Fact Check: Is California planning to secede from the US?

Fact Check: Is California planning to secede from the US?

June 8, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: Is California Planning to Secede from the US? ## What We Know A proposed initiative in California has entered circulation that would r...

Fact Check: Is California Planning to Secede from the US?

What We Know

A proposed initiative in California has entered circulation that would require a future vote on whether the state should become an independent country. According to the California Secretary of State, the initiative was cleared to begin collecting petition signatures on January 23, 2025. If the initiative gathers enough support, it will place a question on the November 2028 ballot asking voters if California should leave the United States and become a free and independent country. For the measure to pass, at least 50% of registered voters must participate, and 55% must vote "yes." However, even if passed, this measure would not immediately alter California's government or its relationship with the United States.

The initiative also proposes the creation of a commission to report on California's viability as an independent country, with estimated costs of around $10 million for election-related expenses and $2 million annually to operate the commission.

The movement for California's independence is not new. The political action committee Yes California has been advocating for the state's secession since 2015. Although their previous efforts, including a proposed 2019 ballot initiative, did not succeed, the group has continued to push for independence, citing political and cultural differences between California and the rest of the United States.

Analysis

The claim that California is planning to secede from the US is based on the recent initiative that has been cleared for signature collection. However, this does not equate to an official plan for secession. The initiative merely sets the stage for a potential public vote in 2028, which itself would not guarantee secession. The US Constitution does not provide a legal pathway for a state to unilaterally secede, and any attempt would require a constitutional amendment—a highly improbable scenario given the political complexities involved.

The reliability of sources discussing California's secession efforts varies. The California Secretary of State's office provides official and credible information regarding the initiative's status. In contrast, Yes California, while a legitimate organization, has a clear bias towards promoting secession, which may color their presentation of facts. Media outlets like CBS News and The Independent offer additional perspectives on the movement's traction and public perception but should be read with an understanding of their potential editorial biases.

Conclusion

The claim that California is planning to secede from the US is Partially True. While there is an initiative in circulation that could lead to a vote on California's independence, this does not constitute an official plan for secession. The initiative's success is uncertain, and even if passed, it would not immediately result in California's secession due to legal and constitutional barriers.

Sources

  1. Proposed Initiative Enters Circulation: Requires Future Vote on Whether California Should Become Independent Country
  2. Yes California - Wikipedia
  3. California will put secession back on the map
  4. California secession: The new plan to break up the state
  5. Is California secession possible? Here's what the US Constitution says
  6. Man behind 2028 "Calexit" bid says movement for independence is gaining traction
  7. California secession proponents get green light to take initiative forward
  8. Why California wants to leave US: Is California secession possible?

Got your own claim to verify? It's 100% Free!

Join thousands who trust our AI-powered fact-checking. Completely free with no registration required. Your claim could be the next important truth we uncover.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: California fire , was it trump
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: California fire , was it trump

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California fire , was it trump

Mar 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: El deterioro de estados como California se debe al capitalismo y costo de vivienda.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: El deterioro de estados como California se debe al capitalismo y costo de vivienda.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: El deterioro de estados como California se debe al capitalismo y costo de vivienda.

Mar 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is Trump planning a military parade for his birthday?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is Trump planning a military parade for his birthday?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is Trump planning a military parade for his birthday?

Apr 9, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financia...

Mar 25, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financial Post, by Matthew Lau. "Having left his gig as UN Special Envoy for Climate and Finance to lead the federal Liberal government, Mark Carney is now in a position to focus his and Greta Thunberg’s global climate crusade squarely on Canada. The crusade, Carney boasted back in 2021 while in his previous role, is worth many trillions of dollars. As he told CBC News at that year’s UN climate conference, “We have banks, asset managers, pension funds, insurance companies from around the world — more than 45 countries — and their total resources, totalling US$130 trillion” dedicated to transitioning the world’s economy away from fossil fuels. That dollar figure is higher than global GDP. Last month, Carney laid out Canada’s required contribution to his climate ambitions: “Canada must invest $2 trillion by 2050 — about $80 billion per year — to become carbon competitive and achieve Net Zero. However, investments in decarbonisation currently run between $10–20 billion annually.” The implication is that another $60-70 billion a year will need to be wrung out of Canadian businesses and consumers, either through direct taxation and government spending or with regulatory browbeating to push Canadians’ savings and investments into global warming initiatives. Carney has made no effort to hide his agenda to browbeat businesses into joining his and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade. In a 2021 interview he declared, “We need a sustainable economy, and is your business aligned with that? Are your hiring practices consistent with that? Are you developing people in a way that’s consistent with that? Ultimately, what’s being asked of businesses when it comes to climate is, do you have a plan for net-zero? Canada has a legislated objective for net zero alongside another 130 countries.” “A Swedish teenager,” Carney continued, referring to Thunberg, “can figure out the carbon budget and that we have less than 10 years and you have to get to net-zero to stabilize it and if you’re a company and you have purpose, well, what’s your plan? And all these plans need to come together.” This is utter insanity: under Justin Trudeau Canada suffered rapidly declining business investment and now his successor wants the country’s business leaders to take financial planning directives from Greta Thunberg. While the federal government barrels down the road to net-zero impoverishment for Canada, everyone else is looking for the exit ramp. In January, six of the largest U.S. banks — JPMorganChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley — quit the Carney-led net-zero banking alliance. Canada’s Big Six Banks — RBC, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC and National Bank — have quit the initiative as well. Even Europe is beginning to back off on government piling climate obligations onto businesses in the name of fighting global warming. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the EU is watering down its climate accounting policies “amid pushback from member states and companies within the bloc over the new rules, which they say would have increased costs and reduced the competitiveness of their business.” Specifically, regulations previously scheduled for this year would have forced companies “to report in detail on their environmental, social and corporate-governance performance while making significant cuts to the emissions from within their supply chain.” The EU is now dropping, weakening or postponing many of these climate regulations, so that businesses will be able to better “grow, innovate, and create quality jobs.” This is effectively an admission that piling climate obligations and environmental reporting mandates onto businesses prevents them from growing, innovating and creating good jobs. Unfortunately, Mark Carney is all about climate obligations and reporting mandates. The road Canada is currently marching down for climate-related financial disclosures is based on a framework proposed by a task force Carney initiated in 2015. His aforementioned Thunberg-praising interview was not with an environmental journalist, but with Pivot Magazine, which is published by CPA Canada, the accounting industry’s national association. “We cannot get to net-zero without proper climate reporting,” he insisted, speaking of the need for “one core global standard” for climate accounting and reporting. A global climate reporting standard to help push trillions of dollars — yes, trillions with a “T” — from Canadian workers and taxpayers into Mark Carney and Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade? After a decade of Justin Trudeau’s ruinous policies weakening Canada from coast to coast, there could be little worse for the country and its economy than a Liberal government led by Mark Carney." The Financial Post Cape Breton Politics Jason Boudreau · 1h · Big numbers in unions. 😁😁

Detailed fact-check analysis of: How nuts is Mark Carney? Perhaps nuttier than you think. Have a read of this piece in the Financia...

Mar 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are there other nations other than the United States planning a trump assassination
Partially True

Fact Check: Are there other nations other than the United States planning a trump assassination

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are there other nations other than the United States planning a trump assassination

Mar 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is California planning to secede from the US? | TruthOrFake Blog