Fact Check: Iran warns U.S. strikes will have 'everlasting consequences'.

Fact Check: "Iran warns U.S. strikes will have 'everlasting consequences'"

What We Know

On June 22, 2025, following a series of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iranian officials, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, condemned the attacks as "outrageous" and warned that they would have "everlasting consequences" for the United States. The strikes targeted key sites such as Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, which are critical to Iran's nuclear program (source-2, source-5). President Donald Trump characterized the operation as a significant military success and threatened further action if Iran did not comply with U.S. demands for peace (source-4, source-6).

Analysis

The claim that Iran warned the U.S. strikes would have "everlasting consequences" is supported by multiple credible sources. Araghchi's statement reflects a consistent theme in Iranian rhetoric, particularly in response to military actions perceived as aggressive. The phrase "everlasting consequences" suggests a long-term impact, which aligns with Iran's historical stance on U.S. military interventions in the region (source-4, source-7).

The sources reporting this statement, including major news outlets like CNN and The Washington Post, are generally considered reliable. They have established editorial standards and fact-checking protocols. However, it is important to note that the context of the statement is rooted in a highly charged political environment, which may influence the framing of such warnings. The Iranian government often uses strong language in response to perceived threats, which can sometimes be interpreted as posturing rather than a literal indication of future actions (source-5, source-6).

Conclusion

The claim that Iran warned the U.S. strikes would have "everlasting consequences" is True. This assertion is directly supported by statements from Iranian officials in response to U.S. military actions. The context of these statements reflects a longstanding pattern of Iranian rhetoric regarding U.S. interventions, emphasizing the potential for significant and lasting repercussions.