: Are cgpa and gpa same?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgpa and gpa same?

May 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are cgpa and gpa same?
False

Fact Check: Are cgpa and gpa same?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are cgpa and gpa same?

May 2, 2025
Read more →